- Joined
- May 10, 2016
- Messages
- 276
- Reaction Score
- 782
The trouble is the Big 12 can justify the selection based on whatever suits the narrative they choose. If it is best football available based upon history, they can say BYU. If it is a travel partner for WV with "solid" football, they can justify an invite to Cinn. If it is net value, academics (they pay lip service to this one) and best for a network, Uconn is easy to justify. I guess Houston can be justified by FB potential?One of the reasons for expansion was supposedly because WV was on an island. There are no other teams in the league anywhere close. So why would the B12 remedy that by inviting another island in BYU? That doesn't make sense. Then again, who ever claimed the B12 ever made logical decisions? (Note - I am not advocating that they take BYU and CSU, before anybody accuses me of that!?)
Unfortunately, the decision will probably be the product of political back room horsetrading as opposed to really looking what is best for the league as a whole. Have there ever been any decisions in the past that would give one confidence that a rational decision will be made in this case?