OT Tim Brando: "There is too much privilege in college football" | Page 3 | The Boneyard

OT Tim Brando: "There is too much privilege in college football"

Notre Dame's status is still untested. Clearly ND has a "preferred status" to every G5 team and is a "playoff selectable" team based on its current ranking (#3). However, ND is one of only 4 undefeated teams so we aren't comparing apples to apples.

The better questions is how to does ND rank against a P5 conference champion with the same win/loss record? ND is ranked so high right now because they are undefeated and a number of traditional P5 playoff selectable teams have lost a game (OSU, Oklahoma, Georgia, etc...)

The test will be what happens if ND loses a game? Would a one loss ND be selected over a one loss Big10 champion? What about a one loss ND versus one loss Big 12 champion? Or is it all team dependant? For example, would a one loss Big 12 champion Oklahoma get a playoff spot over a 1 loss ND but a one loss ND selected over a one loss Big12 champion WVU?

Bottom line - every UConn fan should be cheering for ND football to lose a game. What UConn needs is for a one loss ND to get passed over for playoff selection for a couple of one loss P5 champions. The only way ND ever joins a conference is if they believe their independant status hurts their ability to win a championship. Oh, and if ND decides to join a conference, it may start a new shuffle.

This is all fine and dandy conversation for committees and seeding and all that, but it's really just total BS. Notre Dame is always going to get the nod because of money. Specifically TV money.

Until they are squeezed out of independance, there will be no true conference champion playoff format for a national championship at the highest level of college football. That means as long as they hold on to their individualized TV contract - this is all BS to fill the time.
 
I do believe that UCF might have had some culpability in their weak OOC scheduling..

If USF can play Wisconsin, GT, BYU, and Texas the next two years...?

UCF, however, does play Stanford, Pitt, UNC, Georgia Tech the next two years...
 
This is all fine and dandy conversation for committees and seeding and all that, but it's really just total BS. Notre Dame is always going to get the nod because of money. Specifically TV money.

Until they are squeezed out of independance, there will be no true conference champion playoff format for a national championship at the highest level of college football. That means as long as they hold on to their individualized TV contract - this is all BS to fill the time.

Notre Dame hasn't been a regular presence in the BCS Championships or CFP other than their 2012 appearance, getting waxed by Bama.

They usually aren't relevant to the NC game.
 
Until they are squeezed out of independance, there will be no true conference champion playoff format for a national championship at the highest level of college football.

Based on the first rankings we now have a little more data by which to evaluate ND's status. Basically ND was behind a one loss LSU....translation, a big name, premier SEC team with a loss still trumps an undefeated ND.

ND controls its own fate if they win out. But if they lose a game then they are very likely out. For teams like Bama, LSU, Ohio State, Clemson, Michigan and Oklahoma a loss can be overcome to get to the playoff. ND has no such safety net....bottom line, ND will be evaluated above all G5 teams and most P5 programs but will not get special treatment like the premier P5 programs.

I do agree conference realignment still depends on ND. As UConn fans we need ND to a lose a game this year and get replaced by a couple of one loss P5 heavy weights. The real punch in the face for ND would be to have a one loss Michigan go to the playoffs ahead of a one loss ND when they beat Michigan in a head to head match.

Only when ND realizes they are at a competitive disadvantage will they consider joining a conference. Personally I think ND already is...they just don't know it yet.
 
Based on the first rankings we now have a little more data by which to evaluate ND's status. Basically ND was behind a one loss LSU....translation, a big name, premier SEC team with a loss still trumps an undefeated ND.

ND controls its own fate if they win out. But if they lose a game then they are very likely out. For teams like Bama, LSU, Ohio State, Clemson, Michigan and Oklahoma a loss can be overcome to get to the playoff. ND has no such safety net....bottom line, ND will be evaluated above all G5 teams and most P5 programs but will not get special treatment like the premier P5 programs.

I do agree conference realignment still depends on ND. As UConn fans we need ND to a lose a game this year and get replaced by a couple of one loss P5 heavy weights. The real punch in the face for ND would be to have a one loss Michigan go to the playoffs ahead of a one loss ND when they beat Michigan in a head to head match.

Only when ND realizes they are at a competitive disadvantage will they consider joining a conference. Personally I think ND already is...they just don't know it yet.


It knows it, understands it and accepts it. But, it will not give up its independent football status because of it. As long as it legally can compete for the playoffs, even if the path is harder, it will keep the status quo.

Jack Swarbrick was interviewed in August and said this:

"The reason why Notre Dame has the flexibility to schedule such marquee matchups every year is because of its independent status.

Swarbrick doesn’t see the Irish joining a conference any time soon, even if it would make a path to the College Football Playoff easier.

“We don’t choose independence because it helps the football program,” Swarbrick said. “We would have a potentially easier path to a championship in the current model if we were in a conference.

We choose independence because of its benefit for the University and what football represents. It’s our ability to play in New York and California … the ACC lets us travel from Miami to Boston, we’ll play in iconic venues like Lambeau Field — that’s what we need to do.

Don’t get me wrong, our focus has to be winning football games and competing for national championships, but we have this secondary obligation with the program to use it as a vehicle to promote the school, and we look for every opportunity to do that."

Swarbrick comments on the football program and its future // The Observer

This isn't really even an exclusively football related decision. It includes non-football, school marketing factors. ND believes that its independent football status helps to market the school nation wide.

Unless/until a P4 champs only playoff mandates a conference champion to be a playoff team, ND likely ain't budging.
 
Last edited:
It knows it, understands it and accepts it. But, it will not give up its independent football status because of it. As long as it legally can compete for the playoffs, even if the path is harder, it will keep the status quo.

Jack Swarbrick was interviewed in August and said this:

"The reason why Notre Dame has the flexibility to schedule such marquee matchups every year is because of its independent status.

Swarbrick doesn’t see the Irish joining a conference any time soon, even if it would make a path to the College Football Playoff easier.

“We don’t choose independence because it helps the football program,” Swarbrick said. “We would have a potentially easier path to a championship in the current model if we were in a conference.

We choose independence because of its benefit for the University and what football represents. It’s our ability to play in New York and California … the ACC lets us travel from Miami to Boston, we’ll play in iconic venues like Lambeau Field — that’s what we need to do.

Don’t get me wrong, our focus has to be winning football games and competing for national championships, but we have this secondary obligation with the program to use it as a vehicle to promote the school, and we look for every opportunity to do that."

Swarbrick comments on the football program and its future // The Observer

This isn't really even an exclusively football related decision. It includes non-football, school marketing factors. ND believes that its independent football status helps to market the school nation wide.

Unless/until a P4 champs only playoff mandates a conference champion to be a playoff team, ND likely ain't budging.

Swarbick is full of you know what, and so are you.

The reason Notre Dame can maintain independant status is because they hit the jackpot 30 years ago with their exclusive NBC television and media contract. It's entirely about exclusive control of enough benjamins to schedule who they want, when they want, and still get paid.

The rest of this blow harding is nothing but Notre Dame pompousness.
 
.-.
Btw: Regarding pompous blowhardiness, as noted in another thread - the University of Connecticut leadership, the State of Connecticut leadership, and most especially the Connecticut sports media - demonstrated their complete lack of understanding of anything in major intercollegiate athletics nationally - when Notre Dame was proposing and willing to schedule what I think was a 10-12 year series with UConn about a decade ago now.

But hey, we got women's basketball.
 
Am I the only one that hasn’t read a post from TerryD in years because there is no need, he just repeats himself? North Korea net minders would be impressed with your persistence, Russian trolls too.

Big game coming up in NYC this month; a ranked Syracuse team vs a top 5 ND team at yankee stadium. I looked into tickets last weekend, secondary market prices were very impressive, 150 for the worst seats, many seats priced in the 200 to 300 range. If both teams continue to win could College Game Day visit the Bronx? I think so. A November football game between two ranked opponents northeast of Penn St is rare.

Anyway - I was talking to my Syracuse friend (client) and he was all on board that we need ND to lose a game this year and continue to get shut out of the play offs. It’s the only chance we have to push ND to the ACC full time and that it is one of the few ways to trigger more CRA.
 
Am I the only one that hasn’t read a post from TerryD in years because there is no need, he just repeats himself? North Korea net minders would be impressed with your persistence, Russian trolls too.

Big game coming up in NYC this month; a ranked Syracuse team vs a top 5 ND team at yankee stadium. I looked into tickets last weekend, secondary market prices were very impressive, 150 for the worst seats, many seats priced in the 200 to 300 range. If both teams continue to win could College Game Day visit the Bronx? I think so. A November football game between two ranked opponents northeast of Penn St is rare.

Anyway - I was talking to my Syracuse friend (client) and he was all on board that we need ND to lose a game this year and continue to get shut out of the play offs. It’s the only chance we have to push ND to the ACC full time and that it is one of the few ways to trigger more CRA.

Pipe dreams.

Only way to squeeze Notre Dame, (other than the progression to a true national championship playoff of conference champions rather than this current abomination format for a national title - is to keep their non-football sports out of a conference. ACC already bent over and spread wide for them.
 
Pipe dreams.

Only way to squeeze Notre Dame, (other than the progression to a true national championship playoff of conference champions rather than this current abomination format for a national title - is to keep their non-football sports out of a conference. ACC already bent over and spread wide for them.
Pipe Dreams? But then you seem to go on to agree with your incomplete parenthetical. Anyway
 
Pipe Dreams? But then you seem to go on to agree with your incomplete parenthetical. Anyway

I tend to make people confused. But you'll figure it out.

Bottom line is that 1A college football postseason and national championship system right now - the abomination it is - has no incentive to change because it's functioning exactly as it's designed and intended to do, to benefit those it benefits, including Notre Dame.

There is very, very little leverage to be generated to get anything moving to change.

My prediction, is that in about 8-10 years (maybe sooner) the viewership and interest will have declined so much, that the media contracts will be unsustainable - and then at that point, something meaningful might happen to actually complete the process of transitioning the historic bowl system of a college football post season - to a national championship playoff format of conference champions that exists at every other level of college football below 1A and in every other intercollegiate sport.
 
I tend to make people confused. But you'll figure it out.

Bottom line is that 1A college football postseason and national championship system right now - the abomination it is - has no incentive to change because it's functioning exactly as it's designed and intended to do, to benefit those it benefits, including Notre Dame.

There is very, very little leverage to be generated to get anything moving to change.

My prediction, is that in about 8-10 years (maybe sooner) the viewership and interest will have declined so much, that the media contracts will be unsustainable - and then at that point, something meaningful might happen to actually complete the process of transitioning the historic bowl system of a college football post season - to a national championship playoff format of conference champions that exists at every other level of college football below 1A and in every other intercollegiate sport.
Pipe dreams
 
.-.
Swarbick is full of you know what, and so are you.

The reason Notre Dame can maintain independant status is because they hit the jackpot 30 years ago with their exclusive NBC television and media contract. It's entirely about exclusive control of enough benjamins to schedule who they want, when they want, and still get paid.

The rest of this blow harding is nothing but Notre Dame pompousness.

ND would make way more TV money by joining the Big Ten. It would likely make as more, or probably more, if football fully joined the ACC.

It isn't about the most TV money, though.
 
Last edited:
Am I the only one that hasn’t read a post from TerryD in years because there is no need, he just repeats himself? North Korea net minders would be impressed with your persistence, Russian trolls too.

Big game coming up in NYC this month; a ranked Syracuse team vs a top 5 ND team at yankee stadium. I looked into tickets last weekend, secondary market prices were very impressive, 150 for the worst seats, many seats priced in the 200 to 300 range. If both teams continue to win could College Game Day visit the Bronx? I think so. A November football game between two ranked opponents northeast of Penn St is rare.

Anyway - I was talking to my Syracuse friend (client) and he was all on board that we need ND to lose a game this year and continue to get shut out of the play offs. It’s the only chance we have to push ND to the ACC full time and that it is one of the few ways to trigger more CRA.


I just provided quotes from the ND athletic director to counter the silly notion that ND doesn't know the playoffs are harder to make as a football independent.

You guys don't like the message. I get it.
 
Notre Dame hasn't been a regular presence in the BCS Championships or CFP other than their 2012 appearance, getting waxed by Bama.

They usually aren't relevant to the NC game.

Yet here we are talking about them.
 
I just provided quotes from the ND athletic director to counter the silly notion that ND doesn't know the playoffs are harder to make as a football independent.

You guys don't like the message. I get it.
Its silly you police this board solely for this subject. Its weird.
 
Its silly you police this board solely for this subject. Its weird.

I came to this board for potential info back when CR was a real issue. I stayed around and check it once a day or so.

I read all kinds of threads here. I only comment on what I really care about.

Not weird at all.
 
ND would make way more TV money by joining the Big Ten. It would likely make as more, or probably more, if football fully joined the ACC.

It isn't about the most TV money, though.

Sure, it's not about making the most money in payouts, but it is about having complete control of your own money rather than a revenue sharing arrangement with peer institutions, and maintaining an image and mythology of superiority.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,160
Messages
4,555,235
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom