- Joined
- Dec 27, 2016
- Messages
- 230
- Reaction Score
- 530
Yeah, the fan base's mentality is the problem.
Lmfao it’s the fan bases mentality that is the problem? Wow.
Yeah, the fan base's mentality is the problem.
For the record UConn only led once in the 2nd half, by 1 point for a grand total of 13 seconds.We had the lead in the 2nd half, and we were at home with an engaged crowd, hungry for a victory.
We should not have lost this game. Full Stop!
"I'm not a genius"I knew I’d leave half the board behind with that, but I really can’t think of a better match.
For some reason with this team those seconds felt like minutes. We've got to get better.For the record UConn only led once in the 2nd half, by 1 point for a grand total of 13 seconds.
He probably is the kind of person you want talking to you after JC rips in to you on national TVOllie really is a perfect assistant coach. The good cop to the HC's bad cop.
Chief you thinking something pretty benign that someone else says is outrageous has to be my favorite thing.Really?
Did JC do that?He probably is the kind of person you want talking to you after JC rips in to you on national TV
I'm pretty sure she is what they call a spectator, too. Get a degree in management before you post any more opinions.Jeffrey Alex L if you are on this board you are an idiot. The reason I say that is you asked a question of which the answer was obvious. But we can appreciate stupidity here.
I do appreciate Vita's confidence in her brother, hope she knows something.
Yup. Nice way to say he has no shooters. “ we got who we got “. Pretty honest assessment. And for the negative Nancy’s sure to comment. He has to say it was a great game. It’s just proper. Recognize a little showmanship now and then.
Not trying to incite anything, but improvement from what? From getting embarrassed at Auburn? If that’s the case then, sure. Absolute improvement. But folks we’re also saying that Arizona was an improvement from the Syracuse game and then Auburn happened. I think many here (myself included) are looking at a larger span of time - like the years post 2014 when The program (perception-wise) became Ollie’s and the Ollie brand was at its peak.people hate the truth, they hate the nuances of reality, and they really can't comprehend what's going on
if they don't see improvement, they're blinded by hate, it's as simple as that
I can say the fans on Saturday in Hartford were great, they supported their team. Didn't hear one brainless idiot shouting obscenities at Ollie or at the team like I did at MSG
I think the program's very worst fans inhabit this board, and laughingly under the guise of "they only want what's best for the program" and saying those who don't agree with them are "just accepting losing". They're like that ignorant family member spewing nonsense at every family gathering, you just sit there and smile.
Ollie’s ability see and articulate why they lost isn’t the “problem” here. It’s his inability to fix it. Again and again and again. To use your question above, do you really not understand that?After perusing this thread, I had to watch the video of his post game interview.
HE SAID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG, and he's 100% correct about his assessment of the status and the progress of this team
Our entirely new front court needs to develop more, we cut down on turnovers, and they actually did run some decent offense but the kids didn't make shots. All of that will continue to improve.
Do people really not understand any or all of that? seriously?
Not trying to incite anything, but improvement from what? From getting embarrassed at Auburn? If that’s the case then, sure. Absolute improvement. But folks we’re also saying that Arizona was an improvement from the Syracuse game and then Auburn happened. I think many here (myself included) are looking at a larger span of time - like the years post 2014 when The program (perception-wise) became Ollie’s and the Ollie brand was at its peak.
The accusation that hate fuels the negative comments is pretty far fetched. These are not conspiracy theorists...we’re staring down the barrel of historically low moments in UConn basketball history. A stronger argument could be made that the apologists are mired in delusion.
Ollie’s ability see and articulate why they lost isn’t the “problem” here. It’s his inability to fix it. Again and again and again. To use your question above, do you really not understand that?