OT: UNC player accepts $20k, now a question | The Boneyard

OT: UNC player accepts $20k, now a question

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,744
Reaction Score
48,447
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9638041/agent-provided-20k-ex-unc-player

Since this player accepted more than $20k (which is news, since the NCAA wasn't aware of that in the initial investigation) I'd like to know why the basketball program wasn't similarly banned as the football program was. This kid played bball for UNC, so why wasn't the bball team punished?

I know the money was funneled through Butch Davis, but this player was ineligible to play, and he played.
 

rbny1

Gotham Husky Fanatic
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,470
Reaction Score
4,612
Maybe it was fake money, like the fake courses at UNC, so the NCAA doesn't care. Either that, or the NCAA is totally screwed up and punishes little things at some schools and ignores big violations at others (now that isn't possible, is it?).
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,271
Reaction Score
43,448
Maybe it was fake money, like the fake courses at UNC, so the NCAA doesn't care. Either that, or the NCAA is totally screwed up and punishes little things at some schools and ignores big violations at others (now that isn't possible, is it?).
Or may be they gave 20 k to a non athlete and that is a standard policy at North Carolina. Just a farce!
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,225
Reaction Score
14,039
Because a UNC booster funneled money to Emmert.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2012
Messages
64
Reaction Score
22
http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9638041/agent-provided-20k-ex-unc-player

Since this player accepted more than $20k (which is news, since the NCAA wasn't aware of that in the initial investigation) I'd like to know why the basketball program wasn't similarly banned as the football program was. This kid played bball for UNC, so why wasn't the bball team punished?

I know the money was funneled through Butch Davis, but this player was ineligible to play, and he played.



1. He received the money in 2010. His brief stint as a walk-on basketball player that only played in blowouts had ended a season or two prior to that.

2. The NCAA may not have been aware of the exact amount, but they were away of enough of the shenanigans between the agent and the embedded tutor (acting as an agency runner) to declare him ineligible in football.

3. While that brief article does not say it, other more lengthy articles indicate this news is not something earth shattering for the NCAA. The investigation is closed and they already handed out their punishments to UNC for the rules Little broke. What this news is really about is what laws that agent may have broken back in 2010, and what criminal charges he may face under North Carolina state law.




So basically, the basketball team wasn't punished because there was no reason to punish the basketball team. He didn't start breaking the NCAA rules and accepting money until he became a valuable football asset for agents to try and buy off. That did not occur until well after his brief stint as a walk-on at the end of UNC's bench had ended.

Also, you do not know the money was funneled though Butch Davis... because the money was not funneled through Butch Davis. This player was not ineligible to play basketball at the time he sat at the end of UNC's bench either. You don't seem to have a full grasp on the situation based on your post. You might read the lengthy NCAA report to learn the facts.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,271
Reaction Score
43,448
1. He received the money in 2010. His brief stint as a walk-on basketball player that only played in blowouts had ended a season or two prior to that.

2. The NCAA may not have been aware of the exact amount, but they were away of enough of the shenanigans between the agent and the embedded tutor (acting as an agency runner) to declare him ineligible in football.

3. While that brief article does not say it, other more lengthy articles indicate this news is not something earth shattering for the NCAA. The investigation is closed and they already handed out their punishments to UNC for the rules Little broke. What this news is really about is what laws that agent may have broken back in 2010, and what criminal charges he may face under North Carolina state law.




So basically, the basketball team wasn't punished because there was no reason to punish the basketball team. He didn't start breaking the NCAA rules and accepting money until he became a valuable football asset for agents to try and buy off. That did not occur until well after his brief stint as a walk-on at the end of UNC's bench had ended.

Also, you do not know the money was funneled though Butch Davis... because the money was not funneled through Butch Davis. This player was not ineligible to play basketball at the time he sat at the end of UNC's bench either. You don't seem to have a full grasp on the situation based on your post. You might read the lengthy NCAA report to learn the facts.
And your explanation for P. J. Hairston and the rental cars is.......
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
29,744
Reaction Score
48,447
#1 is the only relevant thing.

But, I guess you buy the story that Butch Davis' babysitter was a mover-and-shaker in the college basketball world.

Good for you.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,894
Reaction Score
98,679
And your explanation for P. J. Hairston and the rental cars is.......

It was in 2010.........?? Great explanation........why did last years team get punished for 2008-9 then in Storrs........crappy explanation as expected
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
334
Guests online
2,589
Total visitors
2,923

Forum statistics

Threads
160,120
Messages
4,219,119
Members
10,083
Latest member
unlikejo


.
Top Bottom