So to sum up:
1) After 2014, Kevin Ollie wasn't a very successful coach at UConn.
2) After 2014, Kevin Ollie wasn't a very engaged coach at UConn.
3) Kevin Ollie committed numerous violations of NCAA rules including impermissible benefits to players.
4) Kevin Ollie repeated lied about these violations to his employers in writing.
5) Under the terms of his contract violations of NCAA rules terminates the obligations to any future earnings under the contract.
6) Kevin received proper notice of these violations and filed a grievance, which has been properly handled under UConn's collective bargaining agreement.
7) Kevin's union rep. claimed that UConn could not hire another coach, which would have devastated the program.
8) Kevin's legal counsel requested documents via the FOIA effectively putting them in the public domain but now complains that the information he requested is publicly known even though he notified the press of his letter requesting the information. (Note that if he had filed suit and requested the information under the discovery process, they would not have been in the public domain. Choosing to get this information via FOIA was a costly mistake.)
... but "KUMBAYA", "ISH", "RAT" so UConn is at fault, not Kevin?
Do I have that right?