why would the ACC merge with the BE when it is obvious that the ACC can pick off any teams they want from us?
Prepare yourselves . . .
- Thread starter PennStateRod
- Start date
- Status
why would the ACC merge with the BE when it is obvious that the ACC can pick off any teams they want from us?
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction Score
- 0
If syr, pitt, uconn, and another join acc, Consider it a merger, takeover, whatever you want. I hope Uconn finds it's way to that conference, the alternatives suck.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction Score
- 0
Big Ten priority is Texas and notre dame, it will worry about moving east after those two locked down.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,735
- Reaction Score
- 24,401
Why would they ACC merge AFTER they poach Pitt and Cuse?
If UConn and Rutgers join the ACC, Mizzou fans might be able to rejoice in the fact that the B1G is left with them as a one of the strongest options.
USF, Louisville, Cincinnati will probably form a conference with whatever is left of the Big 12. West Virginia will probably go to the SEC. And the SEC might also take in Louisville since Louisville is now one of the strongest options in the east for them.
USF, Louisville, Cincinnati will probably form a conference with whatever is left of the Big 12. West Virginia will probably go to the SEC. And the SEC might also take in Louisville since Louisville is now one of the strongest options in the east for them.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,802
- Reaction Score
- 15,840
The B1G wants Texas and ND. While it may happen, I absolutely cannot fathom the B1G, and the presidents of their big shot schools letting the conference sit idly by while the two kingpins, one of whom sits squarely in B1G territory, go to a lesser conference. All of this realignment makes little sense, but that REALLY makes no sense, even with the LHN and ND's NBC deal.
- Status