This isn't 1954 - not like the only way recruits can see a team play is by the one game on a recruiting visit. They've likely seen high-profile teams play enough already - they visit campus to meet the team, check out chicks, see what the atmosphere is like, etc. - they're 16-17. They aren't sitting there with a scratch pad scientifically charting X's and O's.
The coaches can slap together a DVD of all the different post plays we have from game action this season and show Govan 37 different ways we could get him the ball on the low block in five minutes, even if the plays didn't amount to anything in this year's game action. "See, right here, Amida can't keep his position on the low block and has to kick it back out. Or we run a great set here for Tyler, but he gets his shot blocked because he isn't a good finisher. But If we run that play for you, you can go to work. We expect you to get us buckets."
The worst thing would have been for the place to be half-full and for the atmosphere to suck. Then it would lend credence to the idea planted by rival recruiters that our conference affiliation is causing enthusiasm to drop off. Losing a game doesn't matter much, other than the intangible factor that a place going bananas after winning a close game could make an impact on an impressionable mind. But that's always an inherent risk of bringing recruits to games.