Its a way of flushing out the makeup of the team. I was never the best player on any team I ever played on, I wasn't so naive to think so, it didn't make me feel less important to the team. These guys have been at this a long time, if they are reading the boneyard, and I doubt they are, I really think the wouldn't give a rats ass about what a bunch of armchair quarterbacks thought about them.What is the benefit to doing this, make certain players feel bad. What a stupid idea, teams win not players! Haven't we proven that 4 times already.
What is the benefit to doing this, make certain players feel bad. What a stupid idea, teams win not players! Haven't we proven that 4 times already.
1.Purvis
2.DHam
3.Gibbs
4.Brimah
5.Adams
6.Miller
7.Omar
8.Facey
9.Cassell
10.Nolan
I think Purvis puts it together this year and I still believe he is our most talented player. I think Purvis could go for something like 18 4 and 4 this year with Hamilton around 13 5 and 5 not a big difference but I'll take Purvis by a hair. I'd take Purvis and DHam against pretty much any wing pairing we've ever had.
Dude, there is virtually no way this happens, and I'll bet my house against it.1.Purvis . . . I think Purvis puts it together this year and I still believe he is our most talented player. I think Purvis could go for something like 18 4 and 4 this year
Purvis averaged over 17ppg in March, and scored somewhere between 13-15 from 2/1 on (16 games).Dude, there is virtually no way this happens, and I'll bet my house against it.
He scored 8 and then 11 ppg in his first two years.
He had 2.4 rebounds and 1.2/1.3 assists in his first two years.
There is zero chance he adds 7 pts per game, doubles his rebounding, and triples his assists. He is a scorer, pure and simple, and he hasn't, and won't, bring much more than that.
And that's OKAY. We need Purvis to spot score and to play at least good D, and not bone head TOs.
Dude, there is virtually no way this happens, and I'll bet my house against it.
He scored 8 and then 11 ppg in his first two years.
He had 2.4 rebounds and 1.2/1.3 assists in his first two years.
There is zero chance he adds 7 pts per game, doubles his rebounding, and triples his assists. He is a scorer, pure and simple, and he hasn't, and won't, bring much more than that.
And that's OKAY. We need Purvis to spot score and to play at least good D, and not bone head TOs.
With Gibbs, Hamilton, and Adams, we have a much better scoring team, and, if anything, his offense will be less required, not more.
When you throw in that his FT shooting is awful, I see our crunch time lineup as Gibbs/Adams/DHam/Brimah/Miller.
Once again, however, I believe that too much is being expected of this young man. I'll be very happy to ee him get 12/2/2 with a reduction of 1 or 2 bone head plays a game.
This is an extremely tough exercise, because honestly, any of our top six could be #1 and I wouldn't be surprised. I'll give it a try...
1. Hamilton - I've already spilled thousands of words on him, but I'll make it simple: 13 players were ranked ahead of him in the class of 2014. Only one of them is playing college basketball next season.
2. Miller - Dominant defensive rebounder, can guard 1-5, can operate in the middle of a zone, space the floor with mid-range jumpers...oh, and he shoots 83% at the foul line.
3. Gibbs - Might be #1 if he were a better defender. Without his shooting, it would be difficult to envision us constructing a championship level offense.
4. Brimah - He's probably #1 - in terms of value - if we made this list last year, and I wouldn't object to anybody ranking him #1 this year. However, I think the potential to install Miller as a small ball five makes him slightly less vital.
5. Adams - His emergence as a secondary facilitator will be crucial, and will allow Gibbs to work off the ball more.
6. Purvis - Real wild card. If he's the player he was in the final eight he could win AAC POY. If he's the player he was before that, he'll sit crunch time.
7. Facey - I see him playing spot minutes at center this season. I think people are sleeping on him - he can do some things defensively (switching onto the perimeter) that make him extremely valuable as the first big off the bench, and he's more polished offensively than people realize.
8. Omar/Cassell - One of these guys is going to play minutes and the other isn't. It's probably as simple as who makes shots. Cassell adds more as a ball-handler/passer, Omar is more valuable as a slasher.
9. Nolan - He'll be better than he was last year, when he played injured. He's an important piece to have because he knows the schemes and because of AB's inevitable foul trouble.
10. Enoch - Don't see him playing many minutes.
This is an extremely tough exercise, because honestly, any of our top six could be #1 and I wouldn't be surprised. I'll give it a try...
1. Hamilton - I've already spilled thousands of words on him, but I'll make it simple: 13 players were ranked ahead of him in the class of 2014. Only one of them is playing college basketball next season.
2. Miller - Dominant defensive rebounder, can guard 1-5, can operate in the middle of a zone, space the floor with mid-range jumpers...oh, and he shoots 83% at the foul line.
3. Gibbs - Might be #1 if he were a better defender. Without his shooting, it would be difficult to envision us constructing a championship level offense.
4. Brimah - He's probably #1 - in terms of value - if we made this list last year, and I wouldn't object to anybody ranking him #1 this year. However, I think the potential to install Miller as a small ball five makes him slightly less vital.
5. Adams - His emergence as a secondary facilitator will be crucial, and will allow Gibbs to work off the ball more.
6. Purvis - Real wild card. If he's the player he was in the final eight he could win AAC POY. If he's the player he was before that, he'll sit crunch time.
7. Facey - I see him playing spot minutes at center this season. I think people are sleeping on him - he can do some things defensively (switching onto the perimeter) that make him extremely valuable as the first big off the bench, and he's more polished offensively than people realize.
8. Omar/Cassell - One of these guys is going to play minutes and the other isn't. It's probably as simple as who makes shots. Cassell adds more as a ball-handler/passer, Omar is more valuable as a slasher.
9. Nolan - He'll be better than he was last year, when he played injured. He's an important piece to have because he knows the schemes and because of AB's inevitable foul trouble.
10. Enoch - Don't see him playing many minutes.
I can't remember exactly where(I believe it was a michigan site), but someone checked the synergy stats on Miller and he was a below average midrange jump shooter last year. I don't think that's really his game.
Purvis averaged over 17ppg in March, and scored somewhere between 13-15 from 2/1 on (16 games).
I wouldn't put money on him averaging 18ppg, but I'm of the belief that something clicked for the kid, and that the injuries hurt him early.
I would put 14ppg as the floor, and say he'll be closer to 16-17ppg. He's our most explosive athlete, he shot well from range, and if he starts actually making his FTs he's going to get a ton of buckets.
As for your points about assists and rebounds...yeah, I'm with you on that.
Yeah, I'm of the mind that if Adams is pushing someone out of the lineup at crunch time, it's going to be one of our bigs. I know that's not popular, but Hamilton can ball, Gibbs is going to be our leading baller, and I think we're going to see March Purvis most of the year.Agree with everything you wrote. Something did click for Purv. The guy slashing into the lane and scoring in the conference tournament was an entirely different player from the guy who would drive and throw the ball up for grabs early and mid-year. He also closed the regular season on a 4 game 15-19 run at the foul line. He may never be an 80% guy but I'm optimistic that he'll be in the 70's this year.
Even if people aren't as bullish on Purvis' offense, I don't see how he'll be the odd man out at crunch time. You have to play defense at crunch time too. By the end of the year he had turned into a pretty solid defender, and I think his physicality and athleticism will make him the #1 option to stick the opponent's best non-big scorer down the stretch.
Dude, there is virtually no way this happens, and I'll bet my house against it.
He scored 8 and then 11 ppg in his first two years.
He had 2.4 rebounds and 1.2/1.3 assists in his first two years.
There is zero chance he adds 7 pts per game, doubles his rebounding, and triples his assists. He is a scorer, pure and simple, and he hasn't, and won't, bring much more than that.
And that's OKAY. We need Purvis to spot score and to play at least good D, and not bone head TOs.
With Gibbs, Hamilton, and Adams, we have a much better scoring team, and, if anything, his offense will be less required, not more.
When you throw in that his FT shooting is awful, I see our crunch time lineup as Gibbs/Adams/DHam/Brimah/Miller.
Once again, however, I believe that too much is being expected of this young man. I'll be very happy to ee him get 12/2/2 with a reduction of 1 or 2 bone head plays a game.
Purvis averaged over 17ppg in March, and scored somewhere between 13-15 from 2/1 on (16 games).
I wouldn't put money on him averaging 18ppg, but I'm of the belief that something clicked for the kid, and that the injuries hurt him early.
I would put 14ppg as the floor, and say he'll be closer to 16-17ppg. He's our most explosive athlete, he shot well from range, and if he starts actually making his FTs he's going to get a ton of buckets.
As for your points about assists and rebounds...yeah, I'm with you on that.
Purvis is a good defender, and he can easily transition between SG and SF.You guys pretty much covered it. Purvis is not a well-rounded basketball player -- he may score, but he won't contribute much else. He might not average more than 4 rebounds and assists combined. That said, if he can be an efficient scorer at the 2/3 and avoid hurting us in other ways, that will be a big boost.
Hamilton rebounds and passes exceptionally well for a 3, which makes up for Purvis's deficiencies. Miller is also a versatile guy at the 4 who is both a rebounding machine and unafraid to shoot or drive to the hole.
I actually think one of Purvis or Brimah will be on the bench at crunch time, depending on whether we want to go big or small.
That could be, but I guess I assumed he'd be at least a viable midrange jump shooter given the following: 1) He shot a respectable 50% from two at Cornell last year. 2.) He was the #1 option, and so, I would imagine that with every easy shot he took, he took another contested one. 3.) He shot 83% from the line, which tends to be a good indicator of somebody who can hit intermediate shots with time and space (which he should have a lot more of).
If the synergy numbers prove me wrong I'll be willing to concede the point, I'd just be interested in taking a closer look at his shot type (i.e., how many were catch and shoot vs. off the dribble, how many were contested vs. uncontested, etc.) before I give up on him having an Adrien like impact.
Based on what?Purvis is a good defender . . .
Fail.If its any of the bottom 4 UConn is going to awfully good or .....
Larrier has to sit out this year as transfer. He can only participate in practice. I guess it could be said he might still be a very valuable player playing high-level in practice making the rest of our players better.I didn't see Terry Larrier's name mentioned at all. Does this mean that he's at the top of the list & needs no introduction?