Is there enough reason to get out of paying the guarantees?
This is the big question. Is this a cancellation being forced by an act of god, or is this conference policy. Frankly if they ended up playing conference games in the fall.. I would think that would be enough to say if it was safe enough for this game, why wasn't it for the non-conference game and start to make these schools have to pay out the guarantees.. which at least would help to keep from the G5 schools whole.
Some thoughts from others...
Buying a few more weeks...
What happens to the student athletes who won’t play due to the higher risk Profile? Do they lose their scholarship? It’s a lot of pressure on young people and grossly unfair.
Yeah there is no other way to do this. Playing is an option... has to be.I’ve seen multiple conferences reference (B1G/PAC12 for recent examples) that student-athletes will maintain their scholarships if they decide not to compete in the fall.
(Here is the PAC12 statement: “Pac-12 student-athletes who choose not to participate in intercollegiate athletics during the coming academic year because of safety concerns about COVID-19 will continue to have their scholarships honored by their university and will remain in good standing with their team.”)