More like Jim Delaney's!The next AD should be Jack Swarbrick's mistress.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
soooo what lew perkins been up to these days?
soooo what lew perkins been up to these days?
doesn't reek of anything other than cutting people who haven't done squadoosh. if governments ran more like that, cities, states, etc. would be in much better shape.I'm sorry, but does anybody else think that this reeks of a hack job? She comes in, and all of the sudden, multiple high level officials at the university "retire" or leave, so people think she's rooting out inefficiency, but is she really? Does she really have "a plan for the future", "moving fast in the right direction", or is she just firing people to make herself look good? Obviously Hathaway had to go, but the Provost and several others? Something about all this reeks to me and I'll be interested to see if she has an long term success, instead of just "letting go" of higher-ups.
I think Herbst is on the right track, but the scam in academia is these guys get promoted to dean/provost/whatever, go back to 'just' teaching, but get paid at the same rate as the dean or provost. Reason no. 9,999 why college is so expensive.
you'd seek other employment because you're thinking like someone that's not an employee in public academia.
They don't get paid the same rate. Salary drops once you leave administrative positions. That even applies for chairs of departments.
The national average for administration is 1% of the budget.
Usually in the upstater camp but afraid we're going to agree to disagree on this issue. Anecdotally know a couple of folks who didn't get a pay cut. Overall, 839 at UConn made over $100K in 2010. No prob with coaches getting market rate (and JC is underpaid, IMO) because they bring in money. I'm sure there are a lot of talented people on this list, but this seems a bit much.
http://www.ctsunlight.org/Payroll/tabid/56/Default.aspx?BRANCHID=
Usually in the upstater camp but afraid we're going to agree to disagree on this issue. Anecdotally know a couple of folks who didn't get a pay cut. Overall, 839 at UConn made over $100K in 2010. No prob with coaches getting market rate (and JC is underpaid, IMO) because they bring in money. I'm sure there are a lot of talented people on this list, but this seems a bit much.
http://www.ctsunlight.org/Payroll/tabid/56/Default.aspx?BRANCHID=
While I have no idea if this is the right move or not... might she be better served by one public lynching at a time?
You think other universities are going to hire a 60 something ex-Provost to teach? Very unlikely.
If he truly wants to teach, it wouldn't happen elsewhere.
By the way, why differentiate between public academics and private academics? What's the difference?
Rutgers president McCormick resigned last year to take on a teaching job still paying 335k/year. do you think that would have happened at a private university. in the article they also mention that the former provost is currently working as a poli sci professor making $320k/year. maybe it would have but i'd assume private schools scrutinize their spending more, and i doubt they'd be paying a poli sci prof $320k unless they hired a serious political heavyweight for the position. maybe i'm just jaded because i live in NJ were public anything means the public is getting screwed in the contracts
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/rutgers_president_will_return.html
A good percentage of those earning more than $100K are MD's working at the UConn Health Center.Usually in the upstater camp but afraid we're going to agree to disagree on this issue. Anecdotally know a couple of folks who didn't get a pay cut. Overall, 839 at UConn made over $100K in 2010. No prob with coaches getting market rate (and JC is underpaid, IMO) because they bring in money. I'm sure there are a lot of talented people on this list, but this seems a bit much.
http://www.ctsunlight.org/Payroll/tabid/56/Default.aspx?BRANCHID=
Rutgers president McCormick resigned last year to take on a teaching job still paying 335k/year. do you think that would have happened at a private university. in the article they also mention that the former provost is currently working as a poli sci professor making $320k/year. maybe it would have but i'd assume private schools scrutinize their spending more, and i doubt they'd be paying a poli sci prof $320k unless they hired a serious political heavyweight for the position. maybe i'm just jaded because i live in NJ were public anything means the public is getting screwed in the contracts
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/06/rutgers_president_will_return.html
Didn't the last one happen over six months ago?
How was Hathaway's departure ugly on any level, let alone on any number of levels?Bottom line is I don't see anything out of the ordinary going on here, other than the Hathaway ouster. That was ugly on a number of levels.