- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 5,188
- Reaction Score
- 10,686
He did not say we were being invited to pitch. He said the meeting was to gauge our interest in joining. As in:
Big XII: UConn, on the terms set forth, would you ..
UConn: signed.
![rV7sHBi.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FrV7sHBi.gif&hash=1b97fd1df8d0d2922069185c17c04762)
He did not say we were being invited to pitch. He said the meeting was to gauge our interest in joining. As in:
Big XII: UConn, on the terms set forth, would you ..
UConn: signed.
I'd like to believe what you're saying is what's happening because that puts the process one step forward than where I had it based on that post. What gives me pause that the process is as far along as you're suggesting it might be is that apparently the meeting we are getting has been set up with "several other schools." "Several" seems too high a number to be just the schools being invited.
the big east outside Villanova and Georgetown is garbage. why are people so enamored with playing in a glorified CYO basketball league.For some those reports that UConn had been having "undisclosed discussions" with the Big East (which I believe were right around the Skibletts announcement are giving me a funny feeling. Despite what this dude says FB to the Big12 and all other sports in the Big East would be nearly ideal. I'd still prefer ACC membership would be No. 1.
We are seriously dropping the ball here. Why don't we ( The BY) have someone staged outside Susie's office reporting back every move?
Xavier, Providence, Marquette, Butler, Seton Hall, Creighton are all decent-to-very good. The only garbage programs are St. John's & DePaul.the big east outside Villanova and Georgetown is garbage.
Several could mean 4.
It's good news, but I don't think it's a "you're invited" meeting, rather a "what terms would you agree to?" meeting. Subsequently, they could use that to negotiate which teams would take the least amount of money to enter, match that against their desires for inclusion (so that ECU doesn't say WE'LL TAKE NO $ FOR 10 YEARS!!!!!! and get in) and make their decision.This idea that they're gonna have all the serious candidates pitch doesn't make much sense.
You already paid good money to get objective data from an impartial source. You already know all the numbers. You (presumably) know what your network partners want. You know who could possibly get to 8 votes.
If we're going to talk to the Big 12 about our "interest in joining", I think it's a "you're invited, here's the terms" meeting. The football season is fast approaching and I have to believe this will be done by then. This is good news.
This idea that they're gonna have all the serious candidates pitch doesn't make much sense.
You already paid good money to get objective data from an impartial source. You already know all the numbers. You (presumably) know what your network partners want. You know who could possibly get to 8 votes.
If we're going to talk to the Big 12 about our "interest in joining", I think it's a "you're invited, here's the terms" meeting. The football season is fast approaching and I have to believe this will be done by then. This is good news.
This should be very simple...This idea that they're gonna have all the serious candidates pitch doesn't make much sense.
You already paid good money to get objective data from an impartial source. You already know all the numbers. You (presumably) know what your network partners want. You know who could possibly get to 8 votes.
If we're going to talk to the Big 12 about our "interest in joining", I think it's a "you're invited, here's the terms" meeting. The football season is fast approaching and I have to believe this will be done by then. This is good news.
If we ever got back together with those leech schools even in this manor I would seriously have to think about my contributions to the UConn athletic development fund. I want absolutely NOTHING to do with ANY of those schools outside of having to deal with PC as a HE member!Xavier, Providence, Marquette, Butler, Seton Hall, Creighton are all decent-to-very good. The only garbage programs are St. John's & DePaul.
Obviously being in the Big 12 is a better situation, but if somehow, nonsensically, we end up with Big 12 football and the choice of Big East or AAC for everything else, there is no choice.
The more I've thought about it, the less I think this is going to be a reverse auction deal. You can't totally fleece the new members of your conference.But as people have been mentioning, there is certainly incentive on the Big12's behalf to perhaps negotiate with schools and take bids on who will take the least, so that the remaining schools can carve up more of the pro-rata money. So if you're inviting 4, you meet with 6 you could live with, and either take the 4 lowest bids or approach the others and make them match or compromise.
It's good news, but I don't think it's a "you're invited" meeting, rather a "what terms would you agree to?" meeting. Subsequently, they could use that to negotiate which teams would take the least amount of money to enter, match that against their desires for inclusion (so that ECU doesn't say WE'LL TAKE NO $ FOR 10 YEARS!!!!!! and get in) and make their decision.
You have to figure and hope the tv people steer the B12 back to decisions that make the most sense for now and for 2025. So no ECU or school X for nada for 8 years.It's good news, but I don't think it's a "you're invited" meeting, rather a "what terms would you agree to?" meeting. Subsequently, they could use that to negotiate which teams would take the least amount of money to enter, match that against their desires for inclusion (so that ECU doesn't say WE'LL TAKE NO $ FOR 10 YEARS!!!!!! and get in) and make their decision.
We are seriously dropping the ball here. Why don't we ( The BY) have someone staged outside Susie's office reporting back every move?
The can be various versions of done deal. Have the decided in principal who to invite, has everyone accepted (ha!), is the media on board, is everything signed.
My guess is that the offers are prepared and the networks have signed off. I don't think anyone has been "invited" just yet, or if they have it's been a heads up with a followup on the formalities before an exchange of terms/contracts.
The lawyers will need a couple weeks to work it out, get any trustee/state approvals worked out and arrange the announcement details.
Flug's time line is still realistic for next Friday.
It's like a compass needle as you approach the pole. Dancing all over the place, yet you will still get there eventually.
DO NOT DO THIS.
It's good news, but I don't think it's a "you're invited" meeting, rather a "what terms would you agree to?" meeting. Subsequently, they could use that to negotiate which teams would take the least amount of money to enter, match that against their desires for inclusion (so that ECU doesn't say WE'LL TAKE NO $ FOR 10 YEARS!!!!!! and get in) and make their decision.
They don't need that kind of auction process. Each candidate will accept any reasonable terms, and the XII knows it already. Asking schools to harm themselves by taking less than they need to upgrade doesn't serve the XII's purpose anyway, as creating 4 Rutgers will not help the XII in the short, intermediate or long term.
We are seriously dropping the ball here. Why don't we ( The BY) have someone staged outside Susie's office reporting back every move?
No, and I doubt we'd hear a peep from her until a decision was made public in either direction.Does anyone know when the last time Suzy was quoted about anything?
Maybe not an auction, but if stadium expansion is on their wish list, it would certainly be something that would need to be ironed out.