- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,464
- Reaction Score
- 16,425
Can't stop anyone but I was hoping this wouldn't turn into that other "Lyle" thread. Moving forward!
I talked to Diaco about this. He slightly misunderstood my question, as I was really moreso just curious about whether we had enough depth or would be seeking a walk-on to avoid blowing a redshirt. With that being said, his comments to me were very close to what Des is saying.
I asked how many RB's they had and he said "five". He did not include Clax. He talked about some positives of each RB, but from my amateur psychology skills, my prediction is that if the season started today...
1.) Marriner
2.) Max
3.) Arkeel
4.) McAllister
5.) Johnson
As many above have said, I don't think listing Arkeel as 3 is really right since its not the role he would play. He'd have his own packages and plays that would highlight his strengths, but I can't imagine that he's being seriously considered as the #1 20 carry TB.
Part of the equation is how do others perform. If Marriner is as good as some people thought, then you don't need to play Newsome or someone else. If Max is playing well, you can redshirt Johnson since they are similar. As I said before I think McAllister might be the most polished and the most ready coming out of a prep program. He faced college recruits ever game. I think there were 2 others on his team. Doesn't mean he will be the best player over his career. Just the most ready to play in 2014.
I think Max and Marriner are going to split carries with Max getting most of them in the beginning of the season. I think Marriner emerges as the starter by the middle or the end of the season, he's going to be a really good back, Diaco said he's maybe the strongest player on the team. I also believe one of the three freshmens will get some touches and I think it'll be either Newsome or McAlister. We're not desperate at the RB position to have a freshmen start unless there was some injuries.