Do you believe K's line as they shook hands "I was really happy for him" ? Who does he think he is, that fellow in the bible?I hate Duke but have a hard time hating K.
That's the thing: Given the limitations, I thought they did an excellent job portraying many different aspects and perspectives of the man. And it wasn't all glowing, which I especially appreciated.I have to say for 1 hour they covered a lot of ground...Makes me want a 5 hour special on Calhoun.
Can't wait for @gampelcrazies to upload special.That's the thing: Given the limitations, I thought they did an excellent job portraying many different aspects and perspectives of the man. And it wasn't all glowing, which I especially appreciated.
Fully agree that I could easily watch several hours and/or a multi-episode series about him. I am not a Jacobs fan at all--far from it--but I do respect that he acknowledged that Calhoun was always compelling, never left you with an empty notebook, and is a complex subject worthy of a multi-volume treatise by a renowned historical scholar in order to understand him fully. Short of that though, I thought they did about as good of a job as possible distilling the essence of the man in one hour.
Can't wait for @gampelcrazies to upload special.
My impression of notables:
Bobby Knight admires JC.
Coach K respects JC.
Boeheim looks down on JC.
JJ despises JC.
I know what he says publicly. I just don't believe he's sincere.Boeheim was just on Francesa the other day. Both agreed Calhoun was the most underrated coach of all time and I believe Boeheim said he was one of the top 3 college basketball coaches of all time.
Can't wait for @gampelcrazies to upload special.
My impression of notables:
Bobby Knight admires JC.
Coach K respects JC.
Boeheim looks down on JC.
JJ despises JC.
The article JJ wrote about the UNC infractions tells me more about JJ's real feelings regarding JC than anything I'm getting from this special. Of course I haven't seen the special yet. I'm just processing what people are writing in this thread.There was nothing from Knight in the special, which surprised me somewhat, but understandable given the time limitations. JC did repeat the well-worn story about the advice Knight gave him about coming to UConn in the first instance, but that was it in terms of Knight.
Tons of K stuff. He said all the right things. Most notable for me were his comments about his feelings at the end of the Laettner game (felt elated, then sad for us; in hindsight he feels it was the story of two "lifers" who would play this out on the national stage for decades to come); and his "if that's tough love, I want to be tough-loved" comment, which was funny and poignant.
Boeheim credited JC with the greatest program building job in basketball history, but the rest was generic fluff from him.
JJ was more gracious than I expected him to be. I don't think he despises him at all. I think he was/is obsessed with him.
Don't disagree at all about the Boeheim instinct. That's why I was somewhat surprised to hear him credit JC with the "best" anything; he's usually much more equivocal and weaselly.The article JJ wrote about the UNC infractions tells me more about JJ's real feelings regarding JC than anything I'm getting from this special. Of course I haven't seen the special yet. I'm just processing what people are writing in this thread.
With regards to Boeheim, my statement reflects what my wife has picked up observing his interaction with JC. She's not a Cuse hater. But every time she sees Boeheim she feels strongly that the relationship between him and JC is one in which JC genuinely likes JB but the friendship is not reciprocated. Furthermore JB actually dislikes JC. I usually trust the feminine instinct regarding the nature of people far more than what dudes think. And in this particular instance, because she's indifferent to Syracuse or Boeheims coaching, I feel she's unbiased with this feeling.
We all know people who talk others up when they're in the presence of that person but love putting them down in other situations. That's JJ's and JB's modus operandi with JC. JC is aware of who JJ is but not JB.
That analysis about JJ was more than armchair. Quite incredible and right on the mark imo. Could not give you enough likes to express my admiration with the way you stated it.Don't disagree at all about the Boeheim instinct. That's why I was somewhat surprised to hear him credit JC with the "best" anything; he's usually much more equivocal and weaselly.
I'm as willing to believe the worst about Jacobs as anyone and I cringed when they first showed him last night because I didn't want him having any part of this production. But the more they showed of him the more I felt that his feelings about JC were more complex than I had assumed. I think he simultaneously fears him, admires him, respects him, is confused by him, felt jilted by him, was/is jealous of him, and ultimately unjustly criticized and was angry at him for being human, i.e., imperfect. It's that last part that is hardest to unpack. Playing armchair psychiatrist, I'll say that I put a lot of stock in the notion that the things we dislike most about those closest to us are oftentimes the things we most dislike about ourselves. That, and controversy sells a lot more papers than praise does.
With regards to Boeheim, my statement reflects what my wife has picked up observing his interaction with JC. She's not a Cuse hater. But every time she sees Boeheim she feels strongly that the relationship between him and JC is one in which JC genuinely likes JB but the friendship is not reciprocated. Furthermore JB actually dislikes JC. I usually trust the feminine instinct regarding the nature of people far more than what dudes think. And in this particular instance, because she's indifferent to Syracuse or Boeheims coaching, I feel she's unbiased with this feeling.
I will be uploading it

There was a clip of Ollie screaming after beating Kentucky in the title game...I've never scene that before. Nice.
Don't disagree at all about the Boeheim instinct. That's why I was somewhat surprised to hear him credit JC with the "best" anything; he's usually much more equivocal and weaselly.
I'm as willing to believe the worst about Jacobs as anyone and I cringed when they first showed him last night because I didn't want him having any part of this production. But the more they showed of him the more I felt that his feelings about JC were more complex than I had assumed. I think he simultaneously fears him, admires him, respects him, is confused by him, felt jilted by him, was/is jealous of him, and ultimately unjustly criticized and was angry at him for being human, i.e., imperfect. It's that last part that is hardest to unpack. Playing armchair psychiatrist, I'll say that I put a lot of stock in the notion that the things we dislike most about those closest to us are oftentimes the things we most dislike about ourselves. That, and controversy sells a lot more papers than praise does.
Haven't seen the show yet, but I GGuessing it's the clip from my.avatar?

Haven't seen the show yet, but I GGuessing it's the clip from my.avatar?
8893 said:From what I heard at the time from those in position to know, K was gracious about '99 and truly believed that we beat them and deserved the win. In 2004, however, he was bitter as hell, essentially inconsolable after the game, because he thought the refs stole the game from them. I loved both reactions.
Hoophound said:I can see his gripe on the Reddick no call at the end, but nothing else. Even then, the Reddick no call is totally debatable. We were robbed of Emeka in the first half and those ticky tack fouls bordered on criminal.
For me it comes down to JC's decision to sit Emeka with two fouls in the first half. As he put it, he learned a long time ago that basketball games are 40 minutes long. We got jobbed early and sucked it up. K got jobbed and took his chances. JC saved his bullets and got the match-up he wanted. I'll never forget watching Emeka from across the court as he could barely contain himself when he had to sit. Knees bobbing up and down furiously.I can see his gripe on the Reddick no call at the end, but nothing else. Even then, the Reddick no call is totally debatable. We were robbed of Emeka in the first half and those ticky tack fouls bordered on criminal.
Gurleyman said:There was never a definitive replay of that Rashad swipe. It's like Schrodinger's reach-in. Can be thought of as a foul and not a foul, only the box will never be opened.
Jacobs was one of the few reporters who had the nerve to challenge JC. I may not agree with everything he wrote but coaches are control freaks and reporters like Jacobs provide a needed balance.That analysis about JJ was more than armchair. Quite incredible and right on the mark imo. Could not give you enough likes to express my admiration with the way you stated it.