So if Brimiah and Hamilton leave and Gibbs and Miller are gone after this year how do you think the team will be next year? Top 20?
I really am not trolling. I am trying to have a honest debate on where we rank compared to the rest of the country. But people act immature and make it personal.
So if Brimiah and Hamilton leave and Gibbs and Miller are gone after this year how do you think the team will be next year? Top 20?
IF Diallo reclassifies to 2016 we will have the #1 recruiting class in the country and a starting 5 which includes at least two 5 star recruits and three highly rated 4 star recruits.So if Brimiah and Hamilton leave and Gibbs and Miller are gone after this year how do you think the team will be next year? Top 20?
And my initial response was this guy is 6-11 200lbs. No way he will help us unless he gets stronger and is coming off a ACL. We see gonna need impact Freshman with us most likely losing 4 starters after this year.
And my initial response was this guy is 6-11 200lbs. No way he will help us unless he gets stronger and is coming off a ACL. We see gonna need impact Freshman with us most likely losing 4 starters after this year.
Ok tough guy just for you.Stop posting.
You're too dumb and too determined to show it off.
Just go away.
They lost their 2 best players to the NBA draft so I don't think you can use that they were 22-11 last year in your argument about their potential for this coming season. Better to just look at their current roster to make that determination.They were 22-11 last year and bring in the best player in the country so yes I feel they are better.
They were 22-11 last year and bring in the best player in the country so yes I feel they are better.
Why stop there... Here's hoping Adams leaves too as that means we just won NC#5.So if Brimiah and Hamilton leave and Gibbs and Miller are gone after this year how do you think the team will be next year? Top 20?
You could have had a rational debate with several posters regarding the team. But you presented things in a manner that was going to create an emotional reaction and not in a good way. Sticking with the intellectual part of your debate is not the problem. Observe mau's and hoopers posts. They aren't flaming on you. There are quite a few responses in this thread that lack maturity. I'll agree with you about that. But you are a lightening rod for those responses and that's because, imo, you do not see how you present yourself to the public. A big shift isn't required in order to create a rational and stimulating debate.I really am not trolling. I am trying to have a honest debate on where we rank compared to the rest of the country. But people act immature and make it personal.
Gblow8690 said:Gibbs will help. Not sold on a Ivy League player to be a major contributor. Sorry
Well, there's your ultimate undoing. The fact that all you know about Miller is that he comes from teh Ivy League is very telling. Or maybe you missed the earlier post ranking all college defensive players. I'll give you a hint where Miller came in... It's a very, very small number.Gibbs will help. Not sold on a Ivy League player to be a major contributor. Sorry
Brimah plays as hard as anyone in the country but still can't rebound or have any offensive moves and gets in foul trouble every game.
I appreciate your response. And all I wanted to do was debate what we have and what we need to stay relevant going forward. Being in the AAC leaves very little wiggle room to fall from. We could become Umass very quickly if we don't watch it.You could have had a rational debate with several posters regarding the team. But you presented things in a manner that was going to create an emotional reaction and not in a good way. Sticking with the intellectual part of your debate is not the problem. Observe mau's and hoopers posts. They aren't flaming on you. There are quite a few responses in this thread that lack maturity. I'll agree with you about that. But you are a lightening rod for those responses and that's because, imo, you do not see how you present yourself to the public. A big shift isn't required in order to create a rational and stimulating debate.
I appreciate your response. And all I wanted to do was debate what we have and what we need to stay relevant going forward. Being in the AAC leaves very little wiggle room to fall from. We could become Umass very quickly if we don't watch it.
UMASS!? The status of UCONN basketball probably makes the list of concerns for the governor of CT. The status of UMASS basketball isn't even on the radar in MA. That fact and about 1000 others is why UCONN is where it is and why UMASS is where it is. I'm having a hard time believing you are a UCONN fan.I appreciate your response. And all I wanted to do was debate what we have and what we need to stay relevant going forward. Being in the AAC leaves very little wiggle room to fall from. We could become Umass very quickly if we don't watch it.
Your entire approach to this argument, as baseless as it is, has been off.I appreciate your response. And all I wanted to do was debate what we have and what we need to stay relevant going forward. Being in the AAC leaves very little wiggle room to fall from. We could become Umass very quickly if we don't watch it.
We could become Umass very quickly if we don't watch it.