- Joined
- Nov 21, 2012
- Messages
- 4,634
- Reaction Score
- 9,910
Probably, but that's not a win for clearing his name or the Pats clearing theirs, which was the whole purpose of Kraft's appeal.Even money that Brady's suspension gets cut in half.
Probably, but that's not a win for clearing his name or the Pats clearing theirs, which was the whole purpose of Kraft's appeal.Even money that Brady's suspension gets cut in half.
- Anyone glad that the pat's are facing a 'real' team in their opening against the pack because if they were playing the Bucs or other weak team, even without Brady, the final score would be like 77 to 0? Bellichick has been know to carry grudges and make 'enemies' pay for it.
As a Patriots fan, such a beautiful meme. One controversial man. The man's going to remain a legend.
Agreed doesn't have to share phone but to then destroy it - why?If a non government entity or a government entity without a warrant wanted my phone, I'd tell them in so many words to take a hike.
If I'm Tom Brady rich, I take the 4 weeks and head to the Seychelles and not worry one bit about legacy.
I think this whole thing is another example of the NFL not having its act together.
The correct answer should have been a fine with new procedures and clear penalties for doctoring game FB's. This whole thing was 90% back pedaling make it up as you go nonsense.
And I don't even like the Pats.
What if your employer wanted your phone on suspicion of you cheating the company, for which you'd be suspended for a significant time without pay? You wouldn't hand it over if you had nothing to hide?If a non government entity or a government entity without a warrant wanted my phone, I'd tell them in so many words to take a hike.
Shady Brady and Belicheat made their own bed.
What if your employer wanted your phone on suspicion of you cheating the company, for which you'd be suspended for a significant time without pay? You wouldn't hand it over if you had nothing to hide?
Derp
Agreed doesn't have to share phone but to then destroy it - why?
Here's the thing. They have the two idiots phones. Who else do they think that he texted? It was a fishing expedition.
Want to fine Brady for not cooperating? Feel free but make it within the previously established guidelines. Want to fine him for deflating? Better have some evidence. Oh and it probably best not to issue that a report that says that any loss is entirely explainable by physics. (There's so much more wrong in that report and with all that led up to it, but there's no need to go there once you decide, as the NFL's science experts did, that any pressure loss was within the amounts that you'd expect given the conditions.)
That said if this whole destroyed the phone thing is legit (and not explainable by dropping in the toilet or something similar) then Brady would have been far smarter just to say he wasn't cooperating and leave it at that.
Once suit is filed in federal court, science takes a back seat to procedure. Though they certainly have that in their back pocket. Kesler is going to argue that regardless who announced the original penalties, it was not done in a vacuum. The penalties were determined by Goodell. Goodell then sat as appellate judge some 4 months later.
Goodell knew that this thing was going to court as soon as he authorized the punishment and that there is a positive non-zero (probably mid-double digits or higher) percent chance he loses. That is why 1) he upheld the original 4 games and 2) he fined the organization as well. Kraft had much less recourse than Brady does.
Goodell can now go back to the other 31 owners, especially the Colts and Ravens, and say, "Any reduction is out of my hands." Doty will do one of two things, IMO. Throw it back to the NFL and say get an appropriate arbiter who will throw out the ruling, considering the Hardy reduction, or 2) Follow his own precedent and toss the suspension.