I don't know why people get so emotional and personal about this. This is just business. And it's just basketball. They're playing a game of chicken that may end in a wreck, but, unlike real chicken, they can just play again over the winter and summer.
I can't say which side I think is better positioned nor which is correct as a matter of fairness, because I don't have all the numbers.
How much money is coming in? How much goes to the players? To the owners? And so on. Without knowing the exact numbers, how could I have an opinion? Part of the problem, I read, was that the players and owners can't even agree on what the actual profits are. Revenues? Revenues smevenues. What difference does it make what your revenues are if you are not showing a profit?
1 Million in revenues, 1 Million and 10 bucks in costs, and you lost 10 bucks for the year.
In the end, does anybody really feel badly for men with sufficient net worth to own basketball franchises? Or men getting paid millions of dollars to play what amounts to a children's game for adults? These folks are all grown men, and they know what the deal is.
Let 'em get in the mud and wrestle I say. Millionaires affairs.
Regarding fans leaving and all that. Meh. As was noted above, they'll come back. This agreement is going to last a lot longer than any fan apathy.