Foreigner is one of the top selling rock bands of all-time and Lou Gramm was a vocal powerhouse.I think The Monkees are the most glaring oversight. And letting in Foreigner was like baseball letting in Harold Baines. It was the end of any standards.
Robert Palmer should be in there.
He absolutely does. I'm suprised that he isn't in.
This is from a decade before Addicted to Love/MTV nd one of the best things he did,
I thought it was a little strange that we had people complaining about Foreigner being in and The Meters not being in.Foreigner is one of the top selling rock bands of all-time and Lou Gramm was a vocal powerhouse.
this criteria might not mean much. I looked up three lists of bestselling artists - one was top 20 and Foreigner was not on it, one was top 25 and foreigner was 17 and a list that just listed artist in order had Foreigner at 71st.Foreigner is one of the top selling rock bands of all-time and Lou Gramm was a vocal powerhouse.
Yeah, corporate rock. Boston was 10x better.Foreigner is one of the top selling rock bands of all-time and Lou Gramm was a vocal powerhouse.
Boston was better. Both were good. Neither were "corporate rock" which mostly became a thing in the 90s as overproduction and then autotune started to become common and MTV influence meant less focus on the music. Now we have AI bands. It's pathetic and sad.Yeah, corporate rock. Boston was 10x better.
Did you read this on Wikipedia? Because "corporate rock" was a common term in the 70's.Neither were "corporate rock" which mostly became a thing in the 90s as overproduction and then autotune started to become common and MTV influence meant less focus on the music.
It's funny you say that because I always associate the two bands with each other. I'm not much of a fan of either but give Foreigner the slight edge because of Lou Gramm's voice.Yeah, corporate rock. Boston was 10x better.
No. My father in law was in the record business in that era, so I got a lot of inside background on it. You may mean something different by "corporate", but Boston was a group of talented musicians formed from a band called Mother's Milk. Stoltz was the genius behind it, started it while at MIT. Most of that debut album was recorded in the home studio Stoltz built in his basement. Very non-corporate.Did you read this on Wikipedia? Because "corporate rock" was a common term in the 70's.
I have no inside background but I read Creem Magazine in the 70's and they called Foreigner corporate rock.My father in law was in the record business in that era, so I got a lot of inside background on it.
What makes Boston more HOF-worthy too me was that they were phenomenon when they first hit the airwaves. They sounded much better on the typical car stereo then anything else. I think they were influential in making other bands pick up their sound game. That entire first album is good. I always considered Foreigner as replacement-level hard rock; only as good as their hits. Their one most identifiable riff came from a hired sax player.It's funny you say that because I always associate the two bands with each other. I'm not much of a fan of either but give Foreigner the slight edge because of Lou Gramm's voice.