Paige warming to Geno already | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Paige warming to Geno already

I would say she will round out Mt. Rushmore nicely. Dee, Maya, Stewie and Paige. IMHO when she's finished her 4 years at UCONN, there really won't be any disagreement as to who the all time top 4 greats are. We will need to expand Mt. Rushmore to 5 or 6!! :D
I'd take Bird over Paige any day.
 
I agree. I wouldn't waste any minutes for an impact player on the bench. Different teams and coaches but Ionescu never sat much as a freshman. This level of talent doesn't come around that often to not use it.

When I read this I thought of Horston at Tenn and Brunelle at N Dame. Both were heavily used early last season and looked great but they both got very worn down later in the season. Bueckers benefits from a shorter season but the pounding of college ball takes a lot out of freshmen.
 
.-.
I thought it was just me.

Did not notice. Blinded by how good Geno looks. Love the turtleneck / sweatshirt combination and clean shaven. :D:D
 
Did not notice. Blinded by how good Geno looks. Love the turtleneck / sweatshirt combination and clean shaven. :D:D
I'm really not relating to all these sweatshirt/sweater/jacket pics, since I live in Phoenix and it's still 100 here. But, anyway, I think Geno's "turtleneck" is a mask pulled down around his neck, no?
 
I would say she will round out Mt. Rushmore nicely. Dee, Maya, Stewie and Paige. IMHO when she's finished her 4 years at UCONN, there really won't be any disagreement as to who the all time top 4 greats are. We will need to expand Mt. Rushmore to 5 or 6!! :D

The nice thing about that is we know it's coming, and get to watch it unfold and enjoy it game by game for the next 4 years. I agree on expanding UConn's Mount Rushmore. Four players are not enough. There's nothing/no one to say we can't do it. It's OUR Mount Rushmore. We can select as many slots or places on it we want to.

The original Mount only has 4 because the sculptor, Gutzon Borglum wanted that way. We want more. How about 10? :) A lot of deserving former UConn greats would be left out with only 4 spaces available, and 3 of them already taken. Your 3 not mine.
 
Last edited:
The nice thing about that is we know it's coming, and get to watch it unfold and enjoy it game by game for the next 4 years. I agree on expanding UConn's Mount Rushmore. Four players are not enough. There's nothing/no one to say we can't do it. It's OUR Mount Rushmore. We can select as many slots or places on it we want to. How about 10? :)

If you want more than four busts on it, I suggest you call the mountain something other than Rushmore.:rolleyes:
 
.-.
I'm really not relating to all these sweatshirt/sweater/jacket pics, since I live in Phoenix and it's still 100 here. But, anyway, I think Geno's "turtleneck" is a mask pulled down around his neck, no?
Even better
 
If you want more than four busts on it, I suggest you call the mountain something other than Rushmore.:rolleyes:

If "Mount Rushmore" won't work, then we can ask the Boneyard to get on it, and come up with a definitive name for it by the end of the season. :cool:
 
Last edited:
The nice thing about that is we know it's coming, and get to watch it
The original Mount only has 4 because the sculptor, Gutzon Borglum wanted that way. We want more. How about 10? :) A lot of deserving former UConn greats would be left out with only 4 spaces available, and 3 of them already taken. Your 3 not mine.
I think that's called the Wall of Honor. To me the fun/challenge of deciding who gets to be on Mt. Rushmore is the exclusivity & requirement to force rank them. For instance, if Azzi comes here and ends up being the next "GOAT", then you have ONE space for Paige or Azzi (assuming we think they're better than Sue and Rebecca). If it's both Paige AND Azzi, then one of them has to be better than DT, Maya or Stewie and one of those has to go.

OTOH the Wall of Honor will accommodate as many AA's as we have players who can earn AA. Nowadays it seems like everybody is called the GOAT so we have more than one GOAT. What?? By definition there can only be one GOAT. And by definition you can't really have a "generational" player every year like we seem to have now. And, similarly, by definition (IMO) there can only be 4 heads on Mt. Rushmore.
 
I agree. I wouldn't waste any minutes for an impact player on the bench. Different teams and coaches but Ionescu never sat much as a freshman. This level of talent doesn't come around that often to not use it.
On the other hand dumping high expectations on a 18-year-old can be counterproductive. It’s better to ease her in and increase her minutes and responsibilities over time.
 
On the other hand dumping high expectations on a 18-year-old can be counterproductive. It’s better to ease her in and increase her minutes and responsibilities over time.
Some can handle it and some can’t. Ionescu didn’t have any problem averaging 31 minutes a game as a freshman and 38 in the post season. And IMO, Bueckers is every bit as good as Ionescu coming out of HS. So I’d take my chances with her, I believe she has what it takes between the ears.
 
.-.
Some can handle it and some can’t. Ionescu didn’t have any problem averaging 31 minutes a game as a freshman and 38 in the post season. And IMO, Bueckers is every bit as good as Ionescu coming out of HS. So I’d take my chances with her, I believe she has what it takes between the ears.
How many natties did Sabrina win again?
 
When I read this I thought of Horston at Tenn and Brunelle at N Dame. Both were heavily used early last season and looked great but they both got very worn down later in the season. Bueckers benefits from a shorter season but the pounding of college ball takes a lot out of freshmen.
At no time did Brunelle and Horston look great last season. Good, yes, but not great. Also, I believe Edwards will be one of the players UConn fans will be talking about being on the Wall of Honor and maybe have a career as productive as Bueckers' is predicted to be.
 
On the other hand dumping high expectations on a 18-year-old can be counterproductive. It’s better to ease her in and increase her minutes and responsibilities over time.

Why?

How counter-productive was it for South Carolina last year?

I'm neutral on who starts. But in regards to minutes- sure "it can be counter-productive" but it can be "counter-productive" if you lose in an early big season game if you didn't play her as much and she was really good or as a coach you become too cautious with potential superstars. Then while you see for example South Carolina's young players tearing it up - then eventually you open up the door for other coaches/teams to get that foot in the door for the next "Stewart/Maya/DT/Bird."

Anyhow I think no way no way any comparison can be done vs the great amazing supreme Sue Bird. I'm with ya. But on the flip side not all freshmen should be treated with kid gloves early. I would think it being more "stubborn" than anything if the rule you don't budge from is "she is a frosh and my rule is no more than 20 minutes."

If she is really really really good - play her.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't strike me as someone who will be coming off the bench.
IDK, even MM didn't start until the 8th game of her freshman season and we know the hype she had coming in pre-social media! That's even after her first game against Stony Brook where we all saw the greatness that was to come!!
 
Last edited:
.-.
How many natties did Sabrina win again?
What's your point? Ionescu was the 1st pick in the WNBA draft. My point is that playing a lot as a freshman didn't bother her development as a top talent at all. Has nothing to do with NCs. Those are a team accomplishment.
 
IDK, even MM didn't start until the 8th game of her freshman season and we know the hype she had coming in pre-social media! That's even after her first game against Stony Brook where we all saw the greatness that was to come!!


Point taken, but I just think Bueckers is different. Until I see otherwise, I firmly believe she's ready now.
 
Just thought I would add the Geno Interview on this thread since the other shorter clips do not
have the last 20 seconds when Geno attains the same level of Rapture as he did with his "We got D and you dont"




" Tell Paige I said hi"

" Tell her people to call my people"


:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
Can you guess who Geno was just talking about??

1602844343565.png
 
What's your point? Ionescu was the 1st pick in the WNBA draft. My point is that playing a lot as a freshman didn't bother her development as a top talent at all. Has nothing to do with NCs. Those are a team accomplishment.
My point is that Geno has been doing this a lot of years and fairly successfully. Whatever he thinks is appropriate for Paige is fine by me. Traditionally though, Geno has eased people into the lineup when he’s had the option to do so. That has less to do with whether they can “handle it“ and more to do with what he views is the optimal way to bring them to their potential. The fact that Graves took a different approach with Sabrina is vaguely interesting, but not particularly determinative.
 
My point is that Geno has been doing this a lot of years and fairly successfully. Whatever he thinks is appropriate for Paige is fine by me. Traditionally though, Geno has eased people into the lineup when he’s had the option to do so. That has less to do with whether they can “handle it“ and more to do with what he views is the optimal way to bring them to their potential. The fact that Graves took a different approach with Sabrina is vaguely interesting, but not particularly determinative.

It has been said very often that Geno's greatest gift is his insight into his players and his ability to push the right buttons to get them, to reach their best. The evidence is very clear that Geno is completely in tune with Paige and visa versa and will be played exactly as she should be.

It also appears that we are blessed with a great supporting cast of aggressive, confident, ambitious, like minded players completely fixated on winning and competing and we are just entering the next great era of UConn ball played in that unique unselfish team first style that we all love.

Of course, there is room for 'ahem' 'ahem' .
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,962
Messages
4,546,895
Members
10,428
Latest member
CarloPFF


Top Bottom