reminder of those projected WINS

[DaddyChoc]

dont count your eggs before they're hatched.

and we're talking about easily beating RANKED teams...

thats why the games are played

 

[ThisJustIn]

feels like a non sequitur.... did I miss a discussion about eggs over easy?

 

[jsloanjr]

Monday night will be a very tough game for UCONN to win........The 3 freshemen will need yo step up and Heather will need to have a big game.......The guards will be ok.....

 

[Tonyc]

Monday night I want to see the Stanford guard pass the ball in the middle. UConn has a reputation for filling the passing lanes. I also want to see Stanford play perimiter defense and their guards run with us. Lets face it most of Stanfords points will come from the O sisters and if they both score 20 how many other players will score in double figures. I see UConn by 10+.

 

[connboy77]

Monday night will be a very tough game for UCONN to win........The 3 freshemen will need yo step up and Heather will need to have a big game.......The guards will be ok.....

Yes, UCONN is going to need total team effort tomorrow to beat Stanford. A win is not a given, it must be earned.

 

[DaddyChoc]

Im not worried about Stanford... win or lose... Im talking about those teams in the middle of the pack that some have already put an L next to their names before they even played against UConn

 

[doggydaddy]

What teams are those, DC??

 

[DaddyChoc]

Georgetown... St Johns ummmm WVa. Pitt, UNC, you know the guaranteed wins. oh yeah TAMU, Duke, Rutgers (thinkin' thinkin')....ummmmm Louisville Depaul Okla

Im sure you've seen "no more than 4 losses" ND, Stanford, Baylor and in the FF.

when a top 5 team lose to an unranked team can you imagine the chances RANKED teams have against a top 5 team.

yeah I know this is UConn, Geno is the best ever but... Im just saying.

 

[Icebear]

Have faith, DC.

 

[doggydaddy]

Georgetown... St Johns ummmm WVa. Pitt, UNC, you know the guaranteed wins. oh yeah TAMU, Duke, Rutgers (thinkin' thinkin')....ummmmm Louisville Depaul Okla

Im sure you've seen "no more than 4 losses" ND, Stanford, Baylor and in the FF.

when a top 5 team lose to an unranked team can you imagine the chances RANKED teams have against a top 5 team.

yeah I know this is UConn, Geno is the best ever but... Im just saying.

I guess I don't get it. Did someone guarentee those wins? I mean, if a poster says they think Uconn will only lose 4 games, do they need to be called out on that because Tennessee was an upset victim?

 

[speedoo]

Georgetown... St Johns ummmm WVa. Pitt, UNC, you know the guaranteed wins. oh yeah TAMU, Duke, Rutgers (thinkin' thinkin')....ummmmm Louisville Depaul Okla

Im sure you've seen "no more than 4 losses" ND, Stanford, Baylor and in the FF.

when a top 5 team lose to an unranked team can you imagine the chances RANKED teams have against a top 5 team.

yeah I know this is UConn, Geno is the best ever but... Im just saying.

Pitt? I don't think so. Probably a bad team this year. DePaul not likely to be as good as last year, same with SJU, Oklahoma and UNC.

 

[doggydaddy]

Pitt? I don't think so. Probably a bad team this year. DePaul not likely to be as good as last year, same with SJU, Oklahoma and UNC.

His point is that if Tennessee can lose to an unranked team, then Uconn can certainly lose to ranked teams.

So we shouldn't count on those wins.

 

[Aluminny69]

Contrary to popular opinion, internet postings have little to no effect on the outcome of WCBB games.

 

[Wonkster]

feels like a non sequitur.... did I miss a discussion about eggs over easy?

.
If you count your eggs over easy before they hatch, is the result higher or lower than if you count them after they hatch?

(Chorus in the background singing 'Gaudeamus Non Sequitur' by Brahms)
.

 

[meyers7]

Contrary to popular opinion, internet postings have little to no effect on the outcome of WCBB games.

What? Are you being serious here? Or is this some kind of bad joke?

 

[Aluminny69]

What? Are you being serious here? Or is this some kind of bad joke?

Yes, it was clearly tongue in cheek. However, I am very curious as to how you might have interpreted it as a "bad" joke? How did you mean "bad", distasteful or humorless?