- Joined
- Apr 16, 2020
- Messages
- 1,916
- Reaction Score
- 3,193
How effective is it as a strategy? Examples: Deliberate technicals, constant questioning of most calls, sarcasm after a non-call.
If habitual(game after game), do referees get intimidated and "balance out the calls" for the rest of the game, or do they not care and even look for an excuse to T up the coach and get him thrown out?
Do referees remember and hold it against that particular coach for the other games on the schedule that they referee?
If habitual(game after game), do referees get intimidated and "balance out the calls" for the rest of the game, or do they not care and even look for an excuse to T up the coach and get him thrown out?
Do referees remember and hold it against that particular coach for the other games on the schedule that they referee?