Too bad Quinnipiac has to play them next. Would've been nice if QU could've met them next round. Hopefully they can be somewhat competitive.
Apologies for the hot take, but I don’t think this is cool on UConn’s part. Gotta call off the dogs earlier, it is akin to stealing a base up 10 runs or throwing bombs up 4 touchdowns there should be greater sportsmanship if unevenly matched.
Yeah but they lost last year. There's now a faint glimmer of hope.And people wonder why women's basketball is invisible outside of Connecticut. There is a reason that it shows up on ESPN2 across from the NFL.
The UConn bench out scored St Francis .Geno took off the full court pressure mid way in the 1st quarter. They were walking the ball up the court. Can't tell the young ladies to stop playing. By running their offense, they shredded St. Francis.
Zzz...zzz...zzz.In their 1st round game now. Must be a record.
Yeah but they lost last year. There's now a faint glimmer of hope.
He started pulling the starters about 4 minutes into the 2nd half, and he played at least 3 reserves the rest of the way. Starters and 1st reserve didn't play in the 4th quarter.Didn't UConn play their bench most of the 2nd half?
To mix metaphors, Women's College Basketball begins its at bat with an 0-2 count and the umpire knowing the bat is corked. There are legions of people who will never watch women's basketball. I've watched exactly one such game in my life and that was because I knew one of the players. The population of people who will even consider watching the sport is a small subset of sports fans.
And then they see this kind of monstrosity. It confirms every preconception that people have about the quality of the game.
To mix metaphors, Women's College Basketball begins its at bat with an 0-2 count and the umpire knowing the bat is corked. There are legions of people who will never watch women's basketball. I've watched exactly one such game in my life and that was because I knew one of the players. The population of people who will even consider watching the sport is a small subset of sports fans.
And then they see this kind of monstrosity. It confirms every preconception that people have about the quality of the game.
Yep. Also no press in the second half and they walked the ball up the court.Didn't UConn play their bench most of the 2nd half?
The last time I checked the game is about winning not playing down to your competition. Does AL. play down to their competition so the other team can feel better about themselves?!
That game will not deter fans of the sport..and tourney attendance was up this year at most sites...fans know this score is not relevant and Uconn is still beatable. Both Texas and ND had double digit leads on Uconn before the huskies came back and won. They’re struggle with bigs because they’re not very. It will be an interesting tourney starting in Albany. To argue fans won’t watch because Uconn pounded a bad team, 16 seed that had an automatic bid is ridiculous.They can play the game as they like. It makes no difference to me. The amount of attention I have paid to the 2018 Women's NCAA Tournament can be described as "Making a few posts on this thread". When this thread concludes, I will return to a state of benign neglect. I am only making two points.
1. The population of people who will even consider watching Women's basketball is very small.
2. Games that demonstrate the non- competitive nature of the sport will reduce that population even further.
This was a tournament game, for goodness sake. UConn could have conceivably scored 200 points in that game. That wasn't a legitimate competition.
It really should be a 28 team tournament with the top 4 seeds getting bi's.
Almost as insufferable as someone coming along and posting in whatever forum on a thread about the best TV shows, like The Wire and GOT, etc., and some takes the time to post about how they don't even OWN a TV. How gauche. Yeah, feel free to not expend even THIS much effort on women's basketball in the future. I have no idea why you think people with an opinion about the topic are interested in why you think they're stupid.They can play the game as they like. It makes no difference to me. The amount of attention I have paid to the 2018 Women's NCAA Tournament can be described as "Making a few posts on this thread". When this thread concludes, I will return to a state of benign neglect. I am only making two points.
The women had a #16 beat a #1 long before it happened for the men.It really should be a 28 team tournament with the top 4 seeds getting bi's. That's just where the game is at developmentally. The gulf between the top teams and the bottom is just stupid.
Damn! The competition must be wild!The women had a #16 beat a #1 long before it happened for the men.
He started pulling the starters about 4 minutes into the 2nd half, and he played at least 3 reserves the rest of the way. Starters and 1st reserve didn't play in the 4th quarter.
2nd leading scorer in the country, who leads the nation in made 3s plays for SFU. They held her scoreless in the first half.
At half time, SFU had 7 assists. UConn had 3 players with 8 assists each. SFU had 7 rebounds total at the half. UConn had 4 players with 8 rebounds each at the half.