Va Tech was lucky to get to the ACC thanks to the lobbying of the Virginia State Legislature. Otherwise they would have been in the AAC with UConn.
I'm rooting for a Big East/ACC blendI’d prefer the Big East add them and get back in the football business.
Exactly my point, Throw in the west coast teams and whomever. SMU was it? I have lost track quite frankly.Playing Syracuse, BCU, Duke, Pittsburgh, etc. on a consistent basis wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Oh, you think the non FB schools in the BE would entertain that? If so, I can get you a very attractive bridge at half price.I’d prefer the Big East add them and get back in the football business.
Va Tech was lucky to get to the ACC thanks to the lobbying of the Virginia State Legislature. Otherwise they would have been in the AAC with UConn.
And, very probably, would now be in the Big 12.Va Tech was lucky to get to the ACC thanks to the lobbying of the Virginia State Legislature. Otherwise they would have been in the AAC with UConn.
The landscape is changing. Basketball-only leagues will find it very difficult to remain competitive with the P-whatevers moving forward. The BE movers and shakers had better realize they have to at least entertain holding their nose and living with a football wing at this time. I bet they are doing due diligence about the possibility now.Oh, you think the non FB schools in the BE would entertain that? If so, I can get you a very attractive bridge at half price.
The Big Atlantic Coast Conference...in the East.I'm rooting for a Big East/ACC blend
Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.The landscape is changing. Basketball-only leagues will find it very difficult to remain competitive with the P-whatevers moving forward. The BE movers and shakers had better realize they have to at least entertain holding their nose and living with a football wing at this time. I bet they are doing due diligence about the possibility now.
They'd get some historically good basketball programs back in the fold in the bargain.Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.
True, but it won't work that way since FB drives the bus.They'd get some historically good basketball programs back in the fold in the bargain.
It's a big double decker bus with basketball on topTrue, but it won't work that way since FB drives the bus.
The BE would no longer be able to compete for natties any more. A not-football BE will get outspent by conferences (P-whatevers) with surplus football money that they could invest in not-football.Agreed. But the BB only schools don't get much out of adding FB. The FB revenue goes to the FB schools. I do not see the incentive.
People been saying this since 2013. The league won 3 titles since then. If and when schools are given the ability to directly pay players with media money, then it might become an issue, but right now it's not.The BE would no longer be able to compete for natties any more. A not-football BE will get outspent by conferences (P-whatevers) with surplus football money that they could invest in not-football.
Things are different now than 2013.People been saying this since 2013. The league won 3 titles since then. If and when schools are given the ability to directly pay players with media money, then it might become an issue, but right now it's not.
Not to mention that NIL all it takes is one person with a lot of money to compete at a high level, like we've seen with St Johns.
Don't disagree, but when a conference has survived multiple "fatal" wounds throughout it's history and has continued to thrive, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do it again.Things are different now than 2013.
Because the paradigm is about to be turned on its head like it never has before.Don't disagree, but when a conference has survived multiple "fatal" wounds throughout it's history and has continued to thrive, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to do it again.
Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.The other Fox game also got outdrawn by ESPN games. It involved the B1G. Making such declarations without contextualizing weakens the argument.
Not happening. The TV money is from football and you would need at least 12 football schools for a BE football league to make any sense. And, it would mean a 21 school BE basketball conference which isn't going to work. Plus, you would bring back the football/basketball tension again which nobody wants.Fair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
A big East with Duke, Syracuse, BC, Pitt and maybe NCST would be fun. They all are fairly local and there would be existing rivalries there. You would need 2 more local teams to get to 8 football schools. I’m not sure you would want the Cali teams or SMU, but the alternatives would be UMass, Temple and BuffaloFair point. I stand by my assertion that I think the BE won’t survive in the upcoming landscape without accepting a football wing. I can see an ACC remnant/Big East merger that is strong G-whatever in both football and hoops.
USF a Memphis maybe.A big East with Duke, Syracuse, BC, Pitt and maybe NCST would be fun. They all are fairly local and there would be existing rivalries there. You would need 2 more local teams to get to 8 football schools. I’m not sure you would want the Cali teams or SMU, but the alternatives would be UMass, Temple and Buffalo