- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 3,028
- Reaction Score
- 3,712
Ray Donovan is pretty lackluster through the first four episodes, but then it gets really, really good. Jon Voight is fantastic.
*spoiler alert for those who haven't made it to part way through season two*Oy vey. I'm not really sure what to say to this beyond there's no accounting for taste. Maybe you were too distracted by the fact that season one wasn't in HD.
For whoever's in the middle of season one, there's no exposition. You're not spoon fed plot, so it takes awhile. It's not dumbed down with voiceovers and whatnot. Some people dig the payoff, some don't.
The other thing I have a problem with is higher ups being so concerned with political agendas that they don't let their people do real work. Maybe I'm naive but that just doesn't sound like a situation that would actually happen.
*spoiler alert for those who haven't made it to part way through season two*
I guess my one big problem so far is that all the players who just got trounced in season one are suddenly back together again through some weird coincidence in season two. It just feels way too contrived. Maybe what happens going forward will make up for it.
The other thing I have a problem with is higher ups being so concerned with political agendas that they don't let their people do real work. Maybe I'm naive but that just doesn't sound like a situation that would actually happen.
Like I said - I like it generally and I want to see what happens next, but I don't have near the anticipation of the next episode as I did for GOT or Sopranos.
jleves said:*spoiler alert for those who haven't made it to part way through season two* I guess my one big problem so far is that all the players who just got trounced in season one are suddenly back together again through some weird coincidence in season two. It just feels way too contrived. Maybe what happens going forward will make up for it. The other thing I have a problem with is higher ups being so concerned with political agendas that they don't let their people do real work. Maybe I'm naive but that just doesn't sound like a situation that would actually happen. Like I said - I like it generally and I want to see what happens next, but I don't have near the anticipation of the next episode as I did for GOT or Sopranos.
The other thing I have a problem with is higher ups being so concerned with political agendas that they don't let their people do real work.
Someone here mentioned 'Orphan Black'. Well, I started it and I love it. A+
Thanks.
I started watching a couple months ago and am now current. It's a faced paced show and the main actress does a good job portraying multiple characters. I am also enjoying it.
Through the first 2 seasons, you don't have a full picture of the network of "The Wire" yet. Stick with it. The 5 seasons all tie in together and wrap up perfectly.
Plus, if you are just looking for a pure plot driven story, that's not where The Wire shines, though the plot is decent. Greatness of The Wire is in the acting, character development, setting/cinematography, pace of the storytelling, and overall vibe of the show. Best acting I've ever seen on a TV show by far.
And if you can't laugh at the Bunk, there's something wrong with you.
Funny thing about The Wire is how quickly it became dated. Cell phones became popular right during the making of it, and now with all the tech in the world, the 'technical snafus' in The Wire seems laughable.
The tech is dated, but the social commentary especially in seasons 3 (war on drugs) and 4 (education) is as valid and I might dare to say MORE valid today than a decade ago.
Stick with it. Seriously. It is really dense story telling with a lot of players. So many first time viewers feel the exact same way as you and then when they get through the series see that season one and two really hold up. It is so much to process at first, it takes a while to get the hooks in. For that reason for me, the wire has better rewatch value than any show ever created.
As for contrived, it is actually quite the opposite. The wire is real in ways that other shows dare not even dream of touching. The show creators simon and burns were on the Baltimore news paper and the police force respectively. For example:
Omar is a real person, no kidding.
You are actually ahead of the game if you just "like " it halfway through season 2. I know people who hated the first 2 seasons ( season 2 in particular) and ended up sticking through and it's their favorite show now.
I don't make many guarantees in life but I will bet your estimation of this series will continue to rise as you keep going.
The tech is dated, but the social commentary especially in seasons 3 (war on drugs) and 4 (education) is as valid and I might dare to say MORE valid today than a decade ago.
johnhuskies95 said:Ray Donovan is pretty lackluster through the first four episodes, but then it gets really, really good. Jon Voight is fantastic.
jleves said:The consensus pick has been The Wire and I'm halfway through the second season and while it's good, I'm not seeing how it got so much praise. Does it get better? I like watching it but it's nowhere near Game of Thrones or The Sopranos. It's kind of like an episode of Law and Order drawn out over 12 or 13 weeks with some swearing and a few gratuitous naked scenes. At least I now know the reference to 'Omar's coming!'
intlzncster said:And she's hot! (can't help it) I def agree with that sentiment though. Everyone of her characters feels like a totally different person. I don't even think of it as the same person portraying diff characters. Really well done. And the flamboyant gay guy is funny as hell. Black cop probably has one of the all time great TV scowls.
Which one of her do you like the best?
intlzncster said:Tough tough call. Going drinking? Helena. Too much fun. Probably Sarah overall. I like street smarts. Though it would be nice to be a chick and into Kasima.
I dig Kasima. But Rachel had that cold bitchyness. Helena is a train wreck lol. Sestra.![]()