- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 583
- Reaction Score
- 3,572
Win today just moved us up 6 spots from 34.
Nice research, thanks! However, I didn't realize that kenpom has been around for that long. Are you referring to NET or Kenpom?Gotta go back to 2013 Iowa for a team that was 30th or higher (with a winning record) that missed the tournament.
KenPom has data all the way back to 2002Nice research, thanks! However, I didn't realize that kenpom has been around for that long. Are you referring to NET or Kenpom?
KenPom goes all the way back to 2002. It was often not particularly favorable to us even on our best teams we were never #1 because our offensive efficiency wasn't as high as our defense.Nice research, thanks! However, I didn't realize that kenpom has been around for that long. Are you referring to NET or Kenpom?
Kenpom. Been around for a while and they went back and retroactively applied their formulas to seasons all the way back to 2002Nice research, thanks! However, I didn't realize that kenpom has been around for that long. Are you referring to NET or Kenpom?
Yup they’re still low 50sSeton Hall is a Q1 opportunity, right? Top 75 away opponent? Last I checked their NET was mid-50s.
Agreed.And 32 in Sagarins.
Conclusion: we’re simply not a bubble team at the moment. Doesn’t mean I don’t want to keep winning. Doesn’t mean that 0-3 from here knocks us out. But when you look at all those rankings, as well as the eye test, we are not a bubble team.
Besides making a run in the Big East tournament for its own sake, the goal for the tournament at this point is to try to move our ranking up to say a 6 seed, where we very well might be betting favorites to get to the second weekend.
No. But then, I prefer Barbieporn.Anyone else read it as Kenporn? I see it that way every time. lol!

Sunday update:
36 NET
28 Kenpom
30 BPI
Which does the Committee use?Sunday update:
36 NET
28 Kenpom
30 BPI
They don’t use kenpomWhich does the Committee use?
If they lean on KenPom, we're nearly a lock with only one more win.
NET isn't as secure, and going 1-2 probably drops us into the 40s.
Anyone else read it as Kenporn? I see it that way every time. lol!
Did that change? Because it's definitely been on the team sheets they get in years pastThey don’t use kenpom
A 6 seed is actually a good spot. In round 1, you play an 11 which would be a winnable game. Then in round 2, you would most likely face the 3 seed. Not easy by any means, but you would still avoid the top 2 seeds until the Sweet 16 if they make it that far, and the only chance you get to face the 1 wouldnt be until the Elite 8.This team needs to desperately keep winning. Get me to a 3-5 seed if we win the BET. I want to stay away from that dreaded 8/9 seed, and wouldn’t be opposed to a 7/10. Being a 6 seed scares me.
Lots of 11 over 6 upsets!A 6 seed is actually a good spot. In round 1, you play an 11 which would be a winnable game. Then in round 2, you would most likely face the 3 seed. Not easy by any means, but you would still avoid the top 2 seeds until the Sweet 16 if they make it that far, and the only chance you get to face the 1 wouldnt be until the Elite 8.
Yes, that is a popular upset, just like the 12 over 5. Im just looking at it like...with Bouknight, we are a top 25 team, and probably no worse than a 5 seed. Since he missed time, our entire body of work doesn’t reflect that, and It would most likely affect our seeding. So, even if we are on the 5-6 line, I like our chances of advancing in the early rounds because we are better than that.Lots of 11 over 6 upsets!
You’re basically correct. They have the Kenpom number available, but anytime anyone is talking about Quad 1/2/3/4 wins/losses, the Quad each game falls into is determined by the NET ranking, so it has a much larger influence than the other metrics.Sorry everyone I could’ve sworn they didn’t. My bad!
Massey 39 before yesterday gets plugged inSunday update:
36 NET
28 Kenpom
30 BPI
Outside of the 1-3 lines, lots of upsets across the board. Even a decent amount of 14-3s.Lots of 11 over 6 upsets!