Non-Key Tweets | Page 974 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

And, maybe the fix was always in for Boston College...

For us conspiracy theorists...is it a coincidence that Swofford's son, Chad, went to BC as an Assistant AD in 2004 ?

Was it a coincidence that Swofford insisted to ESPN that Raycom be part of the ACC deal...while Chad was a Raycom exec ?
 
RSTuthill said:
Oh, you think the non FB schools in the BE would entertain that? If so, I can get you a very attractive bridge at half price.
Expand ...
The landscape is changing. Basketball-only leagues will find it very difficult to remain competitive with the P-whatevers moving forward. The BE movers and shakers had better realize they have to at least entertain holding their nose and living with a football wing at this time. I bet they are doing due diligence about the possibility now.
 
History Geek said:
The landscape is changing. Basketball-only leagues will find it very difficult to remain competitive with the P-whatevers moving forward. The BE movers and shakers had better realize they have to at least entertain holding their nose and living with a football wing at this time. I bet they are doing due diligence about the possibility now.
Expand ...
Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.
 
RSTuthill said:
True, but it won't work that way since FB drives the bus.
Expand ...
It's a big double decker bus with basketball on top

UConn Bus.JPG
 
RSTuthill said:
Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.
Expand ...
The BE would no longer be able to compete for natties any more. A not-football BE will get outspent by conferences (P-whatevers) with surplus football money that they could invest in not-football.
 
History Geek said:
The BE would no longer be able to compete for natties any more. A not-football BE will get outspent by conferences (P-whatevers) with surplus football money that they could invest in not-football.
Expand ...
People been saying this since 2013. The league won 3 titles since then. If and when schools are given the ability to directly pay players with media money, then it might become an issue, but right now it's not.

Not to mention that NIL all it takes is one person with a lot of money to compete at a high level, like we've seen with St Johns.
 
How Sway?! said:
People been saying this since 2013. The league won 3 titles since then. If and when schools are given the ability to directly pay players with media money, then it might become an issue, but right now it's not.

Not to mention that NIL all it takes is one person with a lot of money to compete at a high level, like we've seen with St Johns.
Expand ...
Things are different now than 2013.
 
History Geek said:
Things are different now than 2013.
Expand ...
Don't disagree, but when a conference has survived multiple "fatal" wounds throughout it's history and has continued to thrive, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do it again.
 
How Sway?! said:
Don't disagree, but when a conference has survived multiple "fatal" wounds throughout it's history and has continued to thrive, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do it again.
Expand ...
Because the paradigm is about to be turned on its head like it never has before.
 
How Sway?! said:
The other Fox game also got outdrawn by ESPN games. It involved the B1G. Making such declarations without contextualizing weakens the argument.
Expand ...
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
 
History Geek said:
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
Expand ...
Not happening. The TV money is from football and you would need at least 12 football schools for a BE football league to make any sense. And, it would mean a 21 school BE basketball conference which isn't going to work. Plus, you would bring back the football/basketball tension again which nobody wants.
 
History Geek said:
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
Expand ...
A big East with Duke, Syracuse, BC, Pitt and maybe NCST would be fun. They all are fairly local and there would be existing rivalries there. You would need 2 more local teams to get to 8 football schools. I’m not sure you would want the Cali teams or SMU, but the alternatives would be UMass, Temple and Buffalo
 
dayooper said:
A big East with Duke, Syracuse, BC, Pitt and maybe NCST would be fun. They all are fairly local and there would be existing rivalries there. You would need 2 more local teams to get to 8 football schools. I’m not sure you would want the Cali teams or SMU, but the alternatives would be UMass, Temple and Buffalo
Expand ...
USF a Memphis maybe.
 
The Big East needs football. Bring it back asap. When the chance to reassemble the Big East as a football conference comes, pounce on it. There’s a lot of talent in the Big East footprint. Give kids that can choose UConn, Cuse, BC and VTech a reason to do so. Give them an east coast league. Rebuild the Big East. Use the population density to catch back up and contend.
 
Hoophound said:
The Big East needs football. Bring it back asap. When the chance to reassemble the Big East as a football conference comes, pounce on it. There’s a lot of talent in the Big East footprint. Give kids that can choose UConn, Cuse, BC and VTech a reason to do so. Give them an east coast league. Rebuild the Big East. Use the population density to catch back up and contend.
Expand ...
That will be the new ACC, not a new NBE.
 
storrsroars said:
That will be the new ACC, not a new NBE.
Expand ...
I agree that a NACC is more likely than a NNBE ( or a NOBE, lol). UConn, Duke, BC, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech, Stanford/Cal/SMU, maybe WSU/OSU, Notre Dame as an affiliate for 3-5 years until they go B1G, maybe USF, maybe ECU, maybe James Madison. Not a bad scenario given all the potential Armageddon scenarios. For BB, you can get OOC games scheduled with BE rivals like St John's, Providence, Seton Hall, Georgetown to make it more interesting from a traditional rival standpoint.
 
That would work for me.
CTFAN4LIFE said:
I agree that a NACC is more likely than a NNBE ( or a NOBE, lol). UConn, Duke, BC, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech, Stanford/Cal/SMU, maybe WSU/OSU, Notre Dame as an affiliate for 3-5 years until they go B1G, maybe USF, maybe ECU, maybe James Madison. Not a bad scenario given all the potential Armageddon scenarios. For BB, you can get OOC games scheduled with BE rivals like St John's, Providence, Seton Hall, Georgetown to make it more interesting from a traditional rival standpoint.
Expand ...
 
CTFAN4LIFE said:
I agree that a NACC is more likely than a NNBE ( or a NOBE, lol). UConn, Duke, BC, Syracuse, Wake Forest, Georgia Tech, Stanford/Cal/SMU, maybe WSU/OSU, Notre Dame as an affiliate for 3-5 years until they go B1G, maybe USF, maybe ECU, maybe James Madison. Not a bad scenario given all the potential Armageddon scenarios. For BB, you can get OOC games scheduled with BE rivals like St John's, Providence, Seton Hall, Georgetown to make it more interesting from a traditional rival standpoint.
Expand ...
I'd assume that there'd be other decent opponents in that revised ACC depending on how realignment shakes out, schools like Pitt, Louisville, or even Va Tech or NC State.
 

Online statistics

Members online
217
Guests online
2,925
Total visitors
3,142
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Share This Page

Forum statistics

Threads
164,244
Messages
4,388,544
Members
10,195
Latest member
ArtTheFan


.
..
Top Bottom