- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 7,062
- Reaction Score
- 17,817
Jimmy Serrano said:Superfan post of the day.
Best 11 yards I ever saw. And the capacity crowd of 13 got to hug him after the game.
Jimmy Serrano said:Superfan post of the day.
How about walkon Paul James?Always gotta be careful with kids who have yet to set foot on campus. You just never know. Does anyone remember the name "Savon Huggins"?
Agree,love Max...he's gonna be special in a punishing,bruising way!!Max is gonna run for 1,200 yards this year. His style of running + Foley's style of OLine = 1,200+ yards. Take it to the bank, and remember that I told you about it when he does it!
Totally agree about one guy leaving the pack behind. We saw it in person just over a decade ago. Three talented backs arrived in Storrs & when the dust cleared there was no question that Terry Caulley was the best of the bunch.There is plenty of talent. What is proven time and time again is a guy will emerge and breakout from the others. Newsome and Max would be a good combination, but we really only have one traditional style fullback. Getting a fullback into the mix will be important to bring support to the oline.
I agree that the staff will try to redshirt as many of these guys as they can. Contrary to the general opinion in the Valley, BYU's defensive front is a hair better than Naugy's. Its possible that we could see one of the 3 frosh this year, but I think that will depend largely on how the rest of the backs perform. If I were guessing, McAllister gets the call for 2 reasons. He is reportedly the most "polished" of the 3, and he is coming from a prep program where he played against generally higher level competition (Suffield had 3 guys go to D1A programs and has generally puts a couple of kids a year into 1A.It also has post grad players as do most other members of their league. And when considering McAlister's production keep in mind that the preps play 8 games during the regular season and 1 post season if you qualify, not 14-15 like some Ct high schools.) Long term I'm not sure he'll be the best of the 3. Just the most ready to step in this year. But I think a lot will depend on how well steps up. Max is what he is in my mind. A steady, between the tackles runner, but limited.By my look: Scholarship tailbacks are: DeLorenzo (RJr), Mariner (RF). Scholarship fullbacks are: Clax (RF), Walsh (So).
Walsh still has a redshirt year available, as will obviously, all incoming backs: (Johnson, McAllister and Newsome)
Got a couple players listed on the roster that aren't scholarship - I think. Contrary to popular opinion, my guess is that the coaching staff is going to try to keep the shirts on the incoming RB class. Those 3 will need to demonstrate something real special that can't be kept off the field to play, or we're going to have to get real deep down the chart for medical reasons. On another note, It's amazing how thin this roster is, in many places, bu it's getting better slowly over the past 2 seasons. Got to wonder when the class of 2015 will start to come together publicly.
For this season, I'm very much looking forward to seeing what #26 can do, and continuing to watch #44 ending up on top of tacklers falling forward.
Contrary to the general opinion in the Valley, BYU's defensive front is a hair better than Naugy's.
Yeah, huh. They don't have to worry about extra money for players at BYU. Most are already collecting Social Security by the time they are sophomores.Not to mention being 10 years older.
I talked to Diaco about this. He slightly misunderstood my question, as I was really moreso just curious about whether we had enough depth or would be seeking a walk-on to avoid blowing a redshirt. With that being said, his comments to me were very close to what Des is saying.
I asked how many RB's they had and he said "five". He did not include Clax. He talked about some positives of each RB, but from my amateur psychology skills, my prediction is that if the season started today...
1.) Marriner
2.) Max
3.) Arkeel
4.) McAllister
5.) Johnson
As many above have said, I don't think listing Arkeel as 3 is really right since its not the role he would play. He'd have his own packages and plays that would highlight his strengths, but I can't imagine that he's being seriously considered as the #1 20 carry TB.
I doubt that. I suspect one will play. Not sure how much or in what capacity, and I aagree kick returning was an issue, but what wasn't an issue last year. But most running backs redshirt. Donald Brown redshirted. The only reason Caulley didn't was that at the time we had nobody else. And Edsall sat him against better teams to protect him. Todman was really the only guy who didn't. Walsh played as a freshman at fullback but that was because Pasqualoni was an idiot.I guess it's mathmatically possible that none of the freshman running backs would play but that seems extremely unlikely.
No point in redshirting running backs anyway. So many of them are never better than they are as freshman.
This team didn't exactly light it up on returns last year either - I wouldn't be surprised if all three of them play in some capacity.
Part of the equation is how do others perform. If Marriner is as good as some people thought, then you don't need to play Newsome or someone else. If Max is playing well, you can redshirt Johnson since they are similar. As I said before I think McAllister might be the most polished and the most ready coming out of a prep program. He faced college recruits ever game. I think there were 2 others on his team. Doesn't mean he will be the best player over his career. Just the most ready to play in 2014.I talked to Diaco about this. He slightly misunderstood my question, as I was really moreso just curious about whether we had enough depth or would be seeking a walk-on to avoid blowing a redshirt. With that being said, his comments to me were very close to what Des is saying.
I asked how many RB's they had and he said "five". He did not include Clax. He talked about some positives of each RB, but from my amateur psychology skills, my prediction is that if the season started today...
1.) Marriner
2.) Max
3.) Arkeel
4.) McAlliste
5.) Johnson
As many above have said, I don't think listing Arkeel as 3 is really right since its not the role he would play. He'd have his own packages and plays that would highlight his strengths, but I can't imagine that he's being seriously considered as the #1 20 carry TB.
I can't imagine Diaco is going to redshirt anyone who can help them win games in 2014. The roster is a threadbare he is in no position to play for 2018.
Lyle was a good pass blocker? Someone forgot to tell him.UConn ready to hit ground running without McCombs
http://runwayramblings.blogspot.com/2014/06/uconn-ready-to-hit-ground-running.html
Lyle was a good pass blocker? Someone forgot to tell him.
I don't disagree with this for a second. But having watched a coach, really a couple of them, burn redshirts of guys who really weren't ready to step in and contribute in a significant way last year(Can you say Tim Boyle?), I hope Diaco is cautious in that area. I think he will be. If you use a true freshman he needs to be able to make you better, not just fill a slot.I can't imagine Diaco is going to redshirt anyone who can help them win games in 2014. The roster is a threadbare he is in no position to play for 2018.
Lyle was a good pass blocker? Someone forgot to tell him.
I don't disagree with this for a second. But having watched a coach, really a couple of them, burn redshirts of guys who really weren't ready to step in and contribute in a significant way last year(Can you say Tim Boyle?), I hope Diaco is cautious in that area. I think he will be. If you use a true freshman he needs to be able to make you better, not just fill a slot.
I've said this from his first day. I thought last year he showed his willingness to do whatever he was asked when he ended up returning punts and kickoffs. They needed someone who would not misplay the ball and he didn't. he wasn't a great return guy but nobody else did much either. He also became a very solid pass blocker. He couldn't take out 4-5 rushers which the lookout technique that George taught often led to, but he was a better pass blocker than any other running back who saw action.When he first saw the field he was an absolute liability in pass protection. His improvement was very quick and dramatic, especially given his size. Lyle played with a lot of heart. I really think the prior regime misused him. He was never a back to carry the ball 25-30 times and by the time GDL had thoroughly duck*ed the OL he just had not chance to be productive.
I've said this from his first day. I thought last year he showed his willingness to do whatever he was asked when he ended up returning punts and kickoffs. They needed someone who would not misplay the ball and he didn't. he wasn't a great return guy but nobody else did much either. He also became a very solid pass blocker. He couldn't take out 4-5 rushers which the lookout technique that George taught often led to, but he was a better pass blocker than any other running back who saw action.