Hope it goes better than the last time
Consider that a foul in soccer, in the box, is like a technical foul in basketball, where your best FT shooter does in fact take the foul shot.So, here's another problem with soccer: The person who is fouled doesn't have to take the penalty shot! How does that make any sense? What other sport has this rule? Can you imagine basketball where your best free throw shooter takes all the foul shots? SMH
Which players were selected based on their social media following?An. Maybe next time, the U.S. can compose a team based on talent & current onfield capabilities & not on number of social media followers they have.
It appears we have entered a new era, where there is a balance of talent in many nations that we used to dominate.All I know is women's soccer gets to play for a bronze. Women's softball achieved silver with no hitting. Both teams (effort) were disappointing to me. (Coaching, etc....)
I don't necessarily agree with term limits, but yes. The issues with this team is the same that is confronting the WBB team: age and a decline in abilities. Not coaching. You can't arrest time. Often those involved in the selection processes and those who play need to be shown, not told the truth. I fear the WBB team will be shown that truth against Australia. Again. This is a good thing, and come the next World's and Olympics this country will be better represented.Daughter played club for years. We watched the USA selection process bypass many talented and deserving players only to keep “old” passed their prime players on the roster. The process needs to change like yesterday! Maybe there should be term limits lol
IN the MF, Horan (27), Lavelle (25), Ertz (29), S. Mewis (28) are pretty much prime age.An embarrassing effort by the US team, plain-and-simple. This is a decent, but not overwhelming Canada team, to say the least. To not score a goal against them just speaks to the old, slow composition of the team in the striker/midfield positions. Maybe next time, the U.S. can compose a team based on talent & current onfield capabilities & not on number of social media followers they have.
Also, I believe there has never been a team that has won the WC and Olympics in consecutive years.It is also worth noting that the US NT in soccer has never been dominant in the way we look at USA basketball - last Olympics they were 5th (no medal) so they have actually improved on 2016 already. The longest consecutive WC run is currently 2.
I don't necessarily agree with term limits, but yes. The issues with this team is the same that is confronting the WBB team: age and a decline in abilities. Not coaching. You can't arrest time.
Your comment deserves a thousand likes. It's refreshing to see that some people here get it and actually watch soccer.Team sports are always a merger between athletes, styles of play, and coaches. If you follow European men's soccer, you see how important the coaches are, how delicate the composition of teams is, and how the matching of coach and player and style of play can change the perception of player (and coach.)
USA Soccer at this Olympics looks like it has a problem in that balance and I don't think you can point to the players or their age as the cause. They have a new coach and the team flow on the field looks spotty. Soccer is also generally a very low scoring game that relies on individual moments of brilliance during 90+ minutes of competition - close matches can easily be determined by brilliant save, or as in the Canada match a moment of inattention by a defender.
It is also worth noting that the US NT in soccer has never been dominant in the way we look at USA basketball - last Olympics they were 5th (no medal) so they have actually improved on 2016 already. The longest consecutive WC run is currently 2.