RockyMTblue2
Don't Look Up!
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 22,395
- Reaction Score
- 99,191
Rocky, my wife follows horse racing incredibly intensely.She follows it year round in the US and abroad. She studies the lineage, the genetics, and watches racing daily on the HRC on satellite. The make up of this year's collection of horses was excellent. Note how many entries turned out for the Derby and then stayed for the other races. Their trainers truly expected they had quality horses and believed they could take a TC race. Another part that American Pharoah overcame was larger fields than Secretariat faced. Watch those old races and it is amazing how few the entries including at the Derby. Secretariat simply was a beast of an animal but American Pharoah faced some challenges Secretariat never faced including running the Derby from the 17th slot, those torrentials and the muddy to sopping wet Preakness track, and then ran away in the Belmont from start to finish with more left in the tank while gliding in at the line than any other horse. It was an awesome TC this year and a real test of horses and racing.
I won't belabor it Ice. You find me a thoroughbred who people prep for the derby whose lineage isn't excellent. Thoroughbreds are pretty inbred on the sire side. Heck, a thoroughbred I owned and rode for years, retired off the track as a 4 year old having never won a race. He had impeccable breeding and was fast a sin for 3/4 of a mile, then not so much. On the quality of this year's crop, I'll stick with the racing insider and the national trainers he knows. The Derby field was pretty large, but that supports my point - everybody thought they had a shot in this indifferent breed year. The field fell off in the Preakness and those very sloppy conditions were something Pharoah was comfortable with. Still, without doubt he dominated on his way to the Triple Crown.