Potential All-American Guard Position | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Potential All-American Guard Position

Blakes and Crooks should both be on here too
Blakes and Crooks should both be on here too
I guess I was listing the voting order as I perceive it for the AP top 5 but for the WBCA team, yes both deserve strong consideration. At this point I am not inclined to state either is a serious contender for the AP 5 first team.

That can change if Blakes leads Vandy to some great upsets and/or Crooks wins Big 12 player of the Year while dominating both Baylor and TCU. Again, I am not optimistic on that but it is plausible
 
I guess I was listing the voting order as I perceive it for the AP top 5 but for the WBCA team, yes both deserve strong consideration. At this point I am not inclined to state either is a serious contender for the AP 5 first team.

That can change if Blakes leads Vandy to some great upsets and/or Crooks wins Big 12 player of the Year while dominating both Baylor and TCU. Again, I am not optimistic on that but it is plausible
Blakes might have work to do against top teams but Crooks solidified her spot as a real contender IMO with her complete domination of Iowa and Heiden/Stuelke inside. She leads the nation in scoring averaging more than a point per minute played and is shooting 72% from the floor for a top 10 team. Non-con often leads to inflated numbers but early in the year she’s on a short list of POY consideration and is getting a decent amount of media attention this season too.

I also think Edwards gets serious consideration from SC, more so than Latson.
 
@bballnut90 who would you take between Crooks and Edwards?

I’d take Edwards. Crooks has played against 7 quad 4 teams with only 3 being quasi legit-Marquette, Indiana and Iowa. I will wait to see how she does in the Big 12 slate before I say she truly AA worthy. I am not saying she’s not good and not worthy of consideration. I just think there are better players out there.
 
@bballnut90 who would you take between Crooks and Edwards?

I’d take Edwards. Crooks has played against 7 quad 4 teams with only 3 being quasi legit-Marquette, Indiana and Iowa. I will wait to see how she does in the Big 12 slate before I say she truly AA worthy. I am not saying she’s not good and not worthy of consideration. I just think there are better players out there.
Is Crooks a 4? I’ve always considered her a 5 because she camps in the paint. Betts? Beers? Okote?

Anyway, we have two thirds of a season to figure it out. Things are gonna get more competitive next month for everybody except Strong and UConn
 
Last edited:
@bballnut90 who would you take between Crooks and Edwards?

I’d take Edwards. Crooks has played against 7 quad 4 teams with only 3 being quasi legit-Marquette, Indiana and Iowa. I will wait to see how she does in the Big 12 slate before I say she truly AA worthy. I am not saying she’s not good and not worthy of consideration. I just think there are better players out there.
I’d take Edwards if I’m building a team but if we’re talking about who is having thus better season thus far I’d pick Crooks. As @visitingcock noted it’s still early in the season though and schedules are going to get beefed up soon. Last year most thought Hannah Hidalgo was the clear favorite to win POY for the first 1/2 to 2/3 of the season and she didn’t take home a single POY award last year.
 
On Latson

https://www./features/inside-the-dawn-staley-effect-the-making-of-taniya-latsons-next-version/
 
.-.
There have been two weaknesses to Azzi’s AA and NPOY portfolio in the past: rebounding and passing. Those are the obvious places critics look when they want to find fault. Azzi’s passing seems to have improved a bit this season, and her rebounding maybe slightly better. But the really striking thing is her defense.

What I mainly see is how she shoulders the load game after game. She and Sarah do whatever it takes to win. Neither one of them is a stat stuffer. Either the relevant voters recognize this or they don’t.
 
There have been two weaknesses to Azzi’s AA and NPOY portfolio in the past: rebounding and passing. Those are the obvious places critics look when they want to find fault. Azzi’s passing seems to have improved a bit this season, and her rebounding maybe slightly better. But the really striking thing is her defense.

What I mainly see is how she shoulders the load game after game. She and Sarah do whatever it takes to win. Neither one of them is a stat stuffer. Either the relevant voters recognize this or they don’t.
Huh? Sarah is ABSOLUTELY a stat stuffer with her points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks. Azzi is upping her defense but she needs to cut down on her turnovers as she has made far too many silly passes which is uncharacteristic for her.
 
Huh? Sarah is ABSOLUTELY a stat stuffer with her points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks. Azzi is upping her defense but she needs to cut down on her turnovers as she has made far too many silly passes which is uncharacteristic for her.
You misunderstand me. I was using the term as a pejorative, which context ought to have made clear. As for the rest, you are repeating the points I made about Azzi’s passing.
 
You misunderstand me. I was using the term as a pejorative, which context ought to have made clear. As for the rest, you are repeating the points I made about Azzi’s passing.
I don't think is was just me who misunderstood you with whatever context you intended.
That said, from a guard position, the pre-season voting had 5 guards listed
  1. Hidalgo listed on 29 of 31 ballots All-American 1st team in 2024-25 and 2023-24
  2. Latson on 14/31 AA 2nd team in 2024-25, Honorable Mention 2022-23 & 2023-24
  3. Fudd 11/31
  4. Flau'jae Johns 4/31 AA 3rd team in 2024-25
  5. Blakes 3/31 AA-3rd team 2024-25
Other guards who received votes in last years end of season balloting were
  • Olivia Miles-TCU AA-2nd team 2024-25, 2nd team 2022-23 and HM 2021-22
  • Kiki Rice-UCLA AA HM in both 2024-25 and 2023-24
  • Malaysia Fulwiley-LSU HM 2024-25
  • Rori Harmon-Texas HM in 3 years 2021-22/2022-23/2024-25
  • Mikaylah Williams-LSU HM 2024-25
Guards off to great starts this year are
  • Jaloni Cambridge-tOSU
  • Britt Prince-Nebraska
  • Olivia Olson-Michigan
  • Tonie Morgan-Kentucky
What Azzi has going for her is name recognition, a top ranked team and elite shooting stats. In other words, she has a strong narrative. In following the voting intently these past few years, I do think the voters are using more analytics to assess the players to go along with the various narratives that coaches and media pundits tout. Azzi has ok Efficiency scores and good Win-Shares by comparison, but she needs to continue her elevation on passing, steals and defensive stopper to match her 51/49/100 shooting stats.

In my opinion, the top contenders when all is said and done will be
  • Hidalgo who is a lock for the 1st team unless she gets injured.
  • Miles
  • Mikayla Blakes
  • Fudd
  • Harmon
As TCU gains steam with an uncompetitive Big 12, Miles could garner the narrative and her stats will be great. Blakes will score but Vandy will falter in the tough SEC so I see her dropping. If Texas goes undefeated with Harmon and Booker, that could help Rori's case. Rori has name recognition and Vic pushing her leadership but I still think her shooting will hold her back (despite her strong start this year).

So long story short-the decision will come down to Azzi vs. Miles with the edge going to Miles as a point guard and more offensive stats (more rebounds, more assists) to help her plus the fact she's a true point guard for an AA team. Not the story this forum wants to hear but is what I believe. I will be rooting for Azzi but....
 
I don't think is was just me who misunderstood you with whatever context you intended.
That said, from a guard position, the pre-season voting had 5 guards listed
  1. Hidalgo listed on 29 of 31 ballots All-American 1st team in 2024-25 and 2023-24
  2. Latson on 14/31 AA 2nd team in 2024-25, Honorable Mention 2022-23 & 2023-24
  3. Fudd 11/31
  4. Flau'jae Johns 4/31 AA 3rd team in 2024-25
  5. Blakes 3/31 AA-3rd team 2024-25
Other guards who received votes in last years end of season balloting were
  • Olivia Miles-TCU AA-2nd team 2024-25, 2nd team 2022-23 and HM 2021-22
  • Kiki Rice-UCLA AA HM in both 2024-25 and 2023-24
  • Malaysia Fulwiley-LSU HM 2024-25
  • Rori Harmon-Texas HM in 3 years 2021-22/2022-23/2024-25
  • Mikaylah Williams-LSU HM 2024-25
Guards off to great starts this year are
  • Jaloni Cambridge-tOSU
  • Britt Prince-Nebraska
  • Olivia Olson-Michigan
  • Tonie Morgan-Kentucky
What Azzi has going for her is name recognition, a top ranked team and elite shooting stats. In other words, she has a strong narrative. In following the voting intently these past few years, I do think the voters are using more analytics to assess the players to go along with the various narratives that coaches and media pundits tout. Azzi has ok Efficiency scores and good Win-Shares by comparison, but she needs to continue her elevation on passing, steals and defensive stopper to match her 51/49/100 shooting stats.

In my opinion, the top contenders when all is said and done will be
  • Hidalgo who is a lock for the 1st team unless she gets injured.
  • Miles
  • Mikayla Blakes
  • Fudd
  • Harmon
As TCU gains steam with an uncompetitive Big 12, Miles could garner the narrative and her stats will be great. Blakes will score but Vandy will falter in the tough SEC so I see her dropping. If Texas goes undefeated with Harmon and Booker, that could help Rori's case. Rori has name recognition and Vic pushing her leadership but I still think her shooting will hold her back (despite her strong start this year).

So long story short-the decision will come down to Azzi vs. Miles with the edge going to Miles as a point guard and more offensive stats (more rebounds, more assists) to help her plus the fact she's a true point guard for an AA team. Not the story this forum wants to hear but is what I believe. I will be rooting for Azzi but....
Depending on Michigan’s finish Swords could move into the guard group. They need a big win and maintain a 2 seed.
 
.-.
I don't think is was just me who misunderstood you with whatever context you intended.
That said, from a guard position, the pre-season voting had 5 guards listed
  1. Hidalgo listed on 29 of 31 ballots All-American 1st team in 2024-25 and 2023-24
  2. Latson on 14/31 AA 2nd team in 2024-25, Honorable Mention 2022-23 & 2023-24
  3. Fudd 11/31
  4. Flau'jae Johns 4/31 AA 3rd team in 2024-25
  5. Blakes 3/31 AA-3rd team 2024-25
Other guards who received votes in last years end of season balloting were
  • Olivia Miles-TCU AA-2nd team 2024-25, 2nd team 2022-23 and HM 2021-22
  • Kiki Rice-UCLA AA HM in both 2024-25 and 2023-24
  • Malaysia Fulwiley-LSU HM 2024-25
  • Rori Harmon-Texas HM in 3 years 2021-22/2022-23/2024-25
  • Mikaylah Williams-LSU HM 2024-25
Guards off to great starts this year are
  • Jaloni Cambridge-tOSU
  • Britt Prince-Nebraska
  • Olivia Olson-Michigan
  • Tonie Morgan-Kentucky
What Azzi has going for her is name recognition, a top ranked team and elite shooting stats. In other words, she has a strong narrative. In following the voting intently these past few years, I do think the voters are using more analytics to assess the players to go along with the various narratives that coaches and media pundits tout. Azzi has ok Efficiency scores and good Win-Shares by comparison, but she needs to continue her elevation on passing, steals and defensive stopper to match her 51/49/100 shooting stats.

In my opinion, the top contenders when all is said and done will be
  • Hidalgo who is a lock for the 1st team unless she gets injured.
  • Miles
  • Mikayla Blakes
  • Fudd
  • Harmon
As TCU gains steam with an uncompetitive Big 12, Miles could garner the narrative and her stats will be great. Blakes will score but Vandy will falter in the tough SEC so I see her dropping. If Texas goes undefeated with Harmon and Booker, that could help Rori's case. Rori has name recognition and Vic pushing her leadership but I still think her shooting will hold her back (despite her strong start this year).

So long story short-the decision will come down to Azzi vs. Miles with the edge going to Miles as a point guard and more offensive stats (more rebounds, more assists) to help her plus the fact she's a true point guard for an AA team. Not the story this forum wants to hear but is what I believe. I will be rooting for Azzi but....
Why is Hidalgo a lock unless she gets injured?
 
IMHO both Azzi Fudd and Sarah Strong will be 1st team AP 5 member and WBCA 10 member All-American teams!
If things stay as they are at the present time they are the best on the undefeated #1 team in the nation!
This voting is for 2025-2026, not any previous year(s)!
If any "talking suit" takes previous injuries, averages, or performances from the past they are not doing what they are assigned to do!
Taking into effect what Crooks of Iowa State has done is record breaking. How she looks has no basis of fact in the voting!
The same can be said for Rori Harmon of TX she is the engine that makes TX go!
Mikayla Blakes is the engine for Vanderbilt's team!
Now if any team falters in the rest of the season that should take bearing on their votes.
 
IMHO both Azzi Fudd and Sarah Strong will be 1st team AP 5 member and WBCA 10 member All-American teams!
If things stay as they are at the present time they are the best on the undefeated #1 team in the nation!
This voting is for 2025-2026, not any previous year(s)!
If any "talking suit" takes previous injuries, averages, or performances from the past they are not doing what they are assigned to do!
Taking into effect what Crooks of Iowa State has done is record breaking. How she looks has no basis of fact in the voting!
The same can be said for Rori Harmon of TX she is the engine that makes TX go!
Mikayla Blakes is the engine for Vanderbilt's team!
Now if any team falters in the rest of the season that should take bearing on their votes.
Bingo! Concur. All the nonsense about "so-and-so won it last year" is eyebrow-raising at best.
 
I'm trying to summarize THEIR perceptions, not mine
Oh, you mean your perceptions of their perceptions. That's a bucket that doesn't carry water. However, if you would care to quote some of the statements that led you to perceive what the unnamed others are perceiving, then that would offer substance to the discussion.
 
Huh? Sarah is ABSOLUTELY a stat stuffer with her points, rebounds, assists, steals and blocks. Azzi is upping her defense but she needs to cut down on her turnovers as she has made far too many silly passes which is uncharacteristic for her.
Hmmm. I will raise your “Huh?” (for a tangential). Back when many were advocating Fudd be the PG over Muhl, they did so because of her skill, but not in recognition that her A/T ratio was less than 1.00 for much of her first season. As she has gained UConn experience she has cut down on the bad decisions and passes, not increased them, as the term “uncharacteristic” implies.
 
Given we are about a 3rd of the way through the season, I wanted to offer an opinion on the AA candidates using the Pre-season list, last year's first/second/third and honorable mention list and then the early news/media aspects touting candidates.

As a review, the list of Pre-season guards are:
Hannah Hidalgo ND
Ta'Niya Latson SC
Madison Booker Texas
the 4th and 5th persons were Sarah Strong and Lauren Betts

Just outside that group were Azzi Fudd and Flau'jae Johnson LSU

Also needing consideration will be Olivia Miles TCU, Kiki Rice UCLA, Mikayla Blakes Vanderbilt and Rory Harmon Texas.

That is 9 players.
Frankly, Madison will be a lock on the list due to the current Texas success and her past inclusion on this team
Hidalgo will have gaudy stats simply because her team needs her to so she will be a lock on the list (yes, I know and am aware of the BY angst with HH but the fact is the media and other pundits highly value her).
Latson is now on a highly public team and is viewed as their "star" so she will be a factor. In my opinion, she is NOT a lock for the 1st team.

  • Johnson from LSU is more sizzle than steak but if LSU has some key wins (like beating Texas/SC) and she is the key factor in those games, she will get publicity (and promotion from Mulkey).
  • Olivia Miles already has 2 AA mentions (2nd team and HM) and is leading a good TCU team (albeit in a weak conference) so as TCU makes noise, Miles will get media attention. In my view, she will be a 2nd team AA member and on the WBCA team.
  • Kiki Rice is leading player on a top Final Four contender, though I tend to think of other players on her own team more deserving. She is the point guard and a Senior so she will garner some attention. At this point, I view her more of an Honorable Mention candidate than serious contender.
  • Mikayla Blakes on Vanderbilt will put up gaudy numbers and if Vandy surprises anyone like breaking into the top 4 in the SEC this year, she will get credit. As the media touted her as a viable candidate to Sarah's FOY award last year, which irked me to NO END as her stats we not that close to Sarah's. I have no doubt that some of those very same pundits will do the same this year. But to me, she's a 2nd or 3rd team AP AA. probable member of the 10 person WBCA team.
  • Rory Harmon is looking really good right now and finally seems fully recovered from her knee injury and is shooting significantly better than she ever has and will Texas in the spot light, she will get attention. If she keeps it up, she's a 2nd or 3rd team AP AA.
My main point of this thread is:
  • Azzi Fudd has recognition, shooting stats to support that, team recognition and is showing defensive chops as well. Geno will be touting her contributions to whoever will listen. But as I have outlined it will be interesting to see how the AP 5 team is comprised and how the WBCA 10 team will look.
At the moment, I put Azzi, Sarah, Madison, Hannah and Latson on my 5 member team. I know that is 4 guards and Sarah so I am not sure if the other voters will feel that way. Betts, to me, is vastly overrated but is the best POST player in the game right now so....If she is put on the team, I think Latson is at risk although Azzi could also be overlooked.

The metrics favor Azzi over both Booker and Latson right now but as I have said, the pundits do not always use metrics but use narratives.

I am cautiously optimistic at this point given how strong Azzi has started the season. I just wish she would cut down on her turnovers and increase her assists to get to a greater than 2 to 1 ration (currently at 28/16).

I know this board considers it heresy that Azzi would not be on the team but I am trying to look as logically at it as I can (but yes, I too am biased!).
I think your list is fine but I would take Latson off and replace her with Crooks or Betts. I just don’t see Latson on that top line. Now she may break out over the rest of the season but right now? I don’t see it.
 
.-.
I think your list is fine but I would take Latson off and replace her with Crooks or Betts. I just don’t see Latson on that top line. Now she may break out over the rest of the season but right now? I don’t see it.
Latson has some really good stats to boost her resume. She has some of the most efficient stats of all high-scoring guards and is #9 in win shares. I think where she struggles is with the big time matchups, thus the debate. Once she has a big game against top 10 competition, I think she has a very strong argument for second team All-American at a minimum. I think that day is coming. I can see her getting better and more comfortable in the South Carolina system as each game passes.
 
This Azzi debate is very interseting and embodies many of my thoughts on her as well. However, her performance both in the final four last season and what she is doing this season has really opened my eyes. Azzi has improved her overall game with drives, pull ups, steals etc. not to even mention her quickness and strength (I saw a picture of her here on the Boneyard and thought, “she looks like she could run through a wall!” ) but her shooting…. She has really separated herself from, basically everyone with her shooting! Yes, there are a few others who shoot very high percentages but none have the overall package that Azzi has.

I have consistently said that Dallas would be crazy not to take 1. Fam or 2. Betts as really good bigs are so hard to find. However, as the season goes on and I see Azzi continue to shoot 50%+ from three, I must admit, my formerly firm conviction is softening fast. For one thing, her shot is not only as close to perfect as you can get but her release is also elitely (Is that a word?) fast! I kept waiting for that percentage to come back down to mere mortal status but it didn’t! If this is her normal, then she is a weapon beyond compare. She can win a game in the space of a few minutes! That is hard to pass up if you are a coach or GM.
 
There is no waay Olivia Miles and Blakes should be sniffing anything near 1st team top 5 as of right now. Olivia Miles teams have played against competietion SOS ranked 227. That's embarrassing for a team thought to be top level if we want to speak of being top 5 in the country individually. Playing a junuior varrsity schedule shouldn't elevate you to 1st 5. Simiilar to Blakes. Her team's SOS is 199.
 
Last edited:
There is no waay Olivia Miles and Blakes should be sniffing anything near 1st team top 5 as of right now. Olivia Miles teams have played against competietion SOS ranked 227. That's embarrassing for a team thought to be top level if we want to speak of being top 5 in the country individually. Playing a junuior varrsity schedule shouldn't elevate you to 1st 5. Simiilar to Blakes. Her team's SOS is 199.
So what is the SOS cutoff level? Top 20 in SOS?

When is that determined? Now- at the end of the pre-conference period? Flaujae? At the end of the conference seasons? Conference tournaments? End of the elite 8s?

I guess I’m just saying it’s a bit early to eliminate anybody based upon level of competition- though I concede that it will be a relevant consideration at the proper time,
 
I guess I’m just saying it’s a bit early to eliminate anybody based upon level of competition- though I concede that it will be a relevant consideration at the proper time,
Exactly. It’s also a bit early to think any forecasts have any real significance, whether eliminating or including. Before mid-February this is little more than idle speculation.
 
So what is the SOS cutoff level? Top 20 in SOS?

When is that determined? Now- at the end of the pre-conference period? Flaujae? At the end of the conference seasons? Conference tournaments? End of the elite 8s?

I guess I’m just saying it’s a bit early to eliminate anybody based upon level of competition- though I concede that it will be a relevant consideration at the proper time,
It certianly isn't 227 or 199. We're not in a court of law here.
Anyhow, my post said "as of right now."
Shouldn't it be "as of right now?"
 
.-.
It certianly isn't 227 or 199. We're not in a court of law here.
Anyhow, my post said "as of right now."
Shouldn't it be "as of right now?"
Didn’t I highlight that in acknowledgment of your qualifier. I wasn't arguing with your point - just clarifying
 
Didn’t I highlight that in acknowledgment of your qualifier. I wasn't arguing with your point - just clarifying
I didn't understand. I took it for that you replied to me while you asked me a question.

Okay. All set.
 
Latson’s ankle may move her down the list . Hope it’s minor and limited to a couple of weeks off. But, if not she could miss the Texas game or cause a limited number of minutes she can get against a top notch competitor
 
I think here is how I'd categorize the guards early on:

Top candidates for 1st team:
-Olivia Miles, TCU, has the total package for a 1st Team AA ballot right now. Big 12 looks weak though so if TCU doesn't win I could see her dropping to 2nd team.

-Hannah Hidalgo, Notre Dame, has great stats but potentially poor team success. If she keeps up productivity and ND is top 20 all year I can't see her missing 1st team though

-Mikayla Blakes, Vanderbilt, strong contender at this point, great numbers but will potentially have a tougher time keeping up efficiency in SEC play as defenses focus closely on her.

Just outside looking in:
-Azzi Fudd, UCONN, has great efficiency but doesn't fill up full stat sheet as well as others. Likely will get fewer minutes in weak conference too.

-Taliah Scott, Baylor, she's off to an incredible start but lacks name recognition and national merit

Has work to do:
-For LSU, they'll likely need one of Flau'jae/Fulwiley/Williams to emerge as the go to player. Likely Flau'jae, but a potentially balanced offense hinders any one player from standing out. SEC play will reveal a lot about the team structure and potential.

-Olivia Olson, Michigan, stats aren't full there for 1st Team but if Michigan wins the B1G or comes close and she keeps up her play, I think she has a shot.

-Jazzy Davidson, USC, she's a good darkhorse pick right now as she's starting to find her groove and is an excellent 2 way player. Clear standout on USC and will get exposure in the B1G. Needs to improve efficiency.

Likely not a contender:
-Rori Harmon, Texas, is probably the best 2 way PG in the country but she just doesn't score enough. Definitely a championship level PG though.

-TaNiya Latson, South Carolina, I'm not seeing her as a true candidate. In marquee games she hasn't been a go to offensive player for South Carolina. All of her big games are against bad teams so far.

-Talaysia Cooper, Tennessee, pretty solid statline but Tennessee is underperforming so far

-Kiki Rice/Gianna Kneepkens, UCLA, both have nice numbers but not at 1st Team level IMO.

-Aaliyah Chavez, Oklahoma has put up big games, needs to clean up efficiency though and likely gets outshined by teammate Beers for awards

-Jaloni Cambridge, Ohio State, really nice numbers, team needs to be top 10-15 to have a shot though

-Britt Prince, Nebraska, she has the best stats in the country among guards but schedule is weak and likely to come down big time against Big 10 competitions

-Jordan Lee, Texas, excellent 2 way player but isn't going to have stats to merit 1st or 2nd team honors.

-Liv McGill, Florida, crazy stats but Florida likely isn't good enough to garner national attention

-Shay Ciezki, Indiana, same scenario as Live McGill


Also, I'd categorize Madison Booker of Texas as more of a SF, though if we're considering her a guard she's in the top candidates section.
I'm sorry, but what else does Azzi have to do? Oh wait, if she didn't have UCONN on the front of her jersey, you'd be singing her praises. Your anti UCONN bias year in and year out is so tired and forced.
 
I'm sorry, but what else does Azzi have to do? Oh wait, if she didn't have UCONN on the front of her jersey, you'd be singing her praises. Your anti UCONN bias year in and year out is so tired and forced.
Azzi has played herself into the favorite for the #1 pick and if UConn ends up the #1 overall seed (highly likely) and/or undefeated, 99% chance she’ll make first-team, but for now, I don’t see anti-UConn bias for favoring the other three guards over her:

Miles: 18.9 ppg / 7.2 reb / 7.6 assists
Hidalgo: 25.5 ppg / 6.3 reb / 5.0 assists
Blakes: 23.9 ppg / 4.0 reb / 3.8 assists
Fudd: 18.1 ppg / 2.8 reb / 2.8 assists

AA discussions always favor individual statistics early in the season. UConn has played a very good SOS but by March it’ll have balanced out with the others based on conference strength.
 
Azzi has played herself into the favorite for the #1 pick and if UConn ends up the #1 overall seed (highly likely) and/or undefeated, 99% chance she’ll make first-team, but for now, I don’t see anti-UConn bias for favoring the other three guards over her:

Miles: 18.9 ppg / 7.2 reb / 7.6 assists
Hidalgo: 25.5 ppg / 6.3 reb / 5.0 assists
Blakes: 23.9 ppg / 4.0 reb / 3.8 assists
Fudd: 18.1 ppg / 2.8 reb / 2.8 assists

AA discussions always favor individual statistics early in the season. UConn has played a very good SOS but by March it’ll have balanced out with the others based on conference strength.
Thanks for putting the numbers together. I think Azzi should be an AA over all the guards on that list. Not saying the other 3 shouldn't be All-Americans. Azzi has played a tough OOC and has shown up in big games. She's crazy efficient, and her defense has improved a ton. Miles and Blakes haven't played against elite competition yet. Hannah has had some tough games against the better teams on her schedule.

Azzi should be an AA
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,149
Messages
4,554,900
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom