I am grossly uncomfortable with this conversation being conducted in the fashion in which it is currently unfolding. I don't think either of you has insulted the other's intelligence once.
Posters that say "I wish him nothing but the best." make me want to vomit. I want him to crash and burn (not literally of course.).
Posters that say "I wish him nothing but the best." make me want to vomit. I want him to crash and burn (not literally of course.).
If he stays in the draft, do we still count this as a big swing and a miss by Ollie, or Miller? I understand we put a lot of effort into his recruitment, but it's not like we'd be losing him to someone else.
you using your Jerry Crystal Ball with that assessment? Who says he goes lottery?? And even if he does, lottery + out of the league in 3yrs would be cooke-esque.Except Lenny Cooke went undrafted and Diallo will be a fringe lottery pick. But other than that you nailed it!
No I am using mock drafts. Try them. Or use the internet: ""He'd be a first-round pick if he stays in [the draft]," an NBA scout told CBS Sports on Sunday."you using your Jerry Crystal Ball with that assessment? Who says he goes lottery?? And even if he does, lottery + out of the league in 3yrs would be cooke-esque.
the comparison is more about attitude and approach. if im one of the best players in the draft, im not hiding on a practice court. id be out there busting my butt when it mattered to showcase my skill, flaws and all.
Yea, because Mock Drafts are always so accurate... and because being a "fringe lottery" selection is always so indicative of future success.No I am using mock drafts. Try them.
Your comment about attitude and approach is laughable (almost as laughable as him being out of the league in 3 years). He is draft eligible, but you think he has a bad attitude because he does not want to go to UK and play for free and go to school for a year over making millions of dollars? No its called hes not an idiot.
Cooke never played in an NBA game. Just stop with this comparison its horrible.
Yes because of the other guys we lost because of itIf he stays in the draft, do we still count this as a big swing and a miss by Ollie, or Miller? I understand we put a lot of effort into his recruitment, but it's not like we'd be losing him to someone else.
Since you edited the above and used a quote to strengthen your argument... here's one for you from the last person to coach him in an organized basketball game just a few months agoNo I am using mock drafts. Try them. Or use the internet: ""He'd be a first-round pick if he stays in [the draft]," an NBA scout told CBS Sports on Sunday."
Your points are fine, but they have nothing to do with the Lenny Cooke comparison. Cooke was not drafted. Never played in the NBA. Horrible comparison. The Gerlad Green comparison is much better, great athlete, lotta of questions about desire and being raw, will kick around the NBA for a bunch of years, and may or may not develop into a good player at that level.Yea, because Mock Drafts are always so accurate... and because being a "fringe lottery" selection is always so indicative of future success.
How can you disageee with his actions this year being a reflection of his attitude and approach? he was eligible this year but instead of playing, he hid at Putnam for the first semester and then at a UK practice facility
All because his handlers and him knew he had a better shot of being initially drafted if he wasn't exposed. he wasted a key year of major development and a great opportunity so he could sit on a bench.
It might help his draft position right now, but it won't help in the long run. ill take the kid who wants to play, and shows a work ethic and attitude to want to get better - his own coach alluded to that. you can draft the guy hiding in the locker room based on some mock draft
Again, the comparison was purely based on attitude and approach - especially these past two years. Cooke also loved the spotlight, listened to the wrong people, and attempted to take an easier route to the NBA because he thought he 'should' be playing in he league.Your points are fine, but they have nothing to do with the Lenny Cooke comparison. Cooke was not drafted. Never played in the NBA. Horrible comparison. The Gerlad Green comparison is much better, great athlete, lotta of questions about desire and being raw, will kick around the NBA for a bunch of years, and may or may not develop into a good player at that level.
No one said where someone is drafted is indicative of future success. The point is he is not Lenny Cooke who again went undrafted.
You mean like Waters?The kids who fear competition are exactly the ones who need to be exposed to it.
You mean like Waters?
Well, sort of, in that our pursuit of Hami led to us missing on other players who would be here now if we figured out sooner we weren't even going to get him to enroll in summer camp here (Bruce Brown, for instance).If he stays in the draft, do we still count this as a big swing and a miss by Ollie, or Miller? I understand we put a lot of effort into his recruitment, but it's not like we'd be losing him to someone else.
Waters isn't good enough to be a 1 and done IMO if that is what you mean. He would e nice to get but what we really need is a beefy big and a shooter.I still think Waters is thinking of showcasing his talent for a year in order to get picked up by one of the big boys. jmo tho
Waters isn't good enough to be a 1 and done IMO if that is what you mean. He would e nice to get but what we really need is a beefy big and a shooter.
Not what I meant. I was implying he wanted to go somewhere to be THE guy and showcase his skills. So that he could transfer to one of the big boy schools he really wants to go to. The idea being, they see how good he is, and sign him up.
That logic makes no sense. Why would someone like waters want to showcase his skills with the goal of sitting out a year?Not what I meant. I was implying he wanted to go somewhere to be THE guy and showcase his skills. So that he could transfer to one of the big boy schools he really wants to go to. The idea being, they see how good he is, and sign him up.
Usually you're my guy, but can't say I agree here.Not what I meant. I was implying he wanted to go somewhere to be THE guy and showcase his skills. So that he could transfer to one of the big boy schools he really wants to go to. The idea being, they see how good he is, and sign him up.
While they are certainly well intentioned parents, they fail to realize they have the most biased and non neutral opinions on the planet when evaluating their son.
My conclusions, specifically on well intentioned parents leading their influential teenagers down a poor road, was based on the examples I gave. Oriakhi. Soon to be Vance.As opposed to message board posters. I'm not sure you're the guy to be making these points - you're drawing all sorts of conclusions about a kid you've never met based on some pretty convoluted speculation.