pinotbear
Silly Ol' Bear
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 3,781
- Reaction Score
- 8,182
Reading the article, it seems to me that the crux of the problem wasn't competition, per se, but that the competition had, to a degree, "gone rogue". My daughters' high school handled the "bunny course GPA inflation" aspect of this by weighting courses by difficulty: an A in introductory basket-weaving wasn't equal to an A in IB Physics. As far as being too cut-throat, or creating an unhealthy atmosphere, a strong, skilled school leadership team ought to be able to nip that in the bud - particularly if it is made very clear to THE PARENTS that, in the words of "The Quiet Man", "the proprieties will be observed."
Competition and recognition go hand-in-hand, and are a good thing. But, like so many good things in life, it has to be managed, kept in its "proper perspective". That's on the parents and the school leadership. Eliminating recognition is a pretty strong signal that they adults involved are shirking that responsibility.
Competition and recognition go hand-in-hand, and are a good thing. But, like so many good things in life, it has to be managed, kept in its "proper perspective". That's on the parents and the school leadership. Eliminating recognition is a pretty strong signal that they adults involved are shirking that responsibility.