- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 7,637
- Reaction Score
- 26,210
Everyone was p.o.d because UCONN didn't get the ACC invite so yes, remaining in what became the AAC was a very bitter pill. No one was happy about it. But had UCONN won, fans would have been a lot more optimistic about playing the games.
2013 Standings
Overall Conference Points Per Game SRS Polls School W L Pct W L Pct Off Def SRS SOS AP Pre AP High AP Rank Notes UCF 12 1 .923 8 0 1.000 34.6 21.3 8.42 -2.96 10 10 Louisville 12 1 .923 7 1 .875 35.2 12.2 9.99 -5.85 9 7 15 Cincinnati 9 4 .692 6 2 .750 32.1 21.0 0.41 -6.90 Houston 8 5 .615 5 3 .625 33.2 21.8 4.93 -1.92 SMU 5 7 .417 4 4 .500 26.8 33.3 -7.44 -2.44 Rutgers 6 7 .462 3 5 .375 26.5 29.8 -5.68 -3.37 Connecticut 3 9 .250 3 5 .375 20.6 30.3 -11.97 -2.97 South Florida 2 10 .167 2 6 .250 13.8 28.6 -13.56 -0.47 Memphis 3 9 .250 1 7 .125 19.5 24.6 -7.41 -2.66 Temple 2 10 .167 1 7 .125 24.9 29.8 -10
Correct, Cincy's fanbase didn't dwindle in the AAC, it probably improved. UCF used the AAC to catapult themselves into the P5. Memphis and Houston reignited their football fortunes in the AAC. Blaming AAC conference affiliation for UCONN football's decline is classic boneyard BS. PP, Debacle and the fools who hired them poisoned the UCONN fanbase far more than the AAC did.
The AAC provided outstanding football competition, and our football coaches responded by assuming the fetal position and stealing a boatload of money in the process.
Last edited: