Okay, now I've seen it. Pretty slow to get going. Cinematography is great, many beautiful images of the river, pyramids, humongous statues, sunrises, etc. Emma Mackey was smoldering, she pretty much made it worth watching. I really like her in the Netflix series "Sex Education" and she was good here as well. Some of the cast weren't particularly interesting. I think it's just an Agatha Christie thing, needlessly complicated plots with pretty much every character seeming guilty of committing the crime appears to be the way she rolls. It was okay, but only that. There were definitely some changes from the book, I read it at some point the last few years. I know the ending was a big departure.Haven't gotten a chance to watch it yet, but brand new streaming on Hulu is the new Kenneth Branagh version of "Death on the Nile." Hulu does get some stuff before it's out on DVD.
Madeline Swann (Lea Seydoux)
Only 2 reasons to bother with this film at all. The rest is a heaping bag of meh.Ana de Armas just owns one of the more amazing dresses of all time
The cars are cool, and the location in Italy. But yeah, mostly aesthetic.Only 2 reasons to bother with this film at all. The rest is a heaping bag of meh.
Watched a couple of recent war flicks over the weekend. 1944 is a film about Estonia being caught between the Nazis and Russians, each of whom conscripted Estonians to fight for them, leading to relatives and friends fighting relatives and friends. Battle scenes are very well done. It's not really plot-driven, more of an exploration of the challenges faced by Baltic states during WWII. Acting seemed decent enough but Amazon only gives the option for English overdub, which is pretty bad. Had they left it in Estonian with English subtitles it might've been even more compelling.
T-34 is a very good war movie cloaked within a nationalist Russian propaganda message. It's the story of an exceptional Russian tank commander who gets taken POW and uses an opportunity offered by his captors to use a captured T-34 tank to teach newly conscripted Nazi soldiers how to operate tanks in combat. He is reunited with some of his former tank crew and they decide they're going to use the tank to make a break for the Czech border, which was controlled by Russia. There's a lot of attention to detail, such as what it's really like to be inside a tank during battle. The tank crew offers plenty of dark humor and are the types of characters you'd want to go into battle with. This is one I'd watch again. While the plot may seem unbelievable, the story is convincing, the acting is good, and it's an enjoyable ride.
No Time To Die. 2021. Bond. Rewatch of movie we saw in the cinema. Impression is the same. Story drags on too long. Somehow, an unimpressive guy (Rami Malek) wipes out Spectre, which CIA and MI6 couldn't manage. Then he threatens the whole world, and Bond of course has to stop him. Among the most ridiculous Bond plots yet. Positive notes: the love interest with Bond and Madeline Swann (Lea Seydoux) is pretty good. Her backstory that starts the movie is well done. The scenes with them in Italy are spectacular. Bond's house in the Caribbean is pretty sweet. The Aston Martins are awesome. Ana de Armas just owns one of the more amazing dresses of all time and kills like 20 guys while in it. Holy cow. My wife said "she's just so pretty". Yes. Anyway, we all have to suspend disbelief and accept the absurd in a Bond film, this one asks us to do it a little more than was reasonable or necessary. If you can accept that, proceed.
Have to at least get to Ana de Armas in Havana.I’m generally a huge Bond fan and an exceptionally easy sell on these and for some reason I have started this movie probably 4 times and have yet to make it more than an hour. Maybe I’ll give it one more shot. Opening flashback is certainly creepy as hell.
Good director, good movie.Ford vs. Ferrari
For whatever reason the descriptions of this movie didn’t make it sound all that appealing to me. I finally watched it last night, though. It was incredibly good from start to finish.
Sometimes I get a sense that a lot of the movies that are being put out are being chugged out just for the purpose of creating on demand content. There’s a ton of stuff out there that you watch and think to yourself man they really did not give a crap about this movie. Then periodically and you find a gem among the crap. Leave No Trace comes to mind as a good example.What has happened to indie film making? Maybe I'm just on an unlucky streak, but I've seen several recently that were TERRIBLE. "Warning," "Silent Night," and "John and the Hole" were all a complete waste of time. Dull and totally pointless. Who are these writers, directors, producers? Just bad, bad film making. They all had decent casts, but nothing to work with.
Agreed, definitely a gem.Leave No Trace comes to mind as a good example.
You're not including Almost Famous as a good movie?I will be brief. Every Cameron Crowe movie is a derivative of Singles or Jerry McGuire. Which might be his only good movies.
You're not including Almost Famous as a good movie?
I've seen criticism of Aloha before. I found it decently entertaining. Compared to the absolute garbage I keep seeing that was produced during the covid era, it's practically a masterpiece.
You're not including Almost Famous as a good movie?
I've seen criticism of Aloha before. I found it decently entertaining. Compared to the absolute garbage I keep seeing that was produced during the covid era, it's practically a masterpiece.