- Joined
- Sep 9, 2011
- Messages
- 2,935
- Reaction Score
- 5,476
How can you compare Tina Charles at 6'3" to Griner who has such a distinct physical advantage over 99.9% of the women who have ever played basketball at any level. Giving up something like 5 inches is a massive amount. Another thing is that Griner had a chance to work with Geno over the summer and it was noted by her that his coaching had a big effect on her. To attribute all of her growth strictly to her coach or their staff is silly. Beyond that, she is like almost any person on the planet and that her body is maturing. Even a typical none athlete is physically stronger and has more dexterity in the years just past their being teenagers. Some of the stats aren't necessarily noteworthy. What was Tamika Williams field goal percentage over her career. Wasn't it something like 70% for her ENTIRE CAREER?????????????? I concede that she's gotten better but part of that is a natural maturation.As far as the comparison to Tina Charles, who was an phenomenal player, she did not average double digit rebounding in a single UCONN season.
Griner finished the season with 206 blocks and averaged 2.05 fouls per game. She is the most dominant defensive force ever seen and only averaged 2 fouls a game! That is an incredible stat.
23.2 ppg
9.5 rpg
5.15 bpg
60.9% fg
80% ft
50% from three point range (1 of 2...LOL)
Now give the woman her due and quit nitpicking. Why is it so hard for some to admit what a great player she is? And if her improvements continue as they have I can only imagine what there stats will look like next year.


