My opinion is that it isn't sexist. I agree with the poster who said that a fan of a niche sport was trolling and the response was appropriate. If it had been a fan of the UConn polo team or the UConn men's golf team throwing shade, the reaction would probably have been the same.If this had been said about women's basketball, is the response from Oregon MBB the same? I'd say probably not but we can't be sure. More interestingly, though, if this had been said about women's basketball, is it sexist? I think you could argue no just as easily as you can argue that the tweet in question was sexist. Sexism falls under the category of power disparity and power disparity is ultimately what feminism tries to interrogate. If field hockey can be belittled, then so too could women's basketball, I'd argue. Otherwise we're assigning a level of importance to women's basketball that can then be used against us - and has been used against us - as a punchline for the current state of our athletic department.
It's definitely a bad decision to tweet that out, not because it's unfunny but because you can't disparage another sport when you're the official account of Oregon basketball and by association the school as a whole. Not a big deal, but I can see what people would find it problematic.
My opinion is that it isn't sexist. I agree with the poster who said that a fan of a niche sport was trolling and the response was appropriate. If it had been a fan of the UConn polo team or the UConn men's golf team throwing shade, the reaction would probably have been the same.
Put the shovel down.In retrospect, I probably should have expected this response to creating this thread. I myself am sick of overly-critical PC bull crap I see in the news every day. . . If our official MBB social media account took a crap on another sport within our athletic department, I imagine some people would be critical.