Non-Key Tweets | Page 974 | The Boneyard

Non-Key Tweets

Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,338
Reaction Score
8,781
Playing Syracuse, BCU, Duke, Pittsburgh, etc. on a consistent basis wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Exactly my point, Throw in the west coast teams and whomever. SMU was it? I have lost track quite frankly.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
1,466
Reaction Score
5,965
Va Tech was lucky to get to the ACC thanks to the lobbying of the Virginia State Legislature. Otherwise they would have been in the AAC with UConn.

They'd've gotten the Louisville spot or gone with Pitt, if the BC block of UConn still worked. (UConn was in a stronger place in Round 2 only 9 months removed from the Fiesta Bowl, so it may not have, given the valuation for Syracuse - UConn was preferred, Syracuse - Pitt good enough)

Round 1 (2004): Miami, BC, Syracuse (Virginia Tech IRL)
Round 2 (2011): Pitt, UConn
Round 3 (Maryland backfill): Virginia Tech (football school selection)
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,896
Reaction Score
8,431
Va Tech was lucky to get to the ACC thanks to the lobbying of the Virginia State Legislature. Otherwise they would have been in the AAC with UConn.
And, very probably, would now be in the Big 12.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2013
Messages
8,896
Reaction Score
8,431
And, maybe the fix was always in for Boston College...

For us conspiracy theorists...is it a coincidence that Swofford's son, Chad, went to BC as an Assistant AD in 2004 ?

Was it a coincidence that Swofford insisted to ESPN that Raycom be part of the ACC deal...while Chad was a Raycom exec ?
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
2,130
Reaction Score
8,654
Oh, you think the non FB schools in the BE would entertain that? If so, I can get you a very attractive bridge at half price.
The landscape is changing. Basketball-only leagues will find it very difficult to remain competitive with the P-whatevers moving forward. The BE movers and shakers had better realize they have to at least entertain holding their nose and living with a football wing at this time. I bet they are doing due diligence about the possibility now.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2016
Messages
4,338
Reaction Score
8,781
The landscape is changing. Basketball-only leagues will find it very difficult to remain competitive with the P-whatevers moving forward. The BE movers and shakers had better realize they have to at least entertain holding their nose and living with a football wing at this time. I bet they are doing due diligence about the possibility now.
Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2014
Messages
17,647
Reaction Score
23,370
True, but it won't work that way since FB drives the bus.
It's a big double decker bus with basketball on top

UConn Bus.JPG
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
2,130
Reaction Score
8,654
Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.
The BE would no longer be able to compete for natties any more. A not-football BE will get outspent by conferences (P-whatevers) with surplus football money that they could invest in not-football.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,114
Reaction Score
6,154
The BE would no longer be able to compete for natties any more. A not-football BE will get outspent by conferences (P-whatevers) with surplus football money that they could invest in not-football.
People been saying this since 2013. The league won 3 titles since then. If and when schools are given the ability to directly pay players with media money, then it might become an issue, but right now it's not.

Not to mention that NIL all it takes is one person with a lot of money to compete at a high level, like we've seen with St Johns.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
2,130
Reaction Score
8,654
People been saying this since 2013. The league won 3 titles since then. If and when schools are given the ability to directly pay players with media money, then it might become an issue, but right now it's not.

Not to mention that NIL all it takes is one person with a lot of money to compete at a high level, like we've seen with St Johns.
Things are different now than 2013.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2019
Messages
1,114
Reaction Score
6,154
Things are different now than 2013.
Don't disagree, but when a conference has survived multiple "fatal" wounds throughout it's history and has continued to thrive, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do it again.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
2,130
Reaction Score
8,654
Don't disagree, but when a conference has survived multiple "fatal" wounds throughout it's history and has continued to thrive, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do it again.
Because the paradigm is about to be turned on its head like it never has before.
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2013
Messages
2,130
Reaction Score
8,654
The other Fox game also got outdrawn by ESPN games. It involved the B1G. Making such declarations without contextualizing weakens the argument.
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
 
Joined
Sep 18, 2011
Messages
5,340
Reaction Score
21,770
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
Not happening. The TV money is from football and you would need at least 12 football schools for a BE football league to make any sense. And, it would mean a 21 school BE basketball conference which isn't going to work. Plus, you would bring back the football/basketball tension again which nobody wants.
 

dayooper

It's what I do. I drink and I know things.
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
1,734
Reaction Score
4,565
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
A big East with Duke, Syracuse, BC, Pitt and maybe NCST would be fun. They all are fairly local and there would be existing rivalries there. You would need 2 more local teams to get to 8 football schools. I’m not sure you would want the Cali teams or SMU, but the alternatives would be UMass, Temple and Buffalo
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
718
Reaction Score
2,523
A big East with Duke, Syracuse, BC, Pitt and maybe NCST would be fun. They all are fairly local and there would be existing rivalries there. You would need 2 more local teams to get to 8 football schools. I’m not sure you would want the Cali teams or SMU, but the alternatives would be UMass, Temple and Buffalo
USF a Memphis maybe.
 

Online statistics

Members online
389
Guests online
2,008
Total visitors
2,397

Forum statistics

Threads
159,552
Messages
4,195,478
Members
10,066
Latest member
bardira


.
Top Bottom