Non-Key Tweets | Page 1062 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

No cap may result in new programs who afford paying huge NIL being at the top but it won't result in parity.
Not sure how you can look at the results of college sports the last two years and say that in sincerity

Missouri, Nebraska, Texas Tech, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Colorado have all landed 5* players in the last 2 years out of high school. The talent in CFB is more spread out than it ever has been

Go look at recruiting classes from 2018, 2019, etc and how much of the talent is held within 5 schools. Then go look at at 2023/2024/2025 recruiting classes. It’s not even remotely close to the same thing
 
Missouri, Nebraska, Texas Tech, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Colorado have all landed 5* players in the last 2 years out of high school. The talent in CFB is more spread out than it ever has been
I understand your argument. I suppose an alternative argument is that the same examples you cited above are an indication that football schools are now successfully buying their way to dominance and other sports as well.
 
You don’t have to expand the tourney to get more money
!. Reduce the Autobids from 32 to 20 conferences
2. Simply increase the per unit amount .
i prefer 2 if you really want to make more money
The power conferences currently earn the lions share of the distribution and increasing the teams only marginally affects the payout
Be careful what you wish for. Autobids might be 20 divided among 4 conferences.
 
Highly doubt this happens unless the AAC collapses entirely

At least not until the current AAC media rights contract expires in 2031. With all the teams that left and all the CUSA teams that replaced those teams, the next AAC contract will be more in line with the Sun Belt.
 
Possibly but I can’t see it being a Big East/PAC12 move
I can see Memphis looking for a big east affiliation for their basketball and Olympic sports. I can see Ackerman thinking that bringing in another quality basketball program and expanding the conferences geographic coverage makes sense for the Big East.

I don't like the addition of Memphis, but I can see it happening.
 
I can see Memphis looking for a big east affiliation for their basketball and Olympic sports. I can see Ackerman thinking that bringing in another quality basketball program and expanding the conferences geographic coverage makes sense for the Big East.

I don't like the addition of Memphis, but I can see it happening.
Maybe. But as we know with Yormark it doesn’t really matter if the commish wants a school. It’s the presidents.
 
Maybe. But as we know with Yormark it doesn’t really matter if the commish wants a school. It’s the presidents.
In the big 12. Is the same true in the big east?
TBD
 
Unless the AAC’s losing members, ECU exit fee and loss of higher current conference revs reportedly would be rather expensive. On the other hand, ECU might be enticed by a more consolidated regional SBC, more similar public schools, and potentially lower travel costs. Tangent: Aside from football, Temple would lose its closest conference opponent.
 
Not sure how you can look at the results of college sports the last two years and say that in sincerity

Missouri, Nebraska, Texas Tech, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Colorado have all landed 5* players in the last 2 years out of high school. The talent in CFB is more spread out than it ever has been

Go look at recruiting classes from 2018, 2019, etc and how much of the talent is held within 5 schools. Then go look at at 2023/2024/2025 recruiting classes. It’s not even remotely close to the same thing
Your data is evidence of that no caps on cash spent led to a shake up of the teams at the top. Not of parity. You'd have to show that the Teams you named as entering the top tier aren't pushing others with less money out of it.
 
Maybe. But as we know with Yormark it doesn’t really matter if the commish wants a school. It’s the presidents.
I think John Silver pointed out that it is actually the AD's. The Presidents do whatever the AD's want consistent with increasing fundraising. My brother the academic pointed out to me that Presidents are measured on their fund raising, full stop. The Provost handles the academic side of things.
 
Usually schools initiate contact with conferences, not the other way around.
I know. The thing is the news that hit yesterday was the Sun Belt approached ECU and ECU said "thanks but no thanks".
 
Not sure how you can look at the results of college sports the last two years and say that in sincerity

Missouri, Nebraska, Texas Tech, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Colorado have all landed 5* players in the last 2 years out of high school. The talent in CFB is more spread out than it ever has been

Go look at recruiting classes from 2018, 2019, etc and how much of the talent is held within 5 schools. Then go look at at 2023/2024/2025 recruiting classes. It’s not even remotely close to the same thing

Another data point - this timeline also coincided with the biggest drop in emphasis on high school recruiting in decades. I would bet on more of a return to normalcy post-House.
 
I think John Silver pointed out that it is actually the AD's. The Presidents do whatever the AD's want consistent with increasing fundraising. My brother the academic pointed out to me that Presidents are measured on their fund raising, full stop. The Provost handles the academic side of things.
It's the presidents. The AD's and conference commissioner are the hired help.
 

Online statistics

Members online
101
Guests online
2,314
Total visitors
2,415

Forum statistics

Threads
164,170
Messages
4,385,558
Members
10,190
Latest member
epkerrigan


.
..
Top Bottom