They had money on the Illinois-Indiana game and went to the monitor to get an update.No, you’re right.
Not sure what the solution is - the reviews have got to change, though.
If you did not see a flagrant clear enough to call it, skip the review.
Maybe just review the ones you do call.
They had money on the Illinois-Indiana game and went to the monitor to get an update.
I would argue, based on the inconsistent whistle in the last 5 minutes or so, that our refs had money on Hall and the 10-11 pts. so they succeeded. suspend the 3 of them and check their venmos/PayPal’s/and equivalents!
It doesn't help when Holloway is allowed to chat up refs for 10 minutes after every ball stoppage.
How do reviews take so long? Like they show the review and I can tell in 5 secondsNo, you’re right.
Not sure what the solution is - the reviews have got to change, though.
If you did not see a flagrant clear enough to call it, skip the review.
Maybe just review the ones you do call.
They shouldn’t have a time limit on reviews if they don’t alreadyHow do reviews take so long? Like they show the review and I can tell in 5 seconds
If it's 2.5 hours in regulation time, what you're watching is fouls, free throws, reviews and officials huddling. You're not watching a free flowing game with rhythmI agree that the officiating has to get better, but there's nowhere I'd rather be than XL/Gampel for 2.5 or 3 hours. Bad thread title.
I see this brought up a lot but don't really see how this fixes anythingI’d love to see the Men’s game move to 4 quarters with adjusted timeouts. It’s really sped up the Women’s game.
2 less media timeouts per game probably shaves 5 minutes off. Maybe less FTs too since it resets every quarter, though I'm not sure what the data would say on thatI see this brought up a lot but don't really see how this fixes anything
And spend half the game coaching from half courtIt doesn't help when Holloway is allowed to chat up refs for 10 minutes after every ball stoppage.