What the announcer actually said was that he ran the third fastest Belmont time of the horses that won the triple crown - and that is technically a correct statement, but his time was actually the second fastest, just behind Secretariat. Sir Barton posted a better time, but it was a shorter race back then 1 3/16 mile vs. 1 1/2 mile. I was on the rail at the finish line when Seattle Slew won the Belmont in 1977 and it was so exciting to watch. I still have my winning ticket. I was almost as excited watching AP do it yesterday. He may not be Big Red, but he is amazing and I was really happy for Bob Baffert.According to Wikipedia, the announcers were wrong. AP had not the third but the sixth fastest time;
Sec, 1974 2:24.0
Easy Goer 1989 2:26.0
AP Indy, 1992 2:26.13
Risen Star 1988 2:26.40
Gallant Man 1957 2:26.60
American Pharoa, 2:26.65
That is still faster than 84 other winners since the race went from a mile and 3/16 to 1.5 miles in 1926. Faster than Citation, War Admiral, Affirmed, and Native Dancer. Not too shabby.
It was the Golden Era with three Triple Crown winners in six years and two back to back. It was simply a great decade for horse racing.Dove into the archives... wow, the 70's had some good horses...
View attachment 9721
Was his jockey named Manson?Sudden flashback reading Milford's post... remember Red Rum?
Beware of horses and jockeys with swastikas etched into their foreheads.Was his jockey named Manson?
Point of information. It has always seemed to me that Secretariat accelerated down the stretch of the Belmont. But if Pharoa was 8 seconds behind Secretariat's time at 3/4 and only 2 seconds behind at the finish, that means that AP actually ran the final 3/4 in six seconds less than did Secretariat. Would someone more knowledgeable than I please explain this?
Not that I know of. Sham finished second to Secretariat in the Derby and Preakness but was eased in the Belmont and finished last. Never raced again and that would become all too common if horses were required to race in all three.
The 1978 3 year old TC series when Affirmed and Alydar faced each other was easily the best TC races I've ever watched.
Alydar got his revenge in the breeding barn where he became a much more prolific sire than Affirmed.
Actually, AP was 3.8 seconds behind Secretariat at the 3/4 mark (1:09.4 v 1:13.2 (1/5th seconds)) and 3.2 seconds behind at the 1 1/4 mark. He ended up 2.6 seconds of the record coming home in an impressive 24.31 seconds for the final quarter-mile.
In fact, AP ran negative splits for the race. Each quarter mile was faster or equal to the previous one.
Thanks. Someone had posted the "8 seconds" figure and I assumed it was correct, but it just did not seem reasonable that AP could have made up that much time. It is still remarkable that he made up any time at all on Secretariat over the last 3/4 mile, especially since he had had the lead from the git-go..
.
Well, at 30+" lengths that is a pretty accurate description of Secretariat's win in the Belmont.
To you both, I was merely illustrating how weak this field was that no one even tried to challenge. He was 2 seconds slower than Secretariat. He is a fine horse, but a fine horse in a dismal year of racing.
A triple crown .... 8 seconds slower than Secretariats at the 3/4 poll. What a dismal field.
I'm guessing you rarely watch horse racing, which is all right because no one else does either...
But you're wrongheaded here...
First, it's actually a pretty good crop of three-year olds and the field certainly did try to challenge the winner - three horses made their run at him on the turn. Unfortunately for them, American Pharoah ran the sixth-fastest Belmont ever and likely ran the fastest final quarter mile split in any Belmont. They were just run off their feet - no one is closing into a final quarter of 24.3 in a mile and a half race.
The horse that finished second ran his Belmont in about 2:27.50 - time is a tricky metric in horse racing, but that time would have won all but about a dozen Belmonts. (On that tricky metric....do you believe that Frosted is ten lengths faster than Seattle Slew? Probably not, but if you stake it all on time, there you are.)
Back to Secretariat....his 2:24 is the 56-game hitting streak of horse racing. No horse before or since has run a 2:24 on dirt - it's untouchable. It's the single finest and fastest performance in racing history. Deriding a horse's performance based on Secretariat's Belmont is like mocking the pilot who just landed your Delta Shuttle because Neil Armstrong once flew a rocket to the moon.
Sham paid the price for that, didn't he?
No horse's time looks good in comparison to Secretariat. 2:24 is just not a realistic time for 1 1/2 miles. Fact is he ran the 6th best 1 1/2 mile Belmont time. Better than Affirmed, better than Seattle Slew.
Even if you are a curmudgeon like Andrew Beyer and note that the track was very fast, 2:26.65 is a nice time especially given that he ran that relatively unchallenged. I think he had more in the tank if he needed it.
Orang ... that 8 seconds slower thing is wrong - some postgame commentator error I picked up - it was much better than that. I'm definitely a curmudgeon - out of step - on this one, though, I freely confess and admit. My family (we all are riders - me thorouhbreds mostly) has kicked me around the block on this one!
True, they might burn down the house.You just can't trust them talking heads at all, hardly!
Rocky, my wife follows horse racing incredibly intensely.She follows it year round in the US and abroad. She studies the lineage, the genetics, and watches racing daily on the HRC on satellite. The make up of this year's collection of horses was excellent. Note how many entries turned out for the Derby and then stayed for the other races. Their trainers truly expected they had quality horses and believed they could take a TC race. Another part that American Pharoah overcame was larger fields than Secretariat faced. Watch those old races and it is amazing how few the entries including at the Derby. Secretariat simply was a beast of an animal but American Pharoah faced some challenges Secretariat never faced including running the Derby from the 17th slot, those torrentials and the muddy to sopping wet Preakness track, and then ran away in the Belmont from start to finish with more left in the tank while gliding in at the line than any other horse. It was an awesome TC this year and a real test of horses and racing.I know I'm an outlier on this one - even wrongheaded, but think Pharoah is a fine, fine horse. Asfar as the crop of three year olds thouh, I have to disagree. It's a racing industry line. I have a brother who has worked race handicapping and track jobs of "putting the field together" for 35+ years and he and the trainers he knows have been shaking there heads over this bunch since very early this year. I gather Pharoah will compete this year, then retire per breeding rights contract. I do expect him to continue to do very well.