- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,794
- Reaction Score
- 3,675
He probably did okay with the situation he was given. Difficult to see a much better outcome. As a UConn fan, he did no favors for UConn and we are better off without him.
Apparently he was so outstanding at his job that every single university wanted to flee the conference at its earliest opportunity. Think about that.I am content with my rational grasp of reality. Why would a network pay top dollar for games from a conference when no one knew which teams would be in the conference the following year? All content isn't equal.
Apparently he was so bad at his job the university presidents have refused to replace him. I guess they are in the same boat of contentment I am riding. But, OK.
That was true from the beginning....and that is the point.Apparently he was so outstanding at his job that every single university wanted to flee the conference at its earliest opportunity. Think about that.
It didn't get better, and in fact got worse. That's the point.That was true from the beginning....and that is the point.
I have a different viewpoint. No AAC school has left for another G5, conference. Schools have left other G5s to come to the AAC.It didn't get better, and in fact got worse. That's the point.
Schools leaving for a p5 invite is hardly a case against Aresco.Apparently he was so outstanding at his job that every single university wanted to flee the conference at its earliest opportunity. Think about that.
Your case is weak. Aresco lost schools to P5 so he’s a failure? Aresco failed to lure P5 schools to the AAC, so he’s a failure?It didn't get better, and in fact got worse. That's the point.
I have a different viewpoint. No AAC school has left for another G5, conference. Schools have left other G5s to come to the AAC.
OK are the low value TV contracts and indictment against him? How about the fact that he gave away Connecticut tier 3 rights is that an indictment? How about the fact that he sold off the conferences are you single most valuable property, the Big East name? How about the fact that he sold conference USA's playbook and essentially re-created conference USA? Are any of those indictments?Schools leaving for a p5 invite is hardly a case against Aresco.
Besides UConn which is a unique situation, did any leave and not go to a P5.
That's what I called strawman arguments. I they are generally considered disingenuous since you are creating arguments to shoot down. I never talked about the failure to quote lure P5s did I?Your case is weak. Aresco lost schools to P5 so he’s a failure? Aresco failed to lure P5 schools to the AAC, so he’s a failure?
The Big East name was not a positive for football, just hoops. And not allowing UConn to profit from its women BB rights for non-national games was simply using the asset for the benefit of the whole conference, and not us specifically. We would have all screamed bloody murder if Aresco allowed Rutgers, say, in the beginning, to profit from the sale of its wrestling rights to a local station when we weren’t allowed to do that.OK are the low value TV contracts and indictment against him? How about the fact that he gave away Connecticut tier 3 rights is that an indictment? How about the fact that he sold off the conferences are you single most valuable property, the Big East name? How about the fact that he sold conference USA's playbook and essentially re-created conference USA? Are any of those indictments?
The Big East name was a positive for football when compared to the American brand. The Big East name gives credibility in the eyes of casual fans that don’t pay close attention to conference realignment. At least people have heard of the Big East.The Big East name was not a positive for football, just hoops. And not allowing UConn to profit from its women BB rights for non-national games was simply using the asset for the benefit of the whole conference, and not us specifically. We would have all screamed bloody murder if Aresco allowed Rutgers, say, in the beginning, to profit from the sale of its wrestling rights to a local station when we weren’t allowed to do that.
Disagree. The Big East name gave us a recognized brand. It was just a brand that was inconsistent with Aresco's "conference USA" style plan. Once that name was lost to the C7 the conference redefined itself as a G5 start up conference. It was a "new coke" level move.The Big East name was not a positive for football, just hoops. And not allowing UConn to profit from its women BB rights for non-national games was simply using the asset for the benefit of the whole conference, and not us specifically. We would have all screamed bloody murder if Aresco allowed Rutgers, say, in the beginning, to profit from the sale of its wrestling rights to a local station when we weren’t allowed to do that.
He should have promoted ass is lol.
SW AIM SHOW@GSw aim · 58m
BREAKING: The #Pac12 "will NOT have a media deal" before their annual "media days", according to a P12 school athletic administrator. Not 100% sure I'm the first to report this, so if someone else had it first, my apologies.
Wrong. If any PAC schools leave for the Big 12, UConn will be involved. Yormark has a hard on for UConn. Plus Kansas wants UConn.Then UConn is cooked. It is amazing how many posters are celebrating the Pac12’s demise when it would be the final nail in UConn’s P5 coffin. It is like this board is rooting for UConn to fail.
You could be right and you could be wrong. We get it. We were always a long shot regardless of what happens and regardless of what our true value is. The horse you keep beating passed away three weeks ago.Then UConn is cooked. It is amazing how many posters are celebrating the Pac12’s demise when it would be the final nail in UConn’s P5 coffin. It is like this board is rooting for UConn to fail.
Wrong. If any PAC schools leave for the Big 12, UConn will be involved. Yormark has a hard on for UConn. Plus Kansas wants UConn.