I am confused as to what
@James said that has caused such an uproar. Purvis's wingspan and poor ball handling is a completely relevant reason for him not being our top player. In some cases we are putting him before our all conference big man and our newly acquired all big east 1st team transfer PG who led his conference in 3 pt %.[/QUOTE]
James is one of the dudes who has a good understanding of bb. Read a lot of his stuff.
I thought I've seen you in the chat room. If not, or maybe I'm misremembering things, there is a lot of similarity between James/Purvis as there is between Chief00/Dyson. Well I won't go that far. That would be like saying a drop of water is an ocean. But there is some thing about Purvis that is personal for several people and it seems to me to be more than just his shortcomings as a player. This thread is tame to what happens over the season and what you read in the chatroom during a game time. So the push back must sound weird to some.
Seems every year we have a player in which a segment of the forum goes out of the way to treat like they are on Syracuse's team. It's rarely the same posters. And sometimes two or three players get this treatment. But generally speaking one player really becomes the whipping poster child.
If you read a post by the gold standard of bb analysis,
@Gurleyman, you get an in depth understanding of all the moving parts, with equal emphasis of the pros and cons of players abilities and the teams ability to handle players shortcomings or not. He does it patiently and without vitriol. He doesn't deride other posters and doesn't deride players. Well he did have one Moby Dick weakness. But otherwise the guy is incredible.