KnightBridgeAZ
Grand Canyon Knight
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,624
- Reaction Score
- 9,991
Have to say that, as a shy but brainy kid, I wasn't able to get into colleges (Yale among them) way back in 1974 because I wasn't "well-rounded". So it isn't new.I've got to disagree. Having recently been through the college admission process, twice - many colleges are doing away with emphasis on GPA and are eliminating the SAT/ACT requirements. Instead, the schools want the applicants to write an additional essay explaining their community service or interaction with the community (volunteerism, activities, church groups, etc). We were told the schools don't want just good students, they want well-rounded individuals.
My oldest son applied to MIT, with his 4.3 GPA and whatever ridiculous SAT scores he had. When he went to the school for a tour, the Admissions officer said "We already know you're smart. Now tell us how you're going to enrich the community at MIT". MIT doesn't have class standings. The school wants students to work cooperatively to solve problems, even assigning them to study groups so that students can help each other rather than just sit in a lecture hall, study alone in their room, take a test, and move on. MIT wants student to learn the material, not just memorize it long enough to pass a test. My boy ended up at Worcester Polytech, which has a very similar system to MIT. The philosophy is that the school doesn't want kids in their rooms cramming for tests all day; it wants them out in the college community, being hands on, engaging in extracurriculars, learning to work in teams, challenging them to think rather than recite by rote.
Forcing kids to concentrate on their GPA rather than the subject at hand is counter-productive. In a highly competitive environment where GPA becomes priority #1, the kids become stressed and poorly educated. As a mom of 2 college kids, I like the current system better.
Incidentally, colleges give honor cords, same as most high schools, that recognize excellence in certain subjects, with each cord a different color and representing a different subject. My oldest had 11 honor cords plus the Presidential medal of academic achievement hanging around his neck when he graduated from high school and I expect he'll have the same when he graduates from college next year (all A's except for one B after three years). Excellence is recognized.
Competition in sports is different. It's very discouraging to kids that go all out to excel in a sport to get the same recognition as someone who showed up just 'cause their parents made them go. Different topic altogether.
On a high school level, I have mixed opinions about recognition at graduation - I was #11 in my school of 700+, the 10 ahead of me all had perfect grades. But in those days, it would have been relatively tough to game the system, there were not that many options (since what were called "vo-tech" classes didn't count to GPA, nor did Phys Ed classes). I took 3 "AP" classes, others didn't necessarily, but they weren't taking courses to game the system either.
I like the changes in the better schools where it is not all about the grade you get. And that system will work for the level of student you have in an MIT, Worcester Polytech, Ivy League, etc. - but in plenty of colleges there is a portion of the student base that ultimately is about getting a degree, and not so much about how much they contribute to their college community.