Does anybody understand the Colgate Net rating of 9 and have an opinion as to why the Net metric should have the influence in does if an aberration like this is possible? I saw the mention, but never actually looked before today. Colgate's 12 games have been against just 3 teams. They are 4-0 vs Holy Cross, 4-0 vs BU, and 3-1 vs Army? Other teams in the Patriot League played games, Navy etc. Based on the CBS website schedule it doesn't even look like other league teams were scheduled and postponed or cancelled. What is the backstory I missed. Really strange. They are listed in second place in the Patriot league at 11-1 and I just assumed they had played vs other Patriot League teams. With this net rating, would this have been a window dressing quad 1 game for us to have played them when Bouk was hurt? ie Similar to the net manipulation of Big 10 teams.
The NET has been tuned to reflect the appropriate results under a normal season. It's not built to handle the exceptions that this season brings.
Teams with 0 non-conference games, teams with small numbers of games played, teams going 6-0 on the road with all victories by at least 7 points, teams with 3 40+ point wins among their 12 games played, teams with an average scoring margin of 18 points and who of their 11 wins won by 9+ points in 10 of them (and the one loss was by 2 points).
That's Colgate ^.
Aberrations will always be more prominent with less numbers of games. They get smoothed out by more games and more non-conference games, neither of which happened here. But results from other conferences that are less isolated and more prolific will be more normal(ish).
The B1G didn't manipulate the NET. They just had good teams, played well in non-conf overall, and because of the heavier schedule of conf vs. nonconf gave their medium teams more opportunities to win agaisnt good teams than other conferences. Systems factor this in, but people who only look at quadrant wins and don't factor in win% in those quadrants or scoring margin will be misled.