nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 45,627
- Reaction Score
- 37,340
Yes. but they could also want to make a final decision and announce new additions at once. It would seem disorganized and unprofessional to add schools one at a time over the course of a 6 month period. It looks far stronger to announce your new schools together and then claim you got exactly the ones you wanted all along.
So the Big 12 let UConn cross over the beginning of a new fiscal year because they thought it would look stronger to add everyone at once? Sure.
If UConn was at the top of the list, UConn would have been added already. We clearly are not. If the Big 12 thought they couldn't get any schools that are better, they would also have added UConn. They clearly think Pac 12 schools will start heading for the exits if they don't get the media deal they want, so it is worth it for the Big 12 to wait.
Yet 90% of this board has been rooting for the Pac 12 to fail, despite the fact that outcome would make a whole bunch of schools available that are more attractive to the Big 12 than UConn. People need to think this stuff through.
The only sliver of good news is that the Pac 12 is still holding together, so there must be some reason for them to think that they might get a media deal that works. Anyone that wants UConn to go to the Big 12 better hope that some kind of decent media deal comes through for the Pac 12.