- Joined
- Mar 20, 2018
- Messages
- 3,297
- Reaction Score
- 10,927
Just to play devil's advocate, maybe we're actually not a good three point shooting team?
NopeIllinios is as good as Purdue. At least close. Marquette too.
Balls are overinflated at many neutral sites. Causes 3s to go long.
Even after 4 games of bad shooting from 3, we're still shooting 36% as a team. That's...that's pretty darn good from 3. It's 78th in the country.Just to play devil's advocate, maybe we're actually not a good three point shooting team?
Let’s just hope we do. The trend is not our friend.UConn was 3 for 17 last night and 6 for 39 for three against Northwestern and Illinois combined. It shows the dominance of Clingan and just how truly great this team is. What happens when we start knocking down threes?
After 38 games this season and 904 attempts, a very big sample size, the team is a tick under 36%. That's good for 77th in D1. So while not elite, that's not terrible either. They've been off during the NCAA Tournament. But you know what they say about water finding its level? So it's coming. At least that's my hope.Just to play devil's advocate, maybe we're actually not a good three point shooting team?
Devil probably needs no advocate, and pretty likely wouldn't choose you.Just to play devil's advocate, maybe we're actually not a good three point shooting team?
More so against all the high volume 3 point shooting teamsInflategate. Clearly a conspiracy against Uconn.
I just crunched the numbers to see if there's any truth to this. It doesn't look like it, unless you're suggesting there are some geographical anomalies.Balls are overinflated at many neutral sites. Causes 3s to go long.
While we’re not bad at 3s I don’t think we rely on them to win games. Which is a great thing.After 38 games this season and 904 attempts, a very big sample size, the team is a tick under 36%. That's good for 77th in D1. So while not elite, that's not terrible either. They've been off during the NCAA Tournament. But you know what they say about water finding its level? So it's coming. At least that's my hope.
NCAA College Men's Basketball DI current team Stats | NCAA.com
Discover the current NCAA Division I Men's Basketball leaders in every stats category, as well as historic leaders.www.ncaa.com
I think the point was each site had pumped them differently but I have no clue if that’s true.I just crunched the numbers to see if there's any truth to this. It doesn't look like it, unless you're suggesting there are some geographical anomalies.
I looked at all of the 64 teams (didn't bother with the first four) and what they shot cumulatively for the season from deep versus what they shot during March Madness.
Overall, the teams shot a collective 35.36% from three during the season (exclusive of MM), and 34.43% during March Madness. It's been awhile since I took stats but I assume increased level of competition has something to do with the marginally lower percentage.
I also looked at it team by team. We're shooting 8.6% below our 3P average (28.1% vs 36.7%) and have the highest deviation from the mean of any team that made it to the Elite 8. The next closest is Duke, that shot it 5.3% below their 3P average (33.3% vs 38.6%).
Alabama, of teams that made the E8, is at the other end of the spectrum. They're shooting 41.4% in the tournament, which is 4.9% better than their 36.5% season average.
When you're destroying teams the way we've been destroying teams, I just don't see any weakness
We're destroying teams, what more can we do?
Curious if the data suggests a bigger deviation at particular sights than others, or is it pretty much same across the boardI just crunched the numbers to see if there's any truth to this. It doesn't look like it, unless you're suggesting there are some geographical anomalies.
I looked at all of the 64 teams (didn't bother with the first four) and what they shot cumulatively for the season from deep versus what they shot during March Madness.
Overall, the teams shot a collective 35.36% from three during the season (exclusive of MM), and 34.43% during March Madness. It's been awhile since I took stats but I assume increased level of competition has something to do with the marginally lower percentage.
I also looked at it team by team. We're shooting 8.6% below our 3P average (28.1% vs 36.7%) and have the highest deviation from the mean of any team that made it to the Elite 8. The next closest is Duke, that shot it 5.3% below their 3P average (33.3% vs 38.6%).
Alabama, of teams that made the E8, is at the other end of the spectrum. They're shooting 41.4% in the tournament, which is 4.9% better than their 36.5% season average.
Then what happened vs Creighton? What happens if we go 3/20 and Bama shoots 15/30? Our defense is awesome but sometimes teams get really hot from deep. (And what happens if DC and/or SC pick up 2 early fouls?) If we’re not making 3s, we need transition hoops, and for that we need long rebounds. Fewer Bama misses, fewer transition hoops.
I’m not saying that’s likely but 3-point shooting is, in fact, a weakness if we continue shooting this way. 28% is bad.
Good God, stop
You have the best team in the country. Doesn't mean they're going to win every game.
If you can find a problem with this team, that's 1000% on you.
Odd comment. Perhaps the strange neutral courts and backgrounds have more to do with the many misses along with the intense defense being played by the desperate one and done games. Seems like most players are jacked up and out of sync.Balls are overinflated at many neutral sites. Causes 3s to go long.
Well he has 6 days to figure out how to get them to go down.I saw an interview with Karaban. He said the NCAA tournament balls are tacky and overinflated.