You must be a defense lawyer.
The thing you're calling "spin" is not "spin." It's very reasonable inference.
Regarding why he wasn't indicted - he wasn't indicted because he died. If he was alive right now, there's a very, very good chance there would be charges pending against him.
You're not "nitpicking" - you're struggling mightily (and failing) to find reasonable doubt that Paterno effectively was a blocking back for Sandusky running straight up the middle into child rape red zones.
I'm for giving the program the death penalty, and I believe Paterno tried to cover this up. That being said, I don't think you've read the Freeh report. Freeh did not release the handwritten note by Schultz and Spanier that showed the Pres and Veep had mapped out the ultimate cowardly strategy they took long before the Curley/Paterno meeting.
Here is how it went:
1. Sandusky rapes the kid
2. McQueary talks to doctor (mandatory reporter) that night
3. Paterno talks to McQueary next morning
4. Paterno talks to Curley/Schultz the next day
5. Curley/Schultz talk to Spanier the next day, the lawyers are brought in to oversee strategy, the afternoon of 2/12/01, Schultz and Spanier write down the strategy which was to go to Sandusky first and "unless he confesses" to go to authorities.
6. Curley doesn't speak to Sandusky for three weeks.
7. No one knows what happened between the Schultz/Spanier memo and the Curley/Paterno meeting. We can speculate they spoke to McQueary and may have changed tactics after talking to him, and then perhaps Paterno changed Curley's mind, but the President, VEEP and lawyers were all predisposed to sweeping it under the rug. TRhis much is evidenced in the Freeh report.
Furthermore, this isn't the first time these people swept child molestation under the rug. They did it in the case of a professor as well, so... don't be too easy on the admins.
I'm betting that Paterno, Spanier and the lawyers designed the cover-up a few days after the rape.