Our three point shooting | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Our three point shooting

superjohn said:
UConn was 3 for 17 last night and 6 for 39 for three against Northwestern and Illinois combined. It shows the dominance of Clingan and just how truly great this team is. What happens when we start knocking down threes?
Expand ...
Let’s just hope we do. The trend is not our friend.
 
UCTitleTown said:
Just to play devil's advocate, maybe we're actually not a good three point shooting team?
Expand ...
After 38 games this season and 904 attempts, a very big sample size, the team is a tick under 36%. That's good for 77th in D1. So while not elite, that's not terrible either. They've been off during the NCAA Tournament. But you know what they say about water finding its level? So it's coming. At least that's my hope.

www.ncaa.com

NCAA College Men's Basketball DI current team Stats | NCAA.com

Discover the current NCAA Division I Men's Basketball leaders in every stats category, as well as historic leaders.
www.ncaa.com www.ncaa.com
 
Newton and Karaban have always been streaky shooters, and they seem to make the clutch ones when the team needs them, and we certainly didn’t need them in this game. This whole thread is just ridiculous. The team sets a record for dominating the ncaa tournament and you are freaking out about the one statistic that wasn’t perfect out of of 100s of stats.

YES UConn has to play well to win a title, but they have been playing well all year. YES they could have 1 bad game and lose in a single elimination tournament. But this is perhaps the greatest UConn team ever, and they are in the final four two years in a row. Stop freaking out and enjoy the ride.
 
.-.
To add to that at the start of the San Diego State game San Diego St was on fire, on offense, and we did not some three pointers and Karaban made 2 huge ones that were nothing but net, one of them fro, like 30 feet.
 
ThabeetDown said:
Balls are overinflated at many neutral sites. Causes 3s to go long.
Expand ...
I just crunched the numbers to see if there's any truth to this. It doesn't look like it, unless you're suggesting there are some geographical anomalies.

I looked at all of the 64 teams (didn't bother with the first four) and what they shot cumulatively for the season from deep versus what they shot during March Madness.

Overall, the teams shot a collective 35.36% from three during the season (exclusive of MM), and 34.43% during March Madness. It's been awhile since I took stats but I assume increased level of competition has something to do with the marginally lower percentage.

I also looked at it team by team. We're shooting 8.6% below our 3P average (28.1% vs 36.7%) and have the highest deviation from the mean of any team that made it to the Elite 8. The next closest is Duke, that shot it 5.3% below their 3P average (33.3% vs 38.6%).

Alabama, of teams that made the E8, is at the other end of the spectrum. They're shooting 41.4% in the tournament, which is 4.9% better than their 36.5% season average.
 
HooperScooper said:
After 38 games this season and 904 attempts, a very big sample size, the team is a tick under 36%. That's good for 77th in D1. So while not elite, that's not terrible either. They've been off during the NCAA Tournament. But you know what they say about water finding its level? So it's coming. At least that's my hope.

www.ncaa.com

NCAA College Men's Basketball DI current team Stats | NCAA.com

Discover the current NCAA Division I Men's Basketball leaders in every stats category, as well as historic leaders.
www.ncaa.com www.ncaa.com
Expand ...
While we’re not bad at 3s I don’t think we rely on them to win games. Which is a great thing.

Whether we shoot 40% or 10% doesn’t matter much for us these days.
 
Mike Honcho said:
I just crunched the numbers to see if there's any truth to this. It doesn't look like it, unless you're suggesting there are some geographical anomalies.

I looked at all of the 64 teams (didn't bother with the first four) and what they shot cumulatively for the season from deep versus what they shot during March Madness.

Overall, the teams shot a collective 35.36% from three during the season (exclusive of MM), and 34.43% during March Madness. It's been awhile since I took stats but I assume increased level of competition has something to do with the marginally lower percentage.

I also looked at it team by team. We're shooting 8.6% below our 3P average (28.1% vs 36.7%) and have the highest deviation from the mean of any team that made it to the Elite 8. The next closest is Duke, that shot it 5.3% below their 3P average (33.3% vs 38.6%).

Alabama, of teams that made the E8, is at the other end of the spectrum. They're shooting 41.4% in the tournament, which is 4.9% better than their 36.5% season average.
Expand ...
I think the point was each site had pumped them differently but I have no clue if that’s true.
 
When you're destroying teams the way we've been destroying teams, I just don't see any weakness

We're destroying teams, what more can we do?
 
willie99 said:
When you're destroying teams the way we've been destroying teams, I just don't see any weakness

We're destroying teams, what more can we do?
Expand ...

Then what happened vs Creighton? What happens if we go 3/20 and Bama shoots 15/30? Our defense is awesome but sometimes teams get really hot from deep. (And what happens if DC and/or SC pick up 2 early fouls?) If we’re not making 3s, we need transition hoops, and for that we need long rebounds. Fewer Bama misses, fewer transition hoops.

I’m not saying that’s likely but 3-point shooting is, in fact, a weakness if we continue shooting this way. 28% is bad.
 
.-.
Mike Honcho said:
I just crunched the numbers to see if there's any truth to this. It doesn't look like it, unless you're suggesting there are some geographical anomalies.

I looked at all of the 64 teams (didn't bother with the first four) and what they shot cumulatively for the season from deep versus what they shot during March Madness.

Overall, the teams shot a collective 35.36% from three during the season (exclusive of MM), and 34.43% during March Madness. It's been awhile since I took stats but I assume increased level of competition has something to do with the marginally lower percentage.

I also looked at it team by team. We're shooting 8.6% below our 3P average (28.1% vs 36.7%) and have the highest deviation from the mean of any team that made it to the Elite 8. The next closest is Duke, that shot it 5.3% below their 3P average (33.3% vs 38.6%).

Alabama, of teams that made the E8, is at the other end of the spectrum. They're shooting 41.4% in the tournament, which is 4.9% better than their 36.5% season average.
Expand ...
Curious if the data suggests a bigger deviation at particular sights than others, or is it pretty much same across the board
 
nomar said:
Then what happened vs Creighton? What happens if we go 3/20 and Bama shoots 15/30? Our defense is awesome but sometimes teams get really hot from deep. (And what happens if DC and/or SC pick up 2 early fouls?) If we’re not making 3s, we need transition hoops, and for that we need long rebounds. Fewer Bama misses, fewer transition hoops.

I’m not saying that’s likely but 3-point shooting is, in fact, a weakness if we continue shooting this way. 28% is bad.
Expand ...


Good God, stop

You have the best team in the country. Doesn't mean they're going to win every game.

If you can find a problem with this team, that's 1000% on you.
 
willie99 said:
Good God, stop

You have the best team in the country. Doesn't mean they're going to win every game.

If you can find a problem with this team, that's 1000% on you.
Expand ...

Good God, read.

It’s not a problem. It’s not a likely problem. It’s a potential problem. Pretty obvious from what I wrote.
 
OK, you lost me at "what happened vs Creighton"

We're taking what they give us, because we can. And with AZ gone, we don't have to worry about a home court advantage for anyone
 
ThabeetDown said:
Balls are overinflated at many neutral sites. Causes 3s to go long.
Expand ...
Odd comment. Perhaps the strange neutral courts and backgrounds have more to do with the many misses along with the intense defense being played by the desperate one and done games. Seems like most players are jacked up and out of sync.
 
.-.
Luckily we have Guards who are good rebounders. We've also been known to focus on guarding the 3-point shot against good shooting teams. Having Clingan under the basket also makes it easier to play up on shooters. Bama likes to run and take early shots from the perimeter, a combo that could work in to our advantage.
 
.-.
I predict we get back on track as a collective group from 3 next week... We do that, we're really hard to beat... I don't care who's left
 
ktuck911 said:
I predict we get back on track as a collective group from 3 next week... We do that, we're really hard to beat... I don't care who's left
Expand ...
Hopefully, now that the issue with the basketballs is being publicized, someone will make sure the F4 balls are inflated correctly.
If not, both sides will probably shoot poorly.
 
ibleedhuskyblue said:
yup
Expand ...
They're different teams, but Illinois played them close twice, once without Shannon.

Purdue is a step above Illinois. But, now that we have our full team playing, Purdue is closer to Illinois than they are to us. Doesn't mean we can't lose, but we're reasonably the favorites.
 
Alabama had the same brand balls and shot good right? UConn defense is at a level that is unworldly and Hurley and his father are on the same page with this. One article said that Bob Sr. and wife was going to Disney World until Friday because his wife got the dates mixed up with Easter being so early but, he will phone for a very “long conversation” midweek before going out to Phoenix.
Luke and Kimani have the offensive and defensive schemes already worked out and I’m sure they have included both Purdue and NC State. Our staff and team are hyper focused and the players who celebrated last year have made it clear that if they too want to enjoy that there are no shortcuts.
Some of this is in the hands of the refs but effort wise we do not have to worry, then we’ll see.
 
JMick said:
I don't understand why leagues change balls as frequently as they do. It seems like the only sport that doesn't screw with the ball is the NFL
Expand ...
Hmmm.... Inflategate and the Patriots?
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,256
Messages
4,560,139
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom