My paragraph of truth does not even compare to the volumes of BS that have been spewed about this topic from people that have entirely no clue what they are talking about...inhaling clear air man, some people can have intelligent things to say about this topic believe it or not...
Wha?? From which references did you fconclude this?? Every journal article that I've read state differently. It leaves permanent effects on brain development- and brain develops to ~ age 25. Legislation is creating a generation of s that will further impact the social systems already more than taxed. A liberal utopia?
I used to work summers selling T-Shirts at the Meadows in Hartford. The more pot-oriented crowds were great to deal with. Everything went smoothly, no fights, no nothing. The problem was the country shows and shows like DMB where the majority of the people there had already slugged back 10 Miller lights before entering the show. Then the rate of fighting, attempted theft from the stands, and hospital trips for the concert-goers skyrocketed. It's not my thing now that I work full time because it does affect memory but the fact that it is illegal is absurd.I have no scientific evidence, but I am pretty convinced that pot alone would not make you even consider the knockout game, unless perhaps the person was holding a big bag of Cheetos (and you were already off the couch). Heard lots of stories about drunken bar brawls, but not many at Grateful Dead shows. (I was going to include Jimmy Buffett in that, but turns out there actually was a guy killed in a fight outside a Buffett concert in 2012. Who knew?)
Personally, in my younger days, I enjoyed the mellow feeling of being high a lot more than the out of control feeling of being drunk. It was more up my alley. Not to mention I felt a lot better the next morning.
It sounds like you read the best journals.
or studies that don't have a large enough sample size. i've read a lot of journal articles and almost none of them study enough people to be able to make an accurate analysis.I'm guessing journal summaries from less than partial sources.
Wha?? From which references did you fconclude this?? Every journal article that I've read state differently. It leaves permanent effects on brain development- and brain develops to ~ age 25. Legislation is creating a generation of s that will further impact the social systems already more than taxed. A liberal utopia?
Does this mean that you're for the banning of Alcohol? That also has permanent effects on brain development. How about tobacco or unhealthy foods? The medical problems those lead to are a huge strain on social health programs.Wha?? From which references did you fconclude this?? Every journal article that I've read state differently. It leaves permanent effects on brain development- and brain develops to ~ age 25. Legislation is creating a generation of s that will further impact the social systems already more than taxed. A liberal utopia?
You definitely aren't the fictional weed dealer, Dante from Grandma's Boy either...
![]()
Or have been around stoners...
That's the best anti-legalization argument. I've never met anyone who is into weed that wasn't really really into weed. It's worse than a bunch of fantasy football guys.
Enabling that crowd doesn't seem like it would benefit anyone. You can here it here already. Can't wait to get my medical card? Really. If the procedures hold up, it's a market of 2000 oz /month for the entire state. Do what you want, but I've always likened it to being around a bunch of drunks. But harmful, it isn't.
Implying that everyone who uses acts like Cheech & Chong is about as true as saying that everyone who drinks gets hammered all the time. There's a logical issue in your point. If they're not "really really into weed", then you probably wouldn't ever know that they smoke. Furthermore, legalization doesn't really enable that crowd all that much. If you're a stoner, it's not like it's hard to get or you're going to be put off by it being illegal.Or have been around stoners...
That's the best anti-legalization argument. I've never met anyone who is into weed that wasn't really really into weed. It's worse than a bunch of fantasy football guys.
Enabling that crowd doesn't seem like it would benefit anyone. You can here it here already. Can't wait to get my medical card? Really. If the procedures hold up, it's a market of 2000 oz /month for the entire state. Do what you want, but I've always likened it to being around a bunch of drunks. But harmful, it isn't.
Implying that everyone who uses acts like Cheech & Chong is about as true as saying that everyone who drinks gets hammered all the time. There's a logical issue in your point. If they're not "really really into weed", then you probably wouldn't ever know that they smoke. Furthermore, legalization doesn't really enable that crowd all that much. If you're a stoner, it's not like it's hard to get or you're going to be put off by it being illegal.
I work in Big 4 accounting, I assure you that I'm around them every day at work.LOL.. yeah really.. I tell people all the time, people who wanna get high are already getting high. Trust me. And you're around them every day of your life. Probably at work.
Or have been around stoners...
That's the best anti-legalization argument. I've never met anyone who is into weed that wasn't really really into weed. It's worse than a bunch of fantasy football guys.
Enabling that crowd doesn't seem like it would benefit anyone. You can here it here already. Can't wait to get my medical card? Really. If the procedures hold up, it's a market of 2000 oz /month for the entire state. Do what you want, but I've always likened it to being around a bunch of drunks. But harmful, it isn't.
If there is ever an industry that needs more weed, it's public accounting (not just Big 4).I work in Big 4 accounting, I assure you that I'm around them every day at work.
If there is ever an industry that needs more weed, it's public accounting (not just Big 4).
That's a sentiment that doesn't really hold up in practice. I guarantee you you're around people all the time who don't fit your outmoded notion of the "stoner" and are probably getting high pretty regularly.
I like weed. I really like it. I also spend probably 80-100 hours a week in the office or traveling for work in a pretty pressurized industry, and I don't think I display any of the "stoner" characteristics that you're probably talking about. It's just that when I get home from work at midnight I like to relax with a joint rather than a glass of scotch. I know countless - countless - high achieving professionals who feel the same way. Those dudes from Half Baked are an infinitesimally small segment of the weed-loving population. It's actually pretty alarming that in 2014 people don't recognize that.
Or have been around stoners...
That's the best anti-legalization argument. I've never met anyone who is into weed that wasn't really really into weed. It's worse than a bunch of fantasy football guys.
Enabling that crowd doesn't seem like it would benefit anyone. You can here it here already. Can't wait to get my medical card? Really. If the procedures hold up, it's a market of 2000 oz /month for the entire state. Do what you want, but I've always likened it to being around a bunch of drunks. But harmful, it isn't.
I know. I was there.There definitely aren't many industries where the stereotype and reality are farther apart.... at least on the audit side.
That crowd doesn't seem to be too concerned about whether you legalize pot or not. In fact, I don't think it's possible for most of them to smoke any more than they already do.
It's the casual smokers who care.
↑And....that pretty much sums up the anti-pot crowd.