RIP to Bulls | The Boneyard

RIP to Bulls

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,057
Reaction Score
66,149
Shocker! Just kidding, this was a done deal about halfway through last season. Great spot for RIP.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,427
Reaction Score
18,015
Shocker! Just kidding, this was a done deal about halfway through last season. Great spot for RIP.
haha should be exciting to see him play for a team he actually wants to play on
 

EricLA

Cronus
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
14,985
Reaction Score
81,486
the espn analyst said hamilton isn't a good fit because most of the highlights show him hitting mid range jumpers and the Bulls need a 2G who can hit the 3. he's a career 35% 3 point shooter. not sure how many of his shots are from out there but how about doing that kind of homework instead of saying he's not a good match because of 20 seconds of highlights?
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,057
Reaction Score
66,149
Anything above 33% is excellent from three. It equates to 50% from inside the arc. It's amazing how many people do not understand that.

Last year he was 38%.
 

nomar

#1 Casual Fan™
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
15,587
Reaction Score
41,860
Haha, a rare Ajou Deng reference on ESPN.com
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
815
Reaction Score
5,216
Anything above 33% is excellent from three. It equates to 50% from inside the arc. It's amazing how many people do not understand that.

Last year he was 38%.
League average is 35%, so i wouldn't consider 33% excellent by any means.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
4,400
Reaction Score
12,783
He's not a good 3-point shooter, but he's decent enough. Certainly better from long range than the rest of the trash the Bulls were throwing out there at SG last season (aside from Korver, but he's a liability at everything BUT shooting).

That's a ridiculous reason to say he isn't a good fit for the Bulls, though. He has an excellent mid-range/finesse game that should complement Rose's power drives to the basket quite well. Oh, and did I mention he's about a thousand times better than what the Bulls had at 2G last year?

Solid move for both parties.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,588
Reaction Score
12,509
Anything above 33% is excellent from three. It equates to 50% from inside the arc. It's amazing how many people do not understand that.

Last year he was 38%.
So if his toes are an inch past the arc his chances of making the shot shoot up to 50%?
 

RoderickSpode

7th Earl of Sidcup
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
646
Reaction Score
3,072
So if his toes are an inch past the arc his chances of making the shot shoot up to 50%?
His point is that if a player only attempts threes, he can hit 33% of his shots and still net the same points as a 50% shooter whose attempts all occur inside the arc.

6 points on 2-6 shooting from 3pt = 33%
6 points on 3-6 shooting from 2pt = 50%
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,314
Reaction Score
500
Awesome! great destination for him and 3 years? even better.
 

BUHusky

The original. Accept no substitutes.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,459
Reaction Score
4,040
Congrats to Rip! Great pickup for the Bulls.

And in Rip's honor...
 

huskyharry

Hooyah
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,543
Reaction Score
4,105
the espn analyst said hamilton isn't a good fit because most of the highlights show him hitting mid range jumpers and the Bulls need a 2G who can hit the 3. he's a career 35% 3 point shooter. not sure how many of his shots are from out there but how about doing that kind of homework instead of saying he's not a good match because of 20 seconds of highlights?
Talking heads love to focus on player's shortcomings and predict poor results...glad to see Rip on a contending team...now I have to add the Bulls & Clips as teams to cheer for!
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,430
Reaction Score
14,394
He's not a good 3-point shooter, but he's decent enough. Certainly better from long range than the rest of the trash the Bulls were throwing out there at SG last season (aside from Korver, but he's a liability at everything BUT shooting).

That's a ridiculous reason to say he isn't a good fit for the Bulls, though. He has an excellent mid-range/finesse game that should complement Rose's power drives to the basket quite well. Oh, and did I mention he's about a thousand times better than what the Bulls had at 2G last year?

Solid move for both parties.

if i could like your post a hundred times id do it. the bulls have been awful at the 2 since jordan left. ill take rip over bogans or whomever we had there in recent years. im a lifelong bulls fan,infact ive been a bulls fan longer than ive been a husky fan and im as excited for this season as ive ever been. our starting five is as good as any.
 

alexrgct

RIP, Alex
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
10,094
Reaction Score
15,650
Am I the only person who thought initially this thread had to do with the demise of the Bulls?
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 4>1 But 5>>>>1 is even better!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,003
Reaction Score
41,855
Am I the only person who thought initially this thread had to do with the demise of the Bulls?
No you're not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
439
Guests online
3,139
Total visitors
3,578

Forum statistics

Threads
156,871
Messages
4,068,406
Members
9,949
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom