I have the same thing.NDSU and Santa Clara to the Sweet 16.
Akron/Hofstra facing off in the Round of 32 with Akron advancing.
ACC | Big East | Big 10 | Big 12 | SEC | |
| ACC | 5-4 | 3-10 | 15-11 | 16-13 | |
| Big East | 4-5 | 10-7 | 7-7 | 7-3 |
As seen in that thread, don't pick Kentucky, A&M, or Missouri. (Though Missouri does get to play at home, which is nice).In this thread:
There has been a lot of criticism of the Big East, including quite a few on this board comparing the league to a mid-major, so I put together this analysis
Below are the interconference records between the leagues (Updated for all games).
...
ACC Big East Big 10 Big 12 SECACC 5-4 3-10 15-11 16-13Big East 4-5 10-7 7-7 7-3
- nelsonmuntz
- Replies: 92
- Forum: UConn Men's Basketball Forum
@auror explained that KenPom is the word of God. Since KenPom has this year’s SEC as the 5th best conference of the last 30 years, I have every SEC team winning until they play another SEC team.
If this strategy works, then I will give credit to @auror . If it doesn’t work, then I will have been proven right that the SEC teams gamed the efficiency ratings.
Has anyone set up a Boneyard group bracket on ESPN?
As seen in that thread, don't pick Kentucky, A&M, or Missouri. (Though Missouri does get to play at home, which is nice).
Re-read my posts in that thread. I mentioned those 3 teams as having performed a lot better against weaker teams than stronger teams. There were other teams in the SEC that did the opposite. There was nothing systemic or intentional about it.How can that be unless KenPom’s model was systematically gamed by SEC teams to inflate their efficiency ratings? Hold on, are you saying that I was right?