OT: Oubre Going Pro | Page 2 | The Boneyard

OT: Oubre Going Pro

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
13,957
Reaction Score
74,110
He didn't do much all year and, inexplicably, seemed to stay near the top of most of the mocks I've seen.
 

Fishy

Elite Premium Poster
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
18,219
Reaction Score
132,846
I've only watched him a few times. I thought he was supposed to be a great athlete with a streaky shot and a non existent handle?

It turns out that he's merely a good athlete with a streaky shot and a partially existent handle.

The kid only played 21 minutes a game this year.
 
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,790
Reaction Score
26,250
I saw this kid a few times in high school. Thought he would be a stud. This year, he was anything but.
 

BUConn10

Artist formerly known as BUHusky10
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
4,052
Reaction Score
10,536
He didn't do much all year and, inexplicably, seemed to stay near the top of most of the mocks I've seen.
Big part of this can be attributed to hype, as cliche as that sounds. The name of the program plays a big role sometimes, ie look at how Drummond and Embiid fared after very similar seasons at UConn and KU respectively. Had almost identical numbers in one season, similar rankings in HS (id even say Drummond was more hyped coming in), yet Drummond plummeted to #9 while Embiid (even WITH a known serious injury during draft workouts) had lots of people saying to take him over Wiggins! Same product, different packaging, and theirs is shinier.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
306
Reaction Score
810
Big part of this can be attributed to hype, as cliche as that sounds. The name of the program plays a big role sometimes, ie look at how Drummond and Embiid fared after very similar seasons at UConn and KU respectively. Had almost identical numbers in one season, similar rankings in HS (id even say Drummond was more hyped coming in), yet Drummond plummeted to #9 while Embiid (even WITH a known serious injury during draft workouts) had lots of people saying to take him over Wiggins! Same product, different packaging, and theirs is shinier.

Numbers aren't everything. There were some decent moments for Drummond but he was very inconsistent and he just didn't look very fluid out there. Embiid on the other hand had great footwork and a great feel for the game as well as great movement. Embiid was much better as a collegiate athlete. That being said, at the moment with Embiid and his injuries I'm taking AD over Embiid if I'm an NBA franchise.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2011
Messages
306
Reaction Score
810
Big part of this can be attributed to hype, as cliche as that sounds. The name of the program plays a big role sometimes, ie look at how Drummond and Embiid fared after very similar seasons at UConn and KU respectively. Had almost identical numbers in one season, similar rankings in HS (id even say Drummond was more hyped coming in), yet Drummond plummeted to #9 while Embiid (even WITH a known serious injury during draft workouts) had lots of people saying to take him over Wiggins! Same product, different packaging, and theirs is shinier.

Numbers aren't everything. There were some decent moments for Drummond but he was very inconsistent and he just didn't look very fluid out there. Embiid on the other hand had great footwork and a great feel for the game as well as great movement. Embiid was much better as a collegiate athlete. That being said, at the moment with Embiid and his injuries I'm taking AD over Embiid if I'm an NBA franchise.
 

pnow15

Previously pnete
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
4,662
Reaction Score
2,638
The NBA ball is not a better product. It could be. It could be great but greed and television money are killing it.
First thing the NBA needs to do is raise the starting age to 20 years old. The road is a tough place for a young guy. And it hurts a players development sitting on the bench. Nobody should be sitting on a bench on the basis of potential, only merit. The DLeague is the place for potential. Or college.
Second thing is the amount of games. There are just way too many games and way too many games where players go through the motions playing four games in five nights. Cut the schedules to 60 games. Then you will start seeing college ball intensity on the court for every game.
Players will be fresh for every game and every game will have real meaning. Poor starts will have real meaning. Guys on the bench will need to be NBA ready. Fans won't be talking on their cell phones bored.
Only teams with five hundred records or better make the regular playoffs.
If one division doesn't have enough 500 hundred teams, take them from other division. Move the lower seeds into the other division.
If you don't have enough teams, then take best record teams and hold a one game play in.
Only the best get to play post season.
All playoff series are best of seven.
After very season, teams can protect ten players and then there is a dispersal draft.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,782
Reaction Score
98,010
I saw this kid a few times in high school. Thought he would be a stud. This year, he was anything but.

"anything but" isn't quite the description of his freshman year. He was closer to a stud than not. There's a lot there and it was evident more often than not. He should have stayed a full year and gotten in 30 minutes a game next year but they their a whole new group of athletes now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
294
Guests online
1,954
Total visitors
2,248

Forum statistics

Threads
159,076
Messages
4,179,493
Members
10,049
Latest member
MTSuitsky


.
Top Bottom