
Why does UNC's academic situation matter, they'd fit right in with the SEC's "if you ain't cheatin, you gonna take a beatin" philosophy.Only way the SEC can one up the B1G is for the SEC to get UNC or Texas. Both schools want to king of the hill and neither will be in the SEC. Plus, Texas has the Longhorn Network to deal with and an A&M team that is on top and may not want to share. UNC has an academic issue to deal with in which the academic side of Chapel Hill may not take kindly to joining a perceived academically inferior conference.
Why does UNC's academic situation matter, they'd fit right in with the SEC's "if you ain't cheatin, you gonna take a beatin" philosophy.
Serious question: why do you think that Aresco and the AAC are involved?Go Aresco go! At least until our West Virginia friend comes up with some lame excuse that supposedly caused the deal to collapse at the last second.
But I thought MHVER was referring to the SEC.AAC, CUSA, and BE (for basketball)?
My suspicion was similar to you'res about a possible blending of the ACC into the SEC or maybe a Texas connection ?He did mention Slive one upping Delaney earlier.
Sooooo..SEC-ACC and someone? ESPN pretty much owns both of those conferences.
So Disney-ABC announces the new ESPN East conference?
Actually, there has been some chatter that the Big 12 and ACC might merge their wrestling leagues...the ACC has six participants and the Big 12 has four.
My suspicion was similar to you'res about a possible blending of the ACC into the SEC or maybe a Texas connection ?
My suspicion, if anything really exists, is maybe an ACC/SEC scheduling agreement or an ACC/SEC/B12 scheduling agreement. This would be good for many schools of the ACC and SEC due the to 8 game schedule. Including the B12 as well adds more rivalry games, including Pitt/WVU, TX/TAMU, OK/Bama, Mizzou/Kansas. Many ACC/SEC games already take place, so this would help scheduling for the schools that do not play in state rivalry games.